QE III: Pushing On A String

Initially, the stock market interprets inflation as a positive, as price increases on goods sold fall to the bottom line. Subsequently, rising costs wipes out all benefits of inflation to companies.

It has now been two weeks since Ben Bernanke announced that he would join European Central Bank President Mario Draghi in unleashing unlimited printing at a monthly rate of $85 billion dollars to save the economy [read asset prices] from further deterioration. Unfortunately, the cure does not match the true disease.

The S&P 500 Index closed September 27, at 1,447.15, up 13.83 points, but, lower than the September 13 close of 1,459.99, when the Federal Reserve Board Chairman held his news conference. Thursday's price action was achieved with the market positively and enthusiastically embracing a spotty economic report, the announcement of a new budget by Spain, and the news item that China had injected more stimulus money into its softening economy.

The nominal effect is tantamount to pouring a third cup of Starbucks coffee down a drunk to sober him. Actually, evidence of diminishing returns from various stimuli programs had been seen in earlier macroeconomic data.

The Commerce Department reported Thursday orders for goods meant to last at least three years, excluding demand for airplanes and automobiles, fell 1.6% last month after a 1.3% decrease in July. Total bookings plunged 13%, the most since January 2009, attributed to a decline in demand for civilian aircraft.

Also reported by the Commerce Department, the U.S. economy expanded at a 1.3% annual rate, the slowest pace since the third quarter of 2011 and down from last month's 1.7% estimate.

The Labor Department said new claims for unemployment benefits fell to 359,000 last week from an upwardly revised 385,000 the week prior. Claims were expected to fall to 378,000 from an initially reported 382,000.

Helping the upbeat mood of the market on Thursday, according to CNBC, China's central bank injected a net 365 billion Yuan ($57.92 billion) into money markets this week, reportedly, the largest weekly injection in history.

Mr. Bernanke promised to keep interest rates down for institutions and mortgage seekers by purchasing mortgage-backed securities at the expense of savers. This program ignores altogether other forms of outstanding debt weighing down consumers such as revolving and non-revolving lines of credit and student loans, which now stand at over one trillion dollars.

According to a Pew Research Center analysis of newly available government data published today, 19% of the nation's households owed student debt in 2010, more than double the number in 1989, and more than 15% that owed student debt in 2007. The Pew Research analysis also reported that 40% of all households headed by someone younger than age 35 owe such debt.

Some of the more salient statistics from the Pew research analysis include; the average outstanding student loan balance increased from $23,349 in 2007 to $26,682 in 2010. Most debtor households had less than $50,000 in outstanding student debt in 2010, but the share of households owing elevated amounts has increased.

In 2007, 10% of student debtors owed more than $54,238. By 2010, that number had risen to more than $61,894. Interestingly, average household indebtedness fell from $105,297 in 2007, to $100,720 in 2010.

Every remedy seriously discussed and/or enacted since 2008 by the federal government or the Federal Reserve Bank in the wake of the Great Recession has been a top-down solution. Most of the problems Congress, the White House, and the Feds addressed required a bottom's up approach to succeed long-term in helping Main Street. Avoiding this reality, addressing total household debt servicing requirements and a sharp drop in disposable income, was at the core of their failure in rescuing the economy.

Case in point, real estate; Washington DC, pushing trillions of taxpayers' dollars through the banks over the last four years, hoping that the dollars would find their way to individual mortgage borrowers and rehabilitate the national economy, has proven to be a squander of time, effort, and resources, given the skimpy results.

A simpler and more effective approach would've been for the government to utilize the treasury auction one time to issue $50 billion in 30-year bonds, with a 3% coupon, and refinance 250,000 mortgages at $200,000 each month. Over the last four years millions of home owners would have been better served with this approach and at a fraction of the cost to taxpayers, versus the many cumbersome and failed homeowner relief programs Washington tried.

Instead we are being tortured with an L-shaped recovery, consisting of lethargic growth, flat tax revenue receipts, and stubbornly high unemployment figures, unknowingly, for as far as the eye can see.

What about those underwater mortgages? Any difference between the original mortgage amount and the newly appraised value of the home could be split from the new mortgage (as in a second) and would become a tax obligation to the borrower over 30 years.

With this approach, many of the tens of thousands of entrepreneurs that went out of business in 2009 and 2010 would have found their shops located in neighborhoods with homeowners struggling less, or not at all, making their mortgage obligation and finding a few hundred dollars extra each month in their pockets to spend.

Lastly, making these new mortgages assumable, as in days gone by, and GNMAs, would have given the real estate market natural buoyancy during a period of free fall. Backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, institutions could then legally purchase this new debt.

This bottom-up rescue would have lowered borrowers' monthly mortgage payments, paid off the original mortgage, saved bankers (they got the money, anyway) holding dubious collateral, and preserved contract law, while stimulating the economy.

The dollars' velocity would be rising instead of falling at this point in time in this recovery. More importantly, by quickly reducing the amount of debt per household and increasing household disposable income in the darkest days of 2009 and 2010, the true disease afflicting consumer spending then and today - lack of demand from truncated disposable income - would have significantly reversed that deficit.

Besides, the government had already guaranteed some 3 trillion dollars in money market funds in the dark days of 2008, so, did it matter if this money was guaranteed before or after it entered the bloodstream of our financial system?

But I digress.

Applying traditional economic stimuli to a changed economic system we are now learning is unproductive. The superstructure of the western financial system, forged during the depths of the Great Depression, has mutated over the past 30 years by a shift in political and social culture, financial product innovation, and retirement planning choices.

Since 2008, the post-World War II economic and financial ecosystem has been completely modified by both governments and their central banks and corporations, during crises after crises, to the benefit of industry and corporations, and at the expense of national economies and individual households, worldwide.

The 70% consumer driven U.S. economy, the world's largest single economy, is a product of the 20th century. The economy has not responded robustly to QE I, QE II, Operation Twist, and now, so far, to QE III, as policymakers apply outdated remedies for an economy that no longer exists.

The economy has, however, drifted listlessly, from misdiagnosing and mismanaging treatment. Archaic monetary policy tragically is, ultimately, unproductive in guiding outcomes desperately being sought by politicians and economists. We are traveling down a new economy road without a road map.

For long-term investors, there is no mystery to the disease afflicting the U.S. economy; we are living in a complex world plagued with 21st century globalization. The extreme ends of inputs for the marketplace to create opportunities, produce output, and generate wealth, are in fundamental conflict with each other and our expectations and sensibilities imported from the 20th century.

Whether the conflict is over wealth accumulation, labor and productivity, return on capital, education, natural resources, innovation and technology, or geopolitical rights of ownership, this clash between the past and the future economic systems will establish along the way new winners and losers.

Once upon a time, there was a financial theory called a business cycle. It quantified economic activity, measuring and marking its circumference from trough to peak to trough as one complete revolution. And, from this business cycle winners and losers were recognized by the marketplace. Somewhere along the way, we discarded the notion of recession as a natural and healthy part of this business cycle.

Historically, whenever central banks began pushing on a string with monetary policy, attempting to stimulate demand where none naturally exists, first stagflation, then inflation, occurs. This develops whenever the marketplace is prevented from deciding winners and losers.

Initially, the stock market interprets inflation as a positive, as price increases on goods sold fall to the bottom line. Subsequently, rising costs wipes out all benefits of inflation to companies.

The 32 year-old bull market in bonds is in its final weeks. The policies that set it in motion three decades ago, compelling interest rates to fall - no tolerance and complete vigilance to fighting inflation, are no longer recognized as prudent policies. The consequences of loose monetary policy can be seen appearing on the horizon.

Around the world, governments are struggling, in varying degrees, with escalating inflation from drought, scarcity of supply, debased currencies, and local conflict and violence inhibiting the free flow of goods.

How long can the U.S. bond market avoid these realities going forward is anyone's guess. At some point, however, bond investors will stare into the abyss recalculating risk and the time value of their money.

The unprecedented amount of funds that have flowed into fixed income investments since 2008 will reverse and regrettably, take many, sophisticated and unsophisticated investors alike, out to sea as the tide rolls away.

This summer's rally began June 4, at 1,278.18, which was induced by horrible May economic data, thus, anticipating QE III. Now that unlimited quantitative easing has arrived, central banks around the world are all in, where will the economy and fundamental global change take the market and investors' capital next?

To seek higher investment ground, investors should reduce exposure to fixed rate income investments and begin looking for variable rate fixed income products for long-term income. Also, the stocks to consider, if you must buy stocks, are essential companies such as: AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ), Google (GOOG), IBM, Exxon Mobil (XOM), Chevron (CVX), Disney (DIS) and Microsoft (MSFT), core companies that will only go out of business if society ceases to function as we know it today.

As inflation rises, it will be hard assets including gold, up 6.4% for the month and for the quarter 14.6%, and silver, up a sparkling 12.2% for the month, and for the quarter over 31.5%, farmland, natural resources, energy, companies that manage the new digital world and essential basic services, that cannot be re-produced on two-dimensional printers, which will retain their value.

Investing through the summer fog of 2012

The economy continued to throw off mixed signals for the month of July, whipsawing traders and making investors even more squeamish and paranoid about where to tuck their wealth.

Added to this seesaw of economic data from everything from July's consumer confidence of 65.9, up from a revised 62.7; the July Chicago PMI of 53.7 up from 52.9.

The May S&P Case-Shiller HPI 20-city M/M rose 0.9%, however, the Yr/Yr fell 0.7%. The June New Home Sales figure fell to 350k from a revised up 382,000. The M/M Pending Home Sales Index for June dropped -1.4% from a revised downward 5.4% increase.

The Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index for July fell from -3 to -17. Conversely, the Empire State Manufacturing Survey, Kansas City Fed Manufacturing Index, Philadelphia Fed Survey all improved from the previous month.

The Dallas Fed Manufacturing Survey, consisting of a Business Activity Index and Production Index, found both indexes falling.

The knowledge that short-term markets are driven first by news headlines and central bank policies rather than primarily macro and macroeconomic data forces a perverse reaction onto the market in this unfamiliar climate we find our capital in.

Deteriorating economic statistics brings hope, by some, of additional stimulus measures from the Feds. Today, August 1, the Feds may shed some light onto their contingency plans, if there are any plans, for supporting a decaying economy between now and the November elections.

If Quantitative Easing III (QE III) or some variation of yield repression doesn't materialize from the Feds, markets will have an excuse to move lower, decaying as well.

Secondly, European Central Bank President, Mario Draghi, kicked off last Thursday's stock market rally by stating that he will do whatever it takes to save the Euro. A quick recap; in theory, generally, saving the Euro and the EU requires capping rising Spanish and Italian debt yields by the ECB agreeing to purchase their sovereign debt.

Because of inflationary fears, many German politicians, including Chancellor Angela Merkel's coalition government, vigorously oppose this action and similar bailout schemes. Two days ago, Monday, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner met with German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble and Mario Draghi, reaffirming their commitment in solving this crisis.

On Thursday, the European Central Bank will hold another policy meeting to find common ground. If the meeting fails to produce the proper response in the eyes of the market, this too will reverse last week's rally and send the market lower.

A third item that will send stocks lower in August, extending the S&P 500 incarceration in the current trading range between 1,099 and 1,419, if the realization sinks in of the draconian effects of federal budget automatic sequestration.

When austerity begins appearing in budgeting decisions in government, and workers begin preparing for possible layoffs and downsizing by reducing personal spending, and when businesses relying on government contracts to purchase their goods and services recalculate their cash flow and revenue, GDP will decline.

The May 2012, G.19 Federal Reserve Statistical Release, dated July 9th, shows "consumer credit increased at an annual rate of 8 percent in May. Revolving credit increased at an annual rate of 11-1/4 percent, while non-revolving credit increased at an annual rate of 6-1/2 percent." It's hard to imagine this type of credit activity continuing in the third and fourth quarters of 2012.

Our anemic economy grew 1.5% in the second quarter, down from 2.0% in the first quarter, with major help from consumer credit. Subtracting significant credit in the third and fourth quarters will exacerbate any weakness.

Individual savings rates were reported up 4.3%, annualized, in the first three months of this year, starving an already malnourished economy of vital disposable income. The minuscule interest currently being paid on savings is also problematic for an economy in need of greater money supply velocity.

An economically weakened Europe and a weakening China will inadvertently push the US economy over the edge unless smaller emerging markets can somehow re-accelerate the global economy while avoiding the developed nations' debt contagion.

The final culprit with the motive and opportunity to assassinate the economy is stagflation. As 2012 futures' prices on corn, oats, soy beans, and wheat reached multiyear highs, 1,300 counties spread over 29 Midwest states have been declared natural disaster areas by the USDA.

In the 1970's, President Richard M. Nixon imposed wage and price controls in an attempt to snuff out stagflation and inflation. President Gerald Ford attempted to talk down inflation with a Whip Inflation Now (WIN) campaign, complete with WIN buttons. Inflation ran rampant throughout the 1970's until a new Sheriff rode into town in 1979.

The newly appointed Federal Reserve Board Chairman, "Tall" Paul Volcker, ended inflation by jacking up short-term interest rates to 22%. Although, lifting interest rates to nosebleed levels induced at the time the deepest recession since the Great Depression, inflation did not return.

Another smart decision made by the government at the time was issuing callable long-dated treasury bonds and zero coupon bonds to minimize interest expense. This morning, Treasury announced it is investigating issuing floating rate notes; while interest rates are lower than they have been in the past 100 years. I'm puzzled by such a decision.

This earnings' season, restaurants such as McDonalds (MCD), Chipotle (CMG), Buffalo Wild Wings (BWLD), have admitted to struggles with cost inputs, missing earnings estimates, and are now lowering guidance for upcoming quarters. Food suppliers like Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL), Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN), and Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) are experiencing these headwinds, as well.

Brent Crude oil is priced north of $100 dollars a barrel. Members of OPEC require the price of oil to stay north on $80 dollars a barrel to maintain political stability at home. That price level is in conflict with jump-starting the global economy that is continuing to deleverage from the previous decade.

Regardless, if the price of oil should rise or fall short-term, the global economy will be petroleum-based for decades to come. Therefore, an essential building block for any inflation defensive portfolio requires an integrated oil company such as Exxon Mobile (XOM) or Chevron (CVX).

One final thought; although, we have experienced deflation in many things since 2008, technology, of course, real estate and virtually any asset requiring financing, and the cost of capital itself, this economic period will end, too. And once more, we will again face and fight inflation.

Unappreciated is the two-stage intermediate step between deflation and inflation – stagflation. Ben Bernanke has spent years and trillions of dollars attempting to re-inflate asset prices. One day he will succeed. At that point, Stage One, the rising cost of living, or cost-push inflation kicks in, whereby, too few dollars are available for rising prices.

Stage two of the stagflation equation is flat wages and personal income. Whether one draws a paycheck from a job or clip coupons from investments, purchasing power begins contracting, not growing.

This reality of less disposable income relative to prices, combined with an aging population and extended life expectancy is a recipe for structural economic arrested development until we surrender to full-blown inflation in future years.

Politicians will feel obligated to rectify the former condition and then, the more radical and dangerous phase of inflation occurs, demand-pull, leading to too many cheapened dollars chasing too few goods.

Confidence or the lack thereof, in a nation's currency, is the thin line straddling inflation and hyperinflation.

And, it is here, that your portfolio of hard assets such as gold and silver, agricultural commodities providing food security, natural resources such as land, timber, water, energy, selective adjustable rate debt, and very selective stocks, will pay off for the patient, long-term, investor during inflationary times.

Here Comes 2011

Welcome to 2011, the year of the Long-Term Evolution (LTE), A.K.A., G4 wireless connectivity. Only Verizon Wireless is offering it as I write this, but only through USB Modems.  Smartphones will be out later this year; so it’s here but just not available now to change your life.

The promised upgrade in broadband, whether we want it or can afford it, is a perfect metaphor for the upcoming collision between economic reality and political machinations.  One of three things will happen as the 112^th Congress is sworn in; a) it will continue business as usual, b) it will change spending in Washington DC, or c) our creditors will take away our charge card. America is unprepared for all three. Choice b would be not to raise the federal debt – much easier said than done. Choice a will debase the Dollar and cause inflation before the second leg of the 2008 Depression starts (Oh, and you thought we were pass that crisis?).

In 2010, the big winner was gold and silver amongst other commodity products. Below are finviz.com charts showing 1 year, 6 months, 3 month returns of the major futures markets. Silver was up 83.5% and Gold was up 29.5%. Stock averages trailed; The Russell 2000 was up 26.3%; NASDAQ 100 was up 19%; the S&P 500 was up 12.9%, followed by the DJIA, which was up 11.2%.

The 30-year Treasury Bond was up 5.6% for the year and the 10-year Note was up 4.2%. The US Dollar was up 1.2%. However, December was unkind to the 10-Year Note, as it lost 3% and the 30-Year Bond lost 4.2%.

On Monday, the stock market blasted off into triple digit territory, closing up 93 points. Optimism was everywhere in the air, not to mentioned an extra 850 billion in tax cuts to goose prices. I believe the DJIA will cross 14,000 this year and the S&P 500 will also cross 1450. The market will be wildly overvalued at that point, as the market is currently only recklessly overvalued, with more potential headwinds in the second half of the year from a slowing Chinese economy, a double-dip recession in Europe, and housing bubble collapses in Australia and Canada.

Gold and silver was savaged this Tuesday morning; February Comex gold last traded down $44.60 at $1,378.30 an ounce. Spot gold last traded down $36.40 at $1,378.50. The London P.M. gold fix was $1,388.50 versus the previous P.M. fixing of $1,405.50.  Silver futures for March delivery fell $1.617, or 5.2 percent, to $29.508 an ounce, I expect a consolidation period could last until the spring. This will range-bound gold’s price to $1,300 to $1,500.

Cost-Push inflation is being reflected in oil and food prices. Gasoline is now over $3.00 a gallon, on its way to $4-$5 a gallon this year. This inflationary pressure will weigh on a fragile consumer’s pocketbooks, therefore, GDP growth. Higher prices, combined with city and state firings of employees (layoffs is when you have a chance of getting your old job back) suggests higher unemployment and increase the chances a double-dip recession by the end of the year.

Fed Chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, has openly expressed a desire to inflate asset prices while holding down inflation on the theory that not doing so will reopen the door to deflation.

The minutes to the December 14^th FOMC policy meeting was released today which said in part, “While the economic outlook was seen as improving, members generally felt that the change in the outlook was not sufficient to warrant any adjustments to the asset-purchase program, and some noted that more time was needed to accumulate information on the economy before considering any adjustment,”.

Only a neurosurgeon’s scalpel could be so precise. In my view, we can only wait to see which of the Fed’s missions will fail.

Conventional Wisdom is propagating that the private sector will ride to the rescue of the economy and President Obama’s reelection. Why would they? Demand is absent in the marketplace for goods in all but the luxury segment. Even the low-end retail segment is fading. Bottom-up stimulation is being withdrawn from the economy as state budgets, which spend locally, are being slashed, unmercifully.

If American business was serious in creating jobs here in America, they would be demanding trade protectionists’ measures to protect American workers. Once upon a time, business and the Chamber of Commerce did such things. Sadly, if we update the year by a decade, as the Eagle’s sang in their song Hotel California, “We haven’t had that spirit here since 1969”.

Below are my 2010 predictions with comments. Four of my predictions were right, three were too early, and four missed the mark. Without government intervention, my record would be eight out of eleven.  The take away is I was too conservative in my thinking which err on the on the side of caution for investors. Since the economy and the financial markets are disconnected like never before, and the government’s heavy hand has all but destroyed real price discovery, analyzing what is happening and predicting the consequences of those findings are becoming more and more a fool’s errand.

2010 Predictions	Result	Comments
I. The bond market will suffer its worst lost since 1994.	Wrong	Too early. The bond market began selling off in the 4th quarter. QE II artificially suppressed interest rates.
II. Gold will surpass $1,800.00 per oz.	Wrong	Too early. The direction was right, the magnitude was off. It went from $1,100 to $1,421 or 29.5%.
III. The Democratic Party will lose the House and barely retain the Senate.	Right	Bingo.
IV. The FDIC will temporarily run out of funds to shut down bad banks.	Wrong	The FDIC left open 900 bad banks otherwise they would run out of funds.
V. At least two states will default on their general obligation bond interest payments, roiling the municipal bond markets.	Wrong	Too early. The municipal train wreck will occur this year.
VI. Either, Tim Geithner, Lawrence Summers, of Ben Bernanke, will leave the administration before 2011.	Right	Lawrence Summers, bye bye.
VII. State and Federal taxes will rise in 2010.	Wrong	Silly me. I thought politicians would do the right thing instead of extending the Bush tax cuts.
VIII. Inflation will rise above 5% at least one quarter in 2010.	Wrong	Prices are rising but it is not being reflected in the CPI. Stay tuned.
IX. The yearly high for stocks will occur in the first half of the year.	Wrong	Quantitative Easing II (QE II) saved the stock market.
X. At least one western democratic government will fail and be replaced with another democratically elected government.	Right	The UK and Australia
XI. Residential real estate prices will drift lower YOY on the S&P Case-Shiller HPI	Right	Year-on-year, sales are up 0.2% for the 10-city adjusted index but are down 0.8% for the 20-city index

Should the Feds Create Inflation? This Time It Is Different

Through the bombs bursting in the Korean Peninsula’s air, minutes of the FOMC meeting were released Wednesday. The division over Quantitative Easing II (QE II) wasn't as intense as the 58 year old NoKo/SoKo conflict. However, I have reservations with this logic in 2010 of affirmative voting Fed members’ confidence behind QE II theory of inflating asset prices will put a halt to deflation. 

That QE II will create a wealth effect and stimulate consumer spending, the easy stuff like the dubious weekly Jobless Claims dropped to 407,000 from a previous week upward revision to 441,000, from 439,000 is showing a positive trend. 

Also, The Reuter's/University of Michigan's Consumer sentiment index rose for November to 71.6 and third quarter GDP growth was revised up to a 2.5% annual growth from an estimate of 2.4%. The hard stuff, physical things like durable goods and housing (found below) tell a different story. Durables orders in October fell 3.3 percent, a figure below the median market forecast decline of 0.1%.  

Unfortunately, the Fed’s beautifully elegant thesis isn’t growing inside a sealed petri dish with exact ingredients from the 1930’s or 1970’s. Therefore, past performances do not guarantee future results.  

For those of us old enough to remember the 1970’s it was a far different world. During that period, current dollars had greater purchasing power than holding them until tomorrow, so it was logical for consumers to spend money immediately. However, the basic financial infrastructure for consumers was the opposite of what it is today. 

Take credit cards; this was a relatively new consumer product. Interest rates were fixed, unlike today. Shoppers would hand their credit card to a merchant and the merchant would pick up the phone and call an authorization center for approval. Then, the card would be placed in a manual charge card machine to make an impression on carbon paper for the shopper to sign after approval was granted. 

Holding and servicing fixed debt during “normal” inflationary times is easier to do if incomes are rising, mirroring the change in inflation. Virtually every credit card issued today has a variable rate. Wages have been stagnant in the US for ten years and Ireland just announced an austerity plan which includes cutting minimum wage which could become a harbinger of things to come in America. 

If we experience prolong inflation, the interest rate on consumer debt will be adjusted upward to cover issuers rising costs, accordingly. This will cancel any presumed benefits for creating inflation. 

Mortgages were different then, too. Adjustable rate mortgages did not exist. When you purchased a 30-year fixed mortgage, you could plan for your next 360 mortgage payments. This became problematic during the real estate bubble of 2003-2007. Teaser rates tied to Prime, LIBOR, the 11^th district, T-bills, COSI, etc, that allowed borrowers to qualify disappeared after 12, 24, or 36 months. Real mortgage payments undermined the false real estate prosperity of the day.

In the 1970’s mortgages were also assumable in many instances. The fixed mortgage came with your home. Think what our current housing market would look like if residential real estate came with mortgages. Would housing markets have experienced 30%, 40%, 50% in value or more, with assumable loans attached? Is a house easier or harder to sell with an assumable mortgage? 

Maybe this is an opportunity for the Department of Treasury to self-refinance mortgages directly with borrowers. New Home Sales reported the average price fell 8.0 percent to $248,200 while sales of new homes which fell 8.1 percent to a much lower-than-expected annual unit rate of 283,000. The median price of a new home plunged 13.9 percent in October to $194,900, a seven year low. 

Existing home sales were even worse. Sales fell 2.2 percent in October to a 4.43 million annual unit rate. The year over year change is a staggering 25.9%. Supply on the market has returned to 10.5 months. The median price fell an additional six tenths to $170,500. The average price moved two tenths higher to $218,700. 

Consumers were protected in other ways. In 1980, Congress passed the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act exempting federally chartered savings banks, installment plan sellers and chartered loan companies from state usury limits. This effectively overrode all state and local usury laws. Heretofore, banks were limited by law as to what interest rate they could charge customers. 

Then, there was collective wage bargaining. The apex of organized labor existed in this time frame. For employees, price inflation was met with multi-year wage contracts, negotiated wage increases, and Cost Of Living Adjustments (COLA). Employers could better plan their labor costs and workers would not fall too far behind, too quickly. In retrospect, these automatic triggers helped exacerbated moderate inflation as it fulfilled structural price increases. 

Manufacturing as well as capital was neither nimble nor mobile in the pre-digital age. Employers were more inclined to sit down with workers and arrive at a schedule of wages and benefits both sides could live with. Relative labor peace in the US resulted from this tack verses a more confrontational civil disobedient approach on the European continent. 

The America I just described no longer exists. Instead of a fairly closed economic system capturing Ben Bernanke’s domestic asset price inflation action, the global economy will absorb our inflation, spilling into overheating emerging economies. This will cause resentment toward our predatory monetary policy. 

At home, stubbornly high unemployment continues as more hiring of temporary and contract workers identify firms that are practicing company before country, and a deteriorating financial system that is biting disproportionately into financially vulnerable consumers’ thinning disposable income. 

Municipalities are moving closer to default, just like Europe, under the weight of this radical redistribution upward of capital since the repeal of Glass-Steagall Act. The probability of a double-dip recession followed by uncapped interest rates and a widening chasm between Tiffany & Co. and Target customers, and rising corporate profits grows. 

The Ben Bernank offers other lesser reasons why QE II is necessary, such as a goal of optimal employment, without any major tax or infrastructure jobs initiatives coordinated with other quarters of government. I think their reasoning and aiming needs more work. 

The Market Is Just Not Into Main Street Anymore

August Commentary: The Market is Just Not into Us, Anymore

I’m reminded of the story about the recently deceased arriving at the gates of Heaven and being told that he has freedom of choice he may visit both Heaven and Hell before making his eternal decision. After visiting Heaven for the day he journeys down to Hell.

The most incredible party witnessed in history is going on. The most beautiful people he had ever seen were there. The finest food and drink from the four corners of the planet was being served. The greatest band he had ever heard played every one of his favorite songs and sounding never better, from each stage of his life.

The next morning he returned to Heaven, rendered his decision and apologized for choosing Hell, along with conveying his thanks for the heavenly hospitality.

Upon returning below, the music was gone; so too were the beautiful people and the fabulous food and drink. All that remained in the dark cave was coal, fire, shovels, and heat. When he demanded to know where everyone and everything went; Lucifer winked and replied:

“Yesterday, you were a prospect. Today, sir, you are my client.”

Throughout 2010, and for the last decade, equity returns have produced practically nothing for all its troubles. Then, why do investors continue tolerating an insane amount volatility and risk of principal, for punk rewards - we are holding on to a once profitable relationship that no longer exists.

There; it had to be said.

This 30-year affair between the American middle class and financial markets has been counterproductive over the previous decade. Analysts and money managers are like your mate’s best friend who looks straight into your eyes and lie to your face. “The relationship is fine.” “You are imagining things.” “Every relationship has its highs and lows; you two are experiencing a temporary low period, that’s all.” “You think you could do better without her?”

These examples mirrors a few mindless talking points investors hear bantered about each day on business channels, describing investors’ net worth reduction and why any concern, on your part, is totally unnecessary. Let’s recall how this relationship started by returning to the beginning of this latest chapter.

Wall Street was a rich man’s playground - until the inflationary 1970‘s. At that point, the rich stop buying stocks. P/Es on stocks fell to hat size levels. Prior to the stagflation and inflationary 1970’s, it mattered little that commissions were fixed and burley. The last secular bill market ran from 1950 to 1965. Potential brokers were invited and groomed, by white shoe firms, to introduce themselves to and to form relationships, with the affluent.

In 1962, self-employed individuals or unincorporated businesses became eligible to self-direct retirement accounts through Congressional legislation with the establishment of (Eugene) Keogh or HR (10) plans. Twenty years later, employers asked the same question, differently: Why shouldn’t employees have the same freedom to self-direct their retirement account (thereby, removing corporate responsibility for employees’ retirement).

The private sector, as late as the early 1980’s, offered new workers employer-sponsored defined benefit (DB) retirement plans. Investment risk and portfolio management are entirely controlled by the company. Payouts are calculated on factors such as salary and duration of employment. If there is a short-fall on investment returns, companies are obligated to dip into earnings to cover the difference.

Luckily, for corporations, bottom line margins and much of today’s $1.6 trillion in cash, sitting on the balance sheets of corporations, is safe from being encumbered by DB plans and their retirees.

DB plans are still owned by many public sector workers. Currently, these plans are routinely vilified in the press as parasitic in nature. Defined Contribution (DC) retirement plans, enthusiastically launched in the 1980’s as DB plan’s chief competitive product, and were sold primarily by ridiculing DB plans as being inferior to self-directed accounts. DC plans’ major weakness, an unknown future payout to retirees, became its major marketing strength.

Men with ambition, real men, theoretically, could make untold millions playing the stock market. Accepting a DB plan’s corset over unlimited retirement income potential was the providence of the dull-witted or the lazy, lacking in motivation, vision and imagination.

The tiny requirements for raking in bushels of filthy lucre, for your golden years, as the pitch went, were reading Peter