Financial Review

Pick a Lane

Sinclair Noe — November 17, 2015

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 13:17 — 6.1MB)

Subscribe: iTunes | Android | RSS

DOW + 6 = 17,489
SPX – 2 = 2050
NAS + 1 = 4986
10 YR YLD – .01 = 2.26%
OIL – .95 = 40.79
GOLD – 12.30 = 1070.80
SILV – .06 = 14.29

Global equity markets moved higher today, following the rally yesterday on Wall Street and brushed off concerns related to Friday’s terror attacks in Paris. In their final communique from a summit in Turkey, the leaders of the world’s largest economies stuck to a goal of lifting their collective output by an extra 2% by 2018, even though growth remains uneven and weaker than expected globally. G20 leaders also endorsed plans to address Syria’s refugee crisis, taxation, climate change, cyber security and inequality.

France launched another set of airstrikes on the ISIS stronghold of Raqqa in Syria early Tuesday as the country steps up its response to last week’s deadly attacks. The bombings follow a second night of home searches in France and Belgium to catch those responsible and linked to the killings. President Francois Hollande is now looking to expand his powers under France’s state-of-emergency statute and has called on the U.S. and Russia to form a “big unified coalition” to destroy ISIS.

Meanwhile, Russian officials said they had found evidence that the passenger jet that crashed in Egypt last month was downed by a bomb, the first time those investigating the crash have cited proof of a terrorist attack. Russia’s military doubled its attacks in Syria on Tuesday. President Putin ordered Russian naval forces in the Mediterranean to work as allies with French warships in attacking ISIS targets in Syria; not necessarily a France-Russia alliance, but certainly greater military coordination.

The consumer price index increased by a seasonally adjusted 0.2% in October. The CPI measures prices at the retail level and is used to determine cost of living adjustments. The cost of housing and medical care, two of the biggest expenses for most families, climbed again and are running above a 3% annual rate. Rents rose 0.3% in October and medical care jumped 0.7%, the biggest increase in five months. Food prices, meanwhile, rose just 0.1%, marking the smallest gain in five months. Energy prices advanced 0.3%, even though the price of gasoline was down last month. The discrepancy comes from seasonal adjustments. Overall inflation is up 0.2% in the past year. Core prices, excluding food and energy, are up 1.9% in the past 12 months.

Separately, a new report from Aon Hewitt shows health insurance costs for employees of midsize and large companies averaged $4,700 in 2015; that’s up 130% from $2,001 in 2005. The report shows 38% of employers have increased their participants’ deductibles and/or copays in the last year, and another 46% may do so in the future. Employers are making cutbacks in health coverage in other ways, too. Some 18% of companies are reducing subsidies for covered dependents, and 17% are adding a surcharge for adult dependents who have access to other health coverage. Plus, 43% of companies are considering using unitized pricing, in which employees pay per person instead of individual versus family.

So there are some signs of inflation in some areas but no indication that inflation is overheating, at least according to the headline inflation numbers. Still, for most of us, it seems like there is inflation; housing and rents have increased, health care, education, and food prices seem to be on the rise. Even wages are starting to show gains. The economy has added jobs at a rapid pace over the past few years, putting some upward pressure on wages and reducing the unemployment rate to 5%. The government said real, or inflation-adjusted, hourly wages advanced 0.2% in October. Real wages have climbed 2.4% in the past 12 months.

You’re not just imagining it. Prices are going up, except for commodities. And the price of energy has an oversized influence on the annual inflation rate. The Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation is the Personal Consumption Expenditures index, or PCE, which is running at a 1.3% annualized pace; still below the Fed’s target of 2% inflation but likely to rise quickly with expected increases to health care premiums over the next few months.

Now add fiscal policy to the mix. After years of gridlock the government has finally approved a 2 year budget, and it actually includes some spending; it will likely add 0.3% to gross domestic product, rather than subtracting 2% from growth; it might even result in a few government jobs, rather than cutting government jobs. And those government workers will go out and spend their paychecks on Main Street, adding to demand and circulating money through the economy. Next year will be the first since 2010 that fiscal policy adds to growth. For years, Fed Chair Bernanke (and more recently Chair Yellen) complained about headwinds from fiscal policy, or the lack thereof. Now we are about to see a shift from monetary policy alone to fiscal policy – a passing of the baton, which is always the most perilous part of a relay; too early or too late, and the race comes to a grinding halt.

The next concern is whether fiscal policy is capable of running with the baton (to extend the analogy), and staying in the correct lane. If government spending goes to projects that improve productivity – things like infrastructure and education – then it will likely improve growth. French President Francois Hollande said he will step up spending on security in the wake of the terrorist attacks in Paris, but this type of spending is not likely to result in economic growth. So, it’s not just a matter of changing from monetary policy to fiscal policy, it is important that something is actually accomplished with the stimulus. This has been the big drawback of monetary policy; the Fed dropped money on Wall Street but it never made it to Main Street.

A new Reuters analysis shows that corporate spending on buybacks and dividends has surged relative to investment in long-term growth through R&D and other forms of capital spending, in a troubling sign that corporate America may be undermining itself. Almost 60% of the 3,297 publicly traded non-financial U.S. companies examined bought back their shares since 2010. In fiscal 2014 alone, the total amount returned to shareholders (including share repurchases and dividends) reached $885 billion, way more than the companies’ combined net income of $847 billion. And the spending on buybacks, or financial engineering squeezes out investments in R&D, which has dropped.

Industrial production fell 0.2% in October but manufacturing output advanced 0.4% in October. Overall production was held down by a drop in mining and utility output. In addition, the Fed revised August production higher to a 0.1% gain from previous estimate of a 0.1% drop. As a result, industrial production was up at a 2.6% annual rate in the third quarter.

