Morning in Arizona

Morning in Arizona
Rainbows over Canyonlands - Dave Stoker

The Headline Animator

Showing posts with label gross domestic product. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gross domestic product. Show all posts

Friday, March 27, 2015

The New Normal

Financial Review

The New Normal


DOW + 34 = 17,712
SPX + 4 = 2061
NAS + 27 = 4891
10 YR YLD – .06 = 1.95%
OIL – 3.01 = 48.42
GOLD – 5.70 = 1199.40
SILV – .13 = 17.07

Modest gains on Wall Street today, but not nearly enough to make up for the four previous days of losses. It wound up being the second-worst week for the market so far this year. The Dow Jones industrial average remains down slightly for 2015, and the Standard & Poor’s 500 index is essentially flat. For the week, the S&P 500 fell 2.2 percent, the Dow lost 2.3 percent and the Nasdaq declined 2.7 percent. The semiconductor sector was a leader today after a report that Intel is in talks to buy rival chipmaker Altera. Intel shares were up 6%; Altera shares were up 28%.

Gross domestic product expanded at a 2.2 percent annual rate last quarter. This was the Commerce Department’s third estimate of GDP, and it was unchanged from last month’s estimate.  Economic growth cooled in the fourth quarter and after-tax corporate profits recorded their biggest drop since early 2011, as a strong dollar dented the earnings of multinational corporations. The fourth quarter GDP was down from a very strong third quarter reading of 5% growth. The first estimate on the first quarter will be published April 29th.

Profits originating outside the U.S. dropped by $36 billion in the fourth quarter, the biggest decrease since 2008 and the second-biggest since 2002. This would be money earned by big multinational companies, as well as any business that sells goods and services abroad. Profits from the rest of the world accounted for the smallest share of total corporate earnings since 2006 and have been on the downswing for years. Meanwhile profits from domestic industries rose by $5.7 billion in the last three months of 2014. While that’s not stellar, it was weighed down by a drop in earnings of financial companies. Non-financial industries reported a rise in profits of $18.1 billion. Much of the rest of the world is seeing a slowdown, but here in the US, the economy has been getting stronger. As a share of the total economy, corporate profits were just a hair below the record high of 10.5% set in 2013.

Consumer spending rose at a 4.4% annual pace in the fourth quarter, up from an earlier estimate of 4.2% and the fastest pace since the first quarter of 2006. Spending on goods rose at a 4.8% rate versus an earlier estimate of 4.5%. Spending on services grew at a 4.3% pace, up from the earlier estimate of 4.1% and the fastest pace since the second quarter of 2000.

U.S. consumer sentiment dropped in March. The Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan’s final March reading on the index was 93. It was down from the previous month’s reading of 95.4 but beat estimates of 92. Consumer optimism reached a 10-year peak of 95.5 in the first quarter of 2015, its highest level since 2004.

Last week the Federal Reserve FOMC changed their stance on interest rate hikes; they went from “patient” to “not in a hurry”. And for the past week, Fed policymakers have gone out and made speeches, usually saying that the Fed will probably raise interest rates sometime this year. Today, Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen delivered a speech in San Francisco, entitled “The New Normal in Monetary Policy”. Yellen said she expects “conditions may warrant an increase in the federal funds rate target sometime this year.” The timing of a rate hike will be data dependent; Yellen said, “The actual path of policy will evolve as economic conditions evolve, and policy tightening could speed up, slow down, pause, or even reverse course depending on actual and expected developments in real activity and inflation.”

With labor markets looking set to improve further, and one-time downward pressure on inflation likely to dissipate, a “modest” rate rise would be unlikely to undercut the recovery. So, to translate: the drop in oil prices is probably temporary; things are getting better; the Fed will hike rates; slowly. Unless everything unexpectedly goes to hell in a hand basket.

Saudi Arabian-led airstrikes on Yemen and a potential nuclear deal with Iran would have little near-term impact on oil supplies; so says Goldman Sachs in an overnight note to clients. Goldman analysts say they “expect both events to have negligible near-term supply impacts, with the build in crude inventories set to continue in 2Q15. Longer term, a deal with Iran could lead to greater OPEC supplies although the timing of the sanction relief remains uncertain.”

I’m so glad the analysts at Goldman have figured out this mess, because they are the only ones. Let’s review: In Syria, the U.S. is fighting against Iran and is an enemy of Iran, which supports Hezbollah and the government of Bashar al-Assad. In Syria, the U.S. is also fighting with Iran against ISIS. In Iraq we are fighting with Iran against ISIS, except this week when US warplanes provided air cover to Iranian-backed militias in Tikrit, a joint effort against ISIS; the Iranian backed militia decided they didn’t want to participate. It sounds complicated but it might help to think of it in terms of Shia versus Sunni. For example, Saudi Arabia bankrolled several Sunni insurgency groups against Shias in Syria for several years, including a group that eventually became ISIS, which became a bit too extreme.

So now Saudi Arabia, which represents the Sunni side, is having to battle against the kind of Sunni extremism represented by ISIS, which means they are on the same side as Iran, which represents the Shia side. And in Yemen, now we are backing Saudi Arabia and Egypt and a coalition against rebel forces reportedly, though not definitively backed by Iran; but we say we aren’t going to get deeply involved. We’ll just kind of assist with some intelligence. While at the same time, major diplomatic negotiations are underway in Switzerland with Iran over their nuclear program and sanctions, while we continue to fight against them in Yemen and Syria, and fight with them in Syria and Iraq.

So, that takes us back to Goldman Sachs’ conclusion that this is all going to be nothing more than a short-term disruption and everything will be worked out over time. Maybe the thinking is that everyone will be so confused, we’ll just take a nap. And the price of oil jumped nearly 5% yesterday and then dropped more than 5% today. If you can make sense of it all, you are either delusional or you might be an oil analyst for Goldman. Or both.

Greece submitted a long-awaited list of structural reforms to its creditors today as its government warned it would stop meeting debt obligations if negotiations failed and aid was not forthcoming. Greece’s international economic affairs minister, Euclid Tsakalotos, raised the stakes, saying while Greece wanted an agreement it was prepared to go its own way “in the event of a bad scenario”.

He told the Guardian: “We are working in the spirit of compromise, we want a solution, but if things don’t go well you have to bear the bad scenario in mind as well. That is the nature of negotiations.”

The reforms apparently do not include cuts to pensions and salaries. Greek government aides said: “The government is not going to continue servicing public debt with its own funds if lenders do not immediately proceed with the disbursement of funds which have been put on hold since 2014. The country has not taken receipt of an aid instalment from the EU or IMF since August 2014 even though it has habitually fulfilled its obligations.”

Officials from the European Central Bank, the EU, and the International Monetary Fund are expected to respond to the Greek reform proposals on Monday. They say nothing focuses the mind like the threat of execution in the morning.

Despite its revenues falling 6%, JPMorgan has retained its crown as the top performing investment bank in 2014, according to industry analytics firm Coalition. JPMorgan pulled in $22 billion from investment banking last year, compared with $23.3 billion in 2013. Other U.S. banks also continued to dominate top spots, with Goldman Sachs coming second overall across investment banking, and Citigroup and BofA sharing third place with Deutsche Bank.

Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to give away all his wealth after paying for the college tuition of his 10-year-old nephew. “You want to be the pebble in the pond that creates the ripple for change,” Cook stated. Fortune Magazine estimates Cook’s net worth, based on his holdings of Apple stock, at about $120 million. He also holds restricted stock worth $665 million if it were to be fully vested.

Back in the 1970s the Hunt Brothers, Nelson and Herbert – sons of a Texas oil billionaire, started buying up silver; they bought mining shares, physical silver, and futures contracts. The brothers were estimated to hold one third of the entire world supply of silver (other than that held by governments). They were trying to corner the market. And for a while it worked; the price of silver climbed from $6 an ounce to nearly $49. In January 1980, the Comex changed its rules on margin. The Hunt brothers had borrowed heavily to finance their purchases, and as the price began to fall, they were unable to meet their obligations. The brothers were on the hook for about $1.7 billion in losses; a panic hit the markets, not just the silver market, it spread to stocks and commodities and other futures. A consortium of banks stepped in to bail out the Hunt Brothers. That panic occurred on Thursday, (Silver Thursday) March 27, 1980; 35 years ago today. The Hunt Brothers lost about $1 billion dollars, but they avoided criminal charges. The price of silver didn’t approach $50 an ounce until thirty one years later in 2011.

It was bound to happen… Willie Nelson is launching his own brand of weed. Yes, after being a longtime proponent and enthusiast of marijuana, Nelson is looking to get into the business of actually selling it. The product is called Willie’s Reserve, and it could be available to the public as early as 2016. It will also be distributed through physical stores, which Nelson and his family hope to open up across the US in states that’ve legalized marijuana.

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Thursday, May 29, 2014 - First Quarter GDP and Extreme Weather

Financial Review with Sinclair Noe

DOW + 65 = 16,698
SPX + 10 = 1920
NAS + 22 = 4247
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.44%
OIL + .79 = 103.51
GOLD – 2.70 = 1256.90
SILV + .02 = 19.14

The economy was worse than expected in the first quarter. The first estimate of first quarter gross domestic product showed 0.1% growth. Today, we got the second estimate and it showed 1.0% contraction. We figured the second estimate would show contraction but most estimates were calling for just 0.1% to 0.6% contraction. The newly revised estimate incorporates additional economic data released in recent weeks. Higher-than-expected imports and slower-than-expected inventory growth dragged the economy into negative territory.

US based corporations posted slightly lower, after tax, seasonally adjusted, first quarter profits of $1.88 trillion for the quarter, down from $1.905 trillion in the fourth quarter; but those numbers were not adjusted for inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments; we know corporations are still holding bloated inventories. A big buildup in private inventories boosted economic growth in the third quarter of 2013, but left a hangover that weighed on growth in the first quarter of 2014. Inventories subtracted 1.62 percentage points from GDP growth, compared with an initial estimate of 0.57 percentage point subtracted from growth.

Business investment declined at a 1.6% pace, revised from an initially estimated decline at a 2.1% pace. Spending on structures fell at a 7.5% pace and spending on equipment fell at a 3.1% rate. Investments in intellectual property, like research and development, rose at a 5.1% pace.

Consumer spending grew at a 3.1% pace in the first quarter, revised up from an initial estimate of growth at a 3% pace. Spending on services, like health care and household heating, grew at a 4.3% pace while spending on physical goods rose at a more modest 0.7% pace.

The housing market was a drag in the first quarter and the revisions didn’t create much change; residential fixed investment contracted at a 5% pace, a little better than the original estimate of a 5.7% decline, and that subtracted 0.16% from GDP.

Exports fell at a 6% pace in the first three months of the year, not as bad as the initial estimate of 7.6%, but imports, which are subtracted from the GDP calculation, rose at a 0.7% pace, compared with the initial estimate that they declined at a 1.4% pace. Net exports subtracted 0.95 percentage point from GDP growth.

Total government spending subtracted 0.15 percentage point from GDP for the quarter, compared with an initial estimate of 0.09 percentage point subtracted from growth. Federal spending added to GDP, state and local government spending subtracted slightly from GDP.

So, it was a nasty GDP revision but don’t worry, be happy because it was weather related and the winter storms and polar vortexes have passed; gray skies have cleared up, put on a happy face. One headline today tries to tell us: “Why the GDP Drop Is Good for the US Economic Outlook”; the thinking is that there is pent-up demand; consumers and businesses will brush off their cabin fever and rush out to buy and sell. Another headline tries to maintain perspective by reminding us that: “The US Economy Had a Hiccup, Not a Heart Attack”; which is almost a valid point; this wasn’t a heart attack, but it wasn’t a hiccup either. That article says, “This isn’t a recession or even the beginning of a recession though.” True, but this is how recessions start, with economic contraction, but this isn’t a recession.

The economy changes slowly, even though economic numbers jump up and down, and the numbers can be tricky. For example, in October 2008, the numbers on the economy showed GDP had dropped 0.3%, not nearly as bad as today’s number. Back in 2008, Lehman Brothers collapsed and the politicians said we faced a global financial meltdown.

Back in May 2007, the markets looked a lot like they do today, very low volatility, troubling signs for housing stocks, and a stock sector rotation that suggested the bull market was long in the tooth. That bull market ran for 5 more months. Whether investors knew it or not, they were incurring a large risk for only a few percent reward.

The numbers don’t always reflect the scene on the street. Maybe they do, but more than likely, this is not the start of a new recession. This is how recessions start and the strange part is how most economists are just glossing over this as if it were nothing but a hiccup, when it actually represents billions of dollars; one percent of a $17 trillion dollar economy; some hiccup.

The blame is squarely placed on the weather without acknowledging that the weather is undergoing massive change, not just the polar vortex of winter, but let’s look at the wildfires of spring, and the drought of summer. The “weather effect” is not likely a one and done. The United States is currently engulfed in one of the worst droughts in recent memory. More than 30% of the country experienced at least moderate drought as of last week's data. In seven states drought conditions were so severe that each had more than half of its land area in severe drought. Severe drought is characterized by crop loss, frequent water shortages, and mandatory water use restrictions.

While large portions of the seven states suffer from severe drought, in some parts of these states drought conditions are even worse. In six of the seven states with the highest levels of drought, more than 30% of each state was in extreme drought as of last week, a more severe level of drought characterized by major crop and pasture losses, as well as widespread water shortages. Additionally, in California and Oklahoma, 25% and 30% of the states, respectively, suffered from exceptional drought, the highest severity classification. Under exceptional drought, crop and pasture loss is widespread, and shortages of well and reservoir water can lead to water emergencies.

Drought has had a major impact on important crops such as winter wheat. Just 29% of the entire US wheat crop is rated good to excellent; very poor to poor ratings are 78% in Oklahoma, 67% in Texas and 59% in Kansas. And even though much of Texas received rain in the past week, it may be a case of too little, too late. With the crop now heading out, there's not much hope for any recovery as we move deeper into the season. That likely means higher prices for your daily bread. Pasture land across the West is in generally poor shape; that likely means higher beef prices, which you’ve probably already noticed.

In the Southwest, concerns are less-focused on agriculture and more on reservoir levels. In Arizona, reservoir levels were just two-thirds of their usual average. In New Mexico, reservoir stores were only slightly more than half of their normal levels. And Nevada is the worst of all, with reservoir levels about one-third of normal.

The situation in California may well be the most problematic of any state. The entire state is suffering from severe drought, and 75% of all land area was under extreme drought. Restrictions on agricultural water use has forced many California farmers to leave fields fallow. At the current usage rate, California has less than two years of water remaining. And we know California is responsible for about half the nation’s fruit and vegetable supply.

This past February, US food prices jumped 0.4% — the largest one-month increase since September 2011. Then they jumped another 0.4% in March. Then another 0.4% in April. Fruit and vegetable prices rose even faster, at a 0.7% clip in April. The US Department of Agriculture says the California drought doesn’t seem to have affected vegetable prices so far this year and the agency isn’t predicting a catastrophic spike in food prices just yet. The USDA projects that food price inflation will be between 2.5% and 3.5% in 2014. That's higher than the rise last year, but it's in line with the long-term average of 2.8%.

There are a couple of reasons why we might not get hit in the wallet this year: farmers are shifting water use from some crops to others, cutting back on some crops, like corn and alfalfa that might be available from other places. This strategy is tricky; for example, California dairy farms depend on alfalfa for feed; if they have to import feed, it could increase dairy prices in the short term. Also, farmers are pumping groundwater. The problem is the aquifers are being depleted, even sinking in some cases, and losing their original capacity. In the short term, we adapt; but if the drought continues, next year could be a bear.

Commodity markets already have weathered record cold in the US that sent natural-gas futures to five-year highs and severe drought in Brazil that has nearly doubled coffee prices. Now meteorologists are predicting even more abnormal weather, thanks to the return of El Nino, a rapid and prolonged warming of the tropical Pacific Ocean, which disrupts normal weather patterns and would exacerbate the extreme climatic events already affecting many markets this year. Meteorological agencies say there is a 60% to 70% chance of El Nino occurring by the end of 2014, and a more than 50% chance it will arrive earlier, by this summer.

It's a significant event in commodities markets because El Nino affects weather patterns virtually everywhere. Past occurrences brought dry weather to West Africa, damaging the region's cocoa crop, and wet weather to Brazil, delaying the coffee and sugar harvests. India typically sees less rain in its monsoon during an El Nino year, which can mean smaller grain and cotton crops. In the US, El NiƱo could bring much needed rain to the southwest and California. If it comes.

But El Nino is not necessarily good news for commodity prices on a global scale; it tends to help soybean crops but harm corn, wheat and rice crops. And also remember that El Nino refers to an extreme weather event. When El Nino hit in 1997 it claimed an estimated 2,100 lives and caused $33 billion damage to properties.

No matter which way you look, the forecast calls for extreme weather, and that means the first quarter GDP wasn’t just a hiccup.