The National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo housing market index pulled back 3 points to 62, slightly below expectations but up from 58 a year ago. A reading over 50 signals improvement. Builders have reported strong results in the most recent earnings season. D.R. Horton, the largest US homebuilder, reported a 44% jump in profit in the most recent quarter, with orders up 19%. Lennar, the number-two builder by volume, also reported profit and revenue that were better than expected. Orders rose more than 10%.

Greece has reached a preliminary deal with its international lenders on home foreclosures reform, removing a major obstacle holding up fresh bailout loans for the debt-laden country. The changes will see Athens qualify for a €2-billion-euro sub-tranche of new financial aid to pay off state arrears and €10-billion-euro in funds to help recapitalize the country’s four main banks.

Walmart beats. Walmart earned $1.03 per share from continuing operations in the third quarter, but $0.99 excluding adjustments to its leases. Still, that was marginally higher than the $0.98 expected by analysts. Comparable-store sales, or sales at stores open at least a year, at Walmart’s US stores were up 1.5%. E-commerce sales were up by 10%.

Home Depot beats. The do-it-yourself home-improvement chain earned $1.36 per share in third quarter, beating expectations for $1.32. This was driven by a healthy 5.1% gain in comparable-store sales, which was better than the 4.6% expected by analysts.

Urban Outfitters missed. Urban Outfitters reported record third quarter sales that missed estimates, and earnings per share matched estimates, but comparable-store sales climbed by just 1% during the period, missing expectations for 3.4% growth. The news came after shares dropped 7.4% following the company’s announcement that it acquired a group of restaurants including the fast-casual chain Pizzeria Vetri. Apparently I’m not the only one who fails to see the synergy between retail clothing and pizza.

Shares of Dick’s Sporting Goods are getting clobbered. Dick’s reported third quarter adjusted earnings of $0.45 per share, missing expectations by a penny. Same-store sales, or sales at stores open at least a year, were up 0.4% in the quarter across the company, less than the 1.9% increase that was expected. And then the salt on the wound: the company lowered fourth quarter guidance.

A New York state judge denied a temporary restraining order sought by daily fantasy sports companies DraftKings and FanDuel in an effort to keep operating in the state after NY Attorney General Eric Schneiderman deemed the games to be illegal gambling. The government will now move for an injunction against the companies which will be heard in court on Nov. 25. DraftKings continues to operate as usual in New York despite the pressure from Schneiderman’s office, but FanDuel stopped taking new deposits from state players on Friday.

A US House of Representatives investigative panel plans to hold a 2016 hearing on skyrocketing drug costs. Earlier this month, the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging launched a probe into drug pricing at Valeant and Turing, signaling growing bipartisan agreement over the need to review prescription medicine costs across the nation.

Thursday, June 26, 2014 - Buffers and Filibusters

Financial Review with Sinclair Noe

DOW – 21 = 16,846
SPX – 2 = 1957
NAS – 0.71 = 4379
10 YR YLD - .03 = 2.52%
OIL - .80 = 105.70
GOLD  - .70 = 1317.90
SILV + .10 = 21.22

 

Yesterday, the Commerce Department downgraded the first quarter gross domestic product to a negative 2.9%, meaning the economy shrank by 2.9%. Today, St. Louis Federal Reserve president James Bullard says it’s likely an aberration; the weak report for the first quarter was likely distorted by inventories, weather, and by the challenges of accounting for health-care spending under the new law. Bullard says he isn’t worried, “the market’s right to shake this off. Looking forward over the next four quarter, most forecasters have 3% growth.”

Well, that’s good. No worries. Nothing to see hear, move along, move along.

It’s just that the fall was so nasty, it’s hard not to look and linger over the carnage. It really was ugly. And while we can blame it on the weather, that doesn’t seem right. We always have weather. Minneapolis is underwater today. Bad weather is a fairly constant aberration. We should be past the point of excuses; we are 5 years into a recovery; granted it has been a stealth recovery.

I wonder if Mr. Bullard is confusing the stock market with the economy. A down day in the bull market would just be a blip on the tape, but the stock market is not the economy. And the economy is not bouncing back, which would be the expected move after a seasonal aberration. Most importantly, we haven’t seen a surge in hiring. It looks more like we’ve gone through a very long period where everybody who was going to be fired was fired, and companies are running as lean as they can. So, the jobless claims have leveled off, but there’s a big difference between no more fat to cut and an economy that produces lots of well-paying jobs.

If you want new jobs, and the consumer spending that flows from new jobs, you look for new businesses, and you can just keep looking. The creation rate of new businesses, as well as new plants built by existing firms, was about 30% lower in 2011 (the most recent year of data) compared with the annual average rate for the 1980s. The decline affected nearly all business sectors. The fact that the economy has been weak since 2007 suggests that new business activity has also declined in existing companies.

New businesses are critical for economic growth because a small fraction of today's startups will become tomorrow's economic heavyweights. Most of today's workers are employed at older, established businesses, but the country cannot rely on existing companies to boost the economy.

Businesses have a life cycle, in which even the largest and most successful reach a stage at which they stop expanding. Also, most of today’s workers are working at smaller businesses, companies with less than 100 employees, and we just aren’t making enough of these smaller businesses.

The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy has been a boon for Wall Street, so we’ve seen record highs even as the economy contracts. The Fed policy was to elevate asset prices in the hope it would trickle down to the rest of the economy; the trickle down part has been a terrible failure but the higher prices have been nifty for a small group of financial companies and some of the largest corporations. The problem is that it is hard to maintain corporate profits in a recession. Also, it’s hard to have sustainable growth from big corporations; they’re like trees; once they reach a certain height, they stop growing. Look back to the Fortune 500 list from 1995; less than half the firms on that list are still on the list today.

And businesses aren’t investing for the future. A major factor in the first quarter contraction was lower gross private domestic investment; a smaller increase in inventories accounted for most of that, but we also saw a drop in investment in non-residential structures, investment in equipment, investment in information processing equipment; countered by a slight increase in investment in intellectual property; that’s tricky to measure because it could be money spent on research and development or it might be money spent on movies. Lower investment accounted for about 2% of the 2.9% drop.

For the last few decades, every boom has depended on housing; same strategy today. The problem is that boomers will not start upgrading now in their 60s. And the young ones expected to pick up the baton are full of debt. And the housing numbers seem to back it up. We did see a big jump in new home sales for May, but that was mainly confined to the South, meanwhile existing home sales barely inched forward, and it appears the big run in home sales has happened and now we’re leveling out. Any boost from housing has already hit.

And this is the recurring theme of the recovery, it’s just around the corner.

No, not that corner, the next corner.

The Supreme Court is still dishing out decisions; two more today, but not the big one on Hobby Lobby; that will probably come on Monday. Today we heard about buffer zones and recess appointments.

The Supreme Court ruled on McCullen v. Coakley, striking down a Massachusetts law requiring protesters to stay at least 35 feet from an abortion clinic's entrance and walkways. In a unanimous opinion, the court held that such buffer zones violate First Amendment free speech rights.

Only three other states, Colorado, Montana and New Hampshire, have buffer zone laws on the books, but the Massachusetts zone was the largest. The Massachusetts law was passed after 2 clinic workers were shot and killed by a gunman outside a clinic in 1994. In 2000, the Supreme Court upheld Colorado's 8-foot "floating" buffer zones around individuals as they walk into and exit an abortion clinic.

Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the court. "It is no accident that public streets and sidewalks have developed as venues for the exchange of ideas." Roberts said: “Even today, they remain one of the few places where a speaker can be confident that he is not simply preaching to the choir. With respect to other means of communication, an individual confronted with an uncomfortable message can always turn the page, change the channel, or leave the Web site."

The court was silent on the free speech rights of protesters confined to “free speech pens” around political conventions, and buffer zones around churches, and funeral services, and for that matter, the buffer around the Supreme Court building in Washington DC.

Also today, the Supremes ruled unanimously in NLRB v Noel Canning that President Obama had violated the Constitution in 2012 by appointing officials to the National Labor Relations Board during a short break in the Senate’s work when the chamber was convening every three days in short pro forma sessions when no business was conducted. Those breaks were too short, Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote in a majority opinion joined by the court’s four more liberal members.

A ruling could cast a cloud over the appointment of Richard Cordray as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Justice Breyer added that recess appointments remain permissible so long as they are made during a break of 10 or more days. But many experts say that if either house of Congress is controlled by the party opposed to the president, lawmakers can effectively block such appointments by requiring pro forma sessions every three days. Each house must get the approval of the other chamber for recesses of more than three days. Somebody shows up, claims the Senate is in session, and they hold a fake session and that’s that.

The decision affirmed a broad ruling last year from a federal appeals court in Washington that had called into question the constitutionality of many recess appointments by presidents of both parties. The appeals court last year said that presidents may bypass the Senate only during the recesses between formal sessions of Congress. Two of the three appellate judges went further, saying that presidents may fill only vacancies that arose during that same recess. The Constitution’s recess-appointments clause says, “The president shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate.”

And while today’s ruling is being hailed as a major blow to executive power, in practical terms, today’s ruling no longer really matters. That’s because the Senate majority has since eliminated the filibuster on executive and judicial appointments that was the cause of this whole mess to begin with.

After the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last year that the NLRB appointments were illegal, President Obama renominated appointees to fill those slots and submitted them to the Senate. What happened? Senate Republicans filibustered them forever, of course. Eventually, Senate majority leader Harry Reid got fed up and triggered the “nuclear option”: a Senate rules change that would require only 50 votes, instead of 60, to invoke cloture on executive and judicial nominations. The NLRB nominees, and several others that had been held up, made their way through.

Yesterday, the Supremes ruled that law enforcement can’t search your smartphone without a warrant or a really, really good reason why they don’t need a warrant.  Of course, police can search all sorts of things without a warrant, and the solicitor general had argued that cell phones were not that different than briefcases or purses that are regularly searched when you enter a federal building or an airport.

Chief Justice Roberts said: “Cellphones differ in both a quantitative and a qualitative sense from other objects that might be kept on an arrestee’s person.” He went on at length to describe the differences, noting that a cellphone can reveal more private information than the search of an entire house. The phone contains “the sum of an individual’s private life” he said; searching it without a warrant is constitutionally unreasonable. The chief justice’s response to the government’s warning that a warrant requirement would impede law enforcement was basically a shrug: “Privacy comes at a cost.”

What we learned is that Supreme Court justices now have and use smart phones.

The best line yesterday came on the NBC Nightly News when Brian Williams, followed the report by asking the reporter if this will have any effect on the NSA’s ability to electronically dig into our cell phone records without warrants.

That Brian Williams is a real comedian.

Thursday, May 29, 2014 - First Quarter GDP and Extreme Weather

Financial Review with Sinclair Noe

DOW + 65 = 16,698
SPX + 10 = 1920
NAS + 22 = 4247
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.44%
OIL + .79 = 103.51
GOLD – 2.70 = 1256.90
SILV + .02 = 19.14

The economy was worse than expected in the first quarter. The first estimate of first quarter gross domestic product showed 0.1% growth. Today, we got the second estimate and it showed 1.0% contraction. We figured the second estimate would show contraction but most estimates were calling for just 0.1% to 0.6% contraction. The newly revised estimate incorporates additional economic data released in recent weeks. Higher-than-expected imports and slower-than-expected inventory growth dragged the economy into negative territory.

US based corporations posted slightly lower, after tax, seasonally adjusted, first quarter profits of $1.88 trillion for the quarter, down from $1.905 trillion in the fourth quarter; but those numbers were not adjusted for inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments; we know corporations are still holding bloated inventories. A big buildup in private inventories boosted economic growth in the third quarter of 2013, but left a hangover that weighed on growth in the first quarter of 2014. Inventories subtracted 1.62 percentage points from GDP growth, compared with an initial estimate of 0.57 percentage point subtracted from growth.

Business investment declined at a 1.6% pace, revised from an initially estimated decline at a 2.1% pace. Spending on structures fell at a 7.5% pace and spending on equipment fell at a 3.1% rate. Investments in intellectual property, like research and development, rose at a 5.1% pace.

Consumer spending grew at a 3.1% pace in the first quarter, revised up from an initial estimate of growth at a 3% pace. Spending on services, like health care and household heating, grew at a 4.3% pace while spending on physical goods rose at a more modest 0.7% pace.

The housing market was a drag in the first quarter and the revisions didn’t create much change; residential fixed investment contracted at a 5% pace, a little better than the original estimate of a 5.7% decline, and that subtracted 0.16% from GDP.

Exports fell at a 6% pace in the first three months of the year, not as bad as the initial estimate of 7.6%, but imports, which are subtracted from the GDP calculation, rose at a 0.7% pace, compared with the initial estimate that they declined at a 1.4% pace. Net exports subtracted 0.95 percentage point from GDP growth.

Total government spending subtracted 0.15 percentage point from GDP for the quarter, compared with an initial estimate of 0.09 percentage point subtracted from growth. Federal spending added to GDP, state and local government spending subtracted slightly from GDP.

So, it was a nasty GDP revision but don’t worry, be happy because it was weather related and the winter storms and polar vortexes have passed; gray skies have cleared up, put on a happy face. One headline today tries to tell us: “Why the GDP Drop Is Good for the US Economic Outlook”; the thinking is that there is pent-up demand; consumers and businesses will brush off their cabin fever and rush out to buy and sell. Another headline tries to maintain perspective by reminding us that: “The US Economy Had a Hiccup, Not a Heart Attack”; which is almost a valid point; this wasn’t a heart attack, but it wasn’t a hiccup either. That article says, “This isn’t a recession or even the beginning of a recession though.” True, but this is how recessions start, with economic contraction, but this isn’t a recession.

The economy changes slowly, even though economic numbers jump up and down, and the numbers can be tricky. For example, in October 2008, the numbers on the economy showed GDP had dropped 0.3%, not nearly as bad as today’s number. Back in 2008, Lehman Brothers collapsed and the politicians said we faced a global financial meltdown.

Back in May 2007, the markets looked a lot like they do today, very low volatility, troubling signs for housing stocks, and a stock sector rotation that suggested the bull market was long in the tooth. That bull market ran for 5 more months. Whether investors knew it or not, they were incurring a large risk for only a few percent reward.

The numbers don’t always reflect the scene on the street. Maybe they do, but more than likely, this is not the start of a new recession. This is how recessions start and the strange part is how most economists are just glossing over this as if it were nothing but a hiccup, when it actually represents billions of dollars; one percent of a $17 trillion dollar economy; some hiccup.

The blame is squarely placed on the weather without acknowledging that the weather is undergoing massive change, not just the polar vortex of winter, but let’s look at the wildfires of spring, and the drought of summer. The “weather effect” is not likely a one and done. The United States is currently engulfed in one of the worst droughts in recent memory. More than 30% of the country experienced at least moderate drought as of last week's data. In seven states drought conditions were so severe that each had more than half of its land area in severe drought. Severe drought is characterized by crop loss, frequent water shortages, and mandatory water use restrictions.

While large portions of the seven states suffer from severe drought, in some parts of these states drought conditions are even worse. In six of the seven states with the highest levels of drought, more than 30% of each state was in extreme drought as of last week, a more severe level of drought characterized by major crop and pasture losses, as well as widespread water shortages. Additionally, in California and Oklahoma, 25% and 30% of the states, respectively, suffered from exceptional drought, the highest severity classification. Under exceptional drought, crop and pasture loss is widespread, and shortages of well and reservoir water can lead to water emergencies.

Drought has had a major impact on important crops such as winter wheat. Just 29% of the entire US wheat crop is rated good to excellent; very poor to poor ratings are 78% in Oklahoma, 67% in Texas and 59% in Kansas. And even though much of Texas received rain in the past week, it may be a case of too little, too late. With the crop now heading out, there's not much hope for any recovery as we move deeper into the season. That likely means higher prices for your daily bread. Pasture land across the West is in generally poor shape; that likely means higher beef prices, which you’ve probably already noticed.

In the Southwest, concerns are less-focused on agriculture and more on reservoir levels. In Arizona, reservoir levels were just two-thirds of their usual average. In New Mexico, reservoir stores were only slightly more than half of their normal levels. And Nevada is the worst of all, with reservoir levels about one-third of normal.

The situation in California may well be the most problematic of any state. The entire state is suffering from severe drought, and 75% of all land area was under extreme drought. Restrictions on agricultural water use has forced many California farmers to leave fields fallow. At the current usage rate, California has less than two years of water remaining. And we know California is responsible for about half the nation’s fruit and vegetable supply.

This past February, US food prices jumped 0.4% — the largest one-month increase since September 2011. Then they jumped another 0.4% in March. Then another 0.4% in April. Fruit and vegetable prices rose even faster, at a 0.7% clip in April. The US Department of Agriculture says the California drought doesn’t seem to have affected vegetable prices so far this year and the agency isn’t predicting a catastrophic spike in food prices just yet. The USDA projects that food price inflation will be between 2.5% and 3.5% in 2014. That's higher than the rise last year, but it's in line with the long-term average of 2.8%.

There are a couple of reasons why we might not get hit in the wallet this year: farmers are shifting water use from some crops to others, cutting back on some crops, like corn and alfalfa that might be available from other places. This strategy is tricky; for example, California dairy farms depend on alfalfa for feed; if they have to import feed, it could increase dairy prices in the short term. Also, farmers are pumping groundwater. The problem is the aquifers are being depleted, even sinking in some cases, and losing their original capacity. In the short term, we adapt; but if the drought continues, next year could be a bear.

Commodity markets already have weathered record cold in the US that sent natural-gas futures to five-year highs and severe drought in Brazil that has nearly doubled coffee prices. Now meteorologists are predicting even more abnormal weather, thanks to the return of El Nino, a rapid and prolonged warming of the tropical Pacific Ocean, which disrupts normal weather patterns and would exacerbate the extreme climatic events already affecting many markets this year. Meteorological agencies say there is a 60% to 70% chance of El Nino occurring by the end of 2014, and a more than 50% chance it will arrive earlier, by this summer.

It's a significant event in commodities markets because El Nino affects weather patterns virtually everywhere. Past occurrences brought dry weather to West Africa, damaging the region's cocoa crop, and wet weather to Brazil, delaying the coffee and sugar harvests. India typically sees less rain in its monsoon during an El Nino year, which can mean smaller grain and cotton crops. In the US, El Niño could bring much needed rain to the southwest and California. If it comes.

But El Nino is not necessarily good news for commodity prices on a global scale; it tends to help soybean crops but harm corn, wheat and rice crops. And also remember that El Nino refers to an extreme weather event. When El Nino hit in 1997 it claimed an estimated 2,100 lives and caused $33 billion damage to properties.

No matter which way you look, the forecast calls for extreme weather, and that means the first quarter GDP wasn’t just a hiccup.

Tuesday, April 15, 2014 - Yellen in the Lions' Den

Financial Review with Sinclair Noe

DOW + 89 = 16,262
SPX + 12 = 1842
NAS + 11 = 4034
10 YR YLD - .01 = 2.62%
OIL - .22 = 103.83
GOLD – 24.20 = 1303.40
SILV - .41 = 19.66

Stocks were all over the place today. We started with triple digit gains for the Dow Industrials, dipped to triple digit losses, then back into positive territory for the close with the major indices closing just below their morning highs. This kind of volatility does not engender confidence; it does warrant caution.

The utilities sector gained 1.3% and finished ahead of the other groups, extending its YTD gain to 11.8%; the biotech ETF added 1%, while the broader healthcare sector advanced 1.1%.Tech stocks have been beaten up quite a bit over the past couple of weeks. The Nasdaq 100 Tech Index (NDXT) is down 7% since April 1st. The Nasdaq Composite has exhibited weakness, but not to the point of meeting the definition of a correction; it would take a slide to 3,922 to mark a 10% fall from the March 5 closing high at 4,357; a 10% pullback from the March 6 intraday high of 4,371 would be achieved at 3,934.

The Labor Department’s Consumer Price Index, or CPI, increased 0.2% in March after posting a 0.1% increase in February. Excluding volatile food and energy prices, core prices ticked up 0.2%.Prices rose 1.5% for the 12 months ending in March. That is up from February’s year-over-year reading of 1.1%. Core prices moved up 1.7% over the 12 months, up from 1.6% in February.

A major factor in both headline and core CPI in March was a 0.3% increase in shelter costs. On an annual basis, housing costs were up 2.7%, the fastest pace in six years. The indexes for medical care, used cars and airline fares also increased in March. Apparel prices rose for the first time this year. Household furnishings and recreation prices dipped in the month. Real or inflation-adjusted hourly wages, meanwhile, fell 0.3% in March to $10.31. Real wages have risen 0.5% over the past 12 months. So, we’re not seeing wage-push inflation.

The big difference has been housing; shelter costs account for a full third of the basket of goods and services tracked in the consumer price index. In the past year, consumer prices excluding shelter have risen just 1%, an indication that inflation pressures are subdued outside of housing.

The old rule of thumb was that rents and utilities combined should not take up more than 30% of household income. A new study by Zillow finds 90 cities where the median rent, not including utilities, was more than 30 percent of the median gross income. A study by Harvard finds that nationally, half of all renters are now spending more than 30% of their income on housing, up from 38% of renters in 2000. Part of the reason for the squeeze on renters is simple demand; between 2007 and 2013 the United States added, on net, about 6.2 million tenants, compared with 208,000 homeowners.

For many middle and lower income people, high rents choke spending on other goods and services, impeding the economic recovery. Low-income families that spend more than half their income on housing spend about a third less on food, 50% less on clothing, and 80% less on medical care compared with low-income families with affordable rents.

Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen is scheduled to go to the lion’s den tomorrow, making a speech before the Economic Club in New York. Today, Yellen took the show on the road, speaking to a banking conference in Atlanta, she said current rules on how much capital banks must hold to protect against losses don't address all threats. She said the Fed's staff is considering what further measures might be needed, and such measures would likely apply to only the largest and most complex banks. Yellen said the Fed would review the likely effects of imposing stricter rules on banks. That probably plays better in Atlanta than Manhattan.

At some point Yellen must press the case of the Fed as regulator and in control of the banks rather than vice versa. Now, any threat or hint of threat at tighter control is only likely to result in the big banks moving risky behavior into less regulated areas of the financial system. These areas are often called the shadow banking system.

One area of concern for Yellen and her Fed colleagues is the short-term debt markets. So, Yellen would like to see the banks hold more capital; the idea being that it would make them less susceptible to a run. Now, when you hear that the Fed Chair is concerned about a bank run, this is not the old fashioned bank run, with customers lined up at the door of Bedford Savings and Loan and Jimmy Stewart trying to persuade his neighbors that their long-term loans will provide sufficient liquidity to short-term needs.

The problem goes to an area of regulation overlooked, or perhaps neglected by Congress and the various regulators; specifically derivatives; and after the collapse in 2008 what the regulators did was to concentrate the risk of the derivatives among four major Wall Street banks; the big banks just got bigger.

If you’ve ever stood in a teller’s line at the bank, you may have noticed the FDIC sticker, which reads, “Backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government.” Effectively, that means, if the assessments the FDIC charges the banks to meet the needs of the Deposit Insurance Fund run short, the taxpayer must prop up the fund to make insured depositors whole. On top of that promise, the National Depositor Preference statute came into being in the US in 1993, making all deposit liabilities at insured depository banks preferred over the claims of other creditors.

The serious wrinkle in the plan is that if one of the four largest banks in terms of derivative exposure was put into receivership by the FDIC, its derivative counterparties have the legal right to assert a super-priority claim on the liquid assets of the bank, jumping in front of depositors. Typically, the counterparties start grabbing their collateral before the public is even aware of the problem.

The Deposit Insurance Fund probably has about $40 billion in assets. With the Dodd-Frank prohibition against further taxpayer bailouts of banks, where would the FDIC turn to stem a run on one of the largest banks?

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the FDIC, acting as a conservator or receiver for an insured depository institution, has the right to “disaffirm or repudiate any contract or lease.” But here again, Wall Street has the FDIC between a rock and a hard place. Let’s say there was a reenactment of 2008 and Citigroup was sliding toward insolvency. If the FDIC repudiated Citigroup’s derivative contracts, it would set off a panic and contagion at the other three largest banks holding trillions in derivatives, creating an even larger financial tab for the Deposit Insurance Fund to meet. Banks taking deposits of public funds are required to pledge collateral against any funds exceeding the deposit insurance limit of $250,000. But derivative claims are also secured with collateral, and they have super-priority over all other claimants, including other secured creditors. The money is gone before you get to the teller’s window.

But before you lose any sleep over the prospects of another, potentially far worse global financial meltdown, take solace that the economy is recovering. There are a few more jobs, and consumers are spending, and the housing market is improving, and the Fed has been pumping money into the economy to foster this growth of credit. Right?

Well, one of the lessons we’ve learned in the recovery is that there is a difference between credit growth and economic growth. And absent real and sustainable economic growth a gap eventually forms as credit growth expands. The more one spends on a place of shelter the less one has to spend on other things, and overall demand is reduced. Bank lending finances the purchase of existing assets, particularly with reference to real estate. Such existing asset finance does not directly stimulate investment or consumption, but it drives up asset prices, and that leads lenders and borrowers to believe that even more credit is both safe and desirable. The expansion is like a rubber band that can only stretch so far.

So, it seems the greatest danger to the current economy are the very mechanisms that are still used to “fix” the last financial crisis: money-printing and asset-purchases by major central banks around the world that unleashed a global flood of liquidity for over five years. Most of this massively huge pile of cash has landed in the laps of banks, institutional investors, hedge funds, private equity firms, and other speculators has not been used to boost lending to the private, and thus has not contributed to the recovery of the real economy. Instead, it has been poured into financial assets and has artificially goosed their valuations.

This money sloshing through the system and the persistence of zero-interest-rate policies have driven desperate investors ever further out into “all risky asset classes,” including emerging assets, junk-rated corporate credit, Eurozone peripheral debt, and equities. That buying pressure has inflated their valuations even further. And in the emerging markets, it led to an appreciation of exchange rates.

And when the rubber band breaks, there will be a derivatives bet on it. When the derivatives default, the counterparties, operating in an unregulated shadow banking world of their own design, do not have sufficient capital to pay off the derivatives bet, and so the first thing they’ll do is raid the bank vaults, and when that dries up, the short-term credit markets freeze, because none of the counterparties have faith that the other party has any more in capital reserves than they have.

QE III: Pushing On A String

Initially, the stock market interprets inflation as a positive, as price increases on goods sold fall to the bottom line. Subsequently, rising costs wipes out all benefits of inflation to companies.

It has now been two weeks since Ben Bernanke announced that he would join European Central Bank President Mario Draghi in unleashing unlimited printing at a monthly rate of $85 billion dollars to save the economy [read asset prices] from further deterioration. Unfortunately, the cure does not match the true disease.

The S&P 500 Index closed September 27, at 1,447.15, up 13.83 points, but, lower than the September 13 close of 1,459.99, when the Federal Reserve Board Chairman held his news conference. Thursday's price action was achieved with the market positively and enthusiastically embracing a spotty economic report, the announcement of a new budget by Spain, and the news item that China had injected more stimulus money into its softening economy.

The nominal effect is tantamount to pouring a third cup of Starbucks coffee down a drunk to sober him. Actually, evidence of diminishing returns from various stimuli programs had been seen in earlier macroeconomic data.

The Commerce Department reported Thursday orders for goods meant to last at least three years, excluding demand for airplanes and automobiles, fell 1.6% last month after a 1.3% decrease in July. Total bookings plunged 13%, the most since January 2009, attributed to a decline in demand for civilian aircraft.

Also reported by the Commerce Department, the U.S. economy expanded at a 1.3% annual rate, the slowest pace since the third quarter of 2011 and down from last month's 1.7% estimate.

The Labor Department said new claims for unemployment benefits fell to 359,000 last week from an upwardly revised 385,000 the week prior. Claims were expected to fall to 378,000 from an initially reported 382,000.

Helping the upbeat mood of the market on Thursday, according to CNBC, China's central bank injected a net 365 billion Yuan ($57.92 billion) into money markets this week, reportedly, the largest weekly injection in history.

Mr. Bernanke promised to keep interest rates down for institutions and mortgage seekers by purchasing mortgage-backed securities at the expense of savers. This program ignores altogether other forms of outstanding debt weighing down consumers such as revolving and non-revolving lines of credit and student loans, which now stand at over one trillion dollars.

According to a Pew Research Center analysis of newly available government data published today, 19% of the nation's households owed student debt in 2010, more than double the number in 1989, and more than 15% that owed student debt in 2007. The Pew Research analysis also reported that 40% of all households headed by someone younger than age 35 owe such debt.

Some of the more salient statistics from the Pew research analysis include; the average outstanding student loan balance increased from $23,349 in 2007 to $26,682 in 2010. Most debtor households had less than $50,000 in outstanding student debt in 2010, but the share of households owing elevated amounts has increased.

In 2007, 10% of student debtors owed more than $54,238. By 2010, that number had risen to more than $61,894. Interestingly, average household indebtedness fell from $105,297 in 2007, to $100,720 in 2010.

Every remedy seriously discussed and/or enacted since 2008 by the federal government or the Federal Reserve Bank in the wake of the Great Recession has been a top-down solution. Most of the problems Congress, the White House, and the Feds addressed required a bottom's up approach to succeed long-term in helping Main Street. Avoiding this reality, addressing total household debt servicing requirements and a sharp drop in disposable income, was at the core of their failure in rescuing the economy.

Case in point, real estate; Washington DC, pushing trillions of taxpayers' dollars through the banks over the last four years, hoping that the dollars would find their way to individual mortgage borrowers and rehabilitate the national economy, has proven to be a squander of time, effort, and resources, given the skimpy results.

A simpler and more effective approach would've been for the government to utilize the treasury auction one time to issue $50 billion in 30-year bonds, with a 3% coupon, and refinance 250,000 mortgages at $200,000 each month. Over the last four years millions of home owners would have been better served with this approach and at a fraction of the cost to taxpayers, versus the many cumbersome and failed homeowner relief programs Washington tried.

Instead we are being tortured with an L-shaped recovery, consisting of lethargic growth, flat tax revenue receipts, and stubbornly high unemployment figures, unknowingly, for as far as the eye can see.

What about those underwater mortgages? Any difference between the original mortgage amount and the newly appraised value of the home could be split from the new mortgage (as in a second) and would become a tax obligation to the borrower over 30 years.

With this approach, many of the tens of thousands of entrepreneurs that went out of business in 2009 and 2010 would have found their shops located in neighborhoods with homeowners struggling less, or not at all, making their mortgage obligation and finding a few hundred dollars extra each month in their pockets to spend.

Lastly, making these new mortgages assumable, as in days gone by, and GNMAs, would have given the real estate market natural buoyancy during a period of free fall. Backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, institutions could then legally purchase this new debt.

This bottom-up rescue would have lowered borrowers' monthly mortgage payments, paid off the original mortgage, saved bankers (they got the money, anyway) holding dubious collateral, and preserved contract law, while stimulating the economy.

The dollars' velocity would be rising instead of falling at this point in time in this recovery. More importantly, by quickly reducing the amount of debt per household and increasing household disposable income in the darkest days of 2009 and 2010, the true disease afflicting consumer spending then and today - lack of demand from truncated disposable income - would have significantly reversed that deficit.

Besides, the government had already guaranteed some 3 trillion dollars in money market funds in the dark days of 2008, so, did it matter if this money was guaranteed before or after it entered the bloodstream of our financial system?

But I digress.

Applying traditional economic stimuli to a changed economic system we are now learning is unproductive. The superstructure of the western financial system, forged during the depths of the Great Depression, has mutated over the past 30 years by a shift in political and social culture, financial product innovation, and retirement planning choices.

Since 2008, the post-World War II economic and financial ecosystem has been completely modified by both governments and their central banks and corporations, during crises after crises, to the benefit of industry and corporations, and at the expense of national economies and individual households, worldwide.

The 70% consumer driven U.S. economy, the world's largest single economy, is a product of the 20th century. The economy has not responded robustly to QE I, QE II, Operation Twist, and now, so far, to QE III, as policymakers apply outdated remedies for an economy that no longer exists.

The economy has, however, drifted listlessly, from misdiagnosing and mismanaging treatment. Archaic monetary policy tragically is, ultimately, unproductive in guiding outcomes desperately being sought by politicians and economists. We are traveling down a new economy road without a road map.

For long-term investors, there is no mystery to the disease afflicting the U.S. economy; we are living in a complex world plagued with 21st century globalization. The extreme ends of inputs for the marketplace to create opportunities, produce output, and generate wealth, are in fundamental conflict with each other and our expectations and sensibilities imported from the 20th century.

Whether the conflict is over wealth accumulation, labor and productivity, return on capital, education, natural resources, innovation and technology, or geopolitical rights of ownership, this clash between the past and the future economic systems will establish along the way new winners and losers.

Once upon a time, there was a financial theory called a business cycle. It quantified economic activity, measuring and marking its circumference from trough to peak to trough as one complete revolution. And, from this business cycle winners and losers were recognized by the marketplace. Somewhere along the way, we discarded the notion of recession as a natural and healthy part of this business cycle.

Historically, whenever central banks began pushing on a string with monetary policy, attempting to stimulate demand where none naturally exists, first stagflation, then inflation, occurs. This develops whenever the marketplace is prevented from deciding winners and losers.

Initially, the stock market interprets inflation as a positive, as price increases on goods sold fall to the bottom line. Subsequently, rising costs wipes out all benefits of inflation to companies.

The 32 year-old bull market in bonds is in its final weeks. The policies that set it in motion three decades ago, compelling interest rates to fall - no tolerance and complete vigilance to fighting inflation, are no longer recognized as prudent policies. The consequences of loose monetary policy can be seen appearing on the horizon.

Around the world, governments are struggling, in varying degrees, with escalating inflation from drought, scarcity of supply, debased currencies, and local conflict and violence inhibiting the free flow of goods.

How long can the U.S. bond market avoid these realities going forward is anyone's guess. At some point, however, bond investors will stare into the abyss recalculating risk and the time value of their money.

The unprecedented amount of funds that have flowed into fixed income investments since 2008 will reverse and regrettably, take many, sophisticated and unsophisticated investors alike, out to sea as the tide rolls away.

This summer's rally began June 4, at 1,278.18, which was induced by horrible May economic data, thus, anticipating QE III. Now that unlimited quantitative easing has arrived, central banks around the world are all in, where will the economy and fundamental global change take the market and investors' capital next?

To seek higher investment ground, investors should reduce exposure to fixed rate income investments and begin looking for variable rate fixed income products for long-term income. Also, the stocks to consider, if you must buy stocks, are essential companies such as: AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ), Google (GOOG), IBM, Exxon Mobil (XOM), Chevron (CVX), Disney (DIS) and Microsoft (MSFT), core companies that will only go out of business if society ceases to function as we know it today.

As inflation rises, it will be hard assets including gold, up 6.4% for the month and for the quarter 14.6%, and silver, up a sparkling 12.2% for the month, and for the quarter over 31.5%, farmland, natural resources, energy, companies that manage the new digital world and essential basic services, that cannot be re-produced on two-dimensional printers, which will retain their value.

Slipping Into Darkness

From October 29, 2008

The Federal Reserve Board today, at 2:15 pm, announced their obligatory 50 basis point cut of the Federal Funds Rate, from 1.5 per cent to 1 per cent. This is the latest action taken to assuage investors’ fears about the hydra-bear market that has engulfed all capitalism. A triple digit rally was quickly vaporized with an erroneous General Electric rumor concerning the company’s 2009 earnings.

What are not mistaken rumors are the disastrous economic data that continues to flow. On Tuesday came the U.S. consumer confidence index, by the Conference Board, reporting an all time low of 38, down from 68 the previous month. That same day, the S&P Case-Shiller home price index fell 1 per cent, in August from July, and 16.6 per cent, from the previous year. The Census Bureau estimates for the 3rd quarter of 2008, of some 130 million housing units, nationwide, 18.6 million stand empty; 13.8 million year-round, 4 million for rent, and 2.2 million for sale.

On Wednesday, Durable Goods Orders were reported a curved up .8 per cent versus an expected decline of 1.8 per cent. For Thursday, the October 25th week Initial Jobless Claims are announced. Expect a drop of 3,000. Why, I’m not sure.

A General Motors -Chrysler shotgun merger is one step closer to happening, according to reports. If completed, it may add an additional 25,000 auto blue and white collar auto workers to the unemployment line of fixed income investment bankers recently cashiered.

Employment is rising, however, in villages and hamlets across the land as Investment Advisors and Money Managers are deploying their minions to hotel banquet rooms and restaurant’s private cubby holes, armed with clever four-color handouts, PowerPoint Presentations, and empty explanations, as to why their propriety indicators and models could not see the greatest bear market since the Great Depression, sneak up behind them.

I have a feeling that the traditional holiday feathered vertebra – turkey; will not be served this Thanksgiving. Instead, investors will be dining, if they can still afford a meal, on black swan; only recently very, very popular fowl of spenders of others-peoples-money. Of course, it’s too late to sale stocks with portfolios down 30 to over 50 per cent. But, if these Money managers are wrong again, keep some Gray Goose handy.

Thursday Market Action

Add to Technorati Favorites

After shaking off a worrisome inflation report before the opening bell and a dismal real estate report soon after the opening, the Dow rose steadily throughout the morning and settled into positive territory for the remainder of the day. The DJIA closed up 82.97 or .72 per cent at 11,615.93. The S & P 500 also closed higher 7.10 or .55 per cent to 1,292.93. NASDAQ likewise ended the day up 25.05 or 1.03 per cent to 2,453.67.

Volume on the NYSE was 1,003,398,038; advancing shares were 663,931,108 and declining shares were 332,074,290 with 7,392,640 unchanged. NASDAQ volume was 1,842,236,076; 1,414,017,121 shares were up, 358,110,252 were down, and 70,108,703 were unchanged.

Bond yields fell and prices rose as the market digested the early morning four week average jobless claims number which increased by 19,500 to 440,500 and the and a much higher consumer price number of 5.6 per cent, year over year. The Two-Year Note closing yield was 2.43 percent; the Ten Year Note was 3.89 per cent; and the Thirty Year Bond was 4.51 percent.

Foreclosures were up 55 per cent from a year ago, July. More than 272,000 homes received at least one notice, compared to 175,000 last July. This was eight per cent higher than June, as reported by RealityTrac. Lenders reprocessed 77,000 homes in July.

Existing home sales fell 16 per cent to 4.91M, annualized, in the 2nd quarter while prices fell 7.6 percent to $206,500 from $223,500 last year. One in three home sales was a short sale or sold out of foreclosure, according to the National Association of Realtors.

Crude oil finished the day at $114.70 a barrel and Gold closed at $807.4 an ounce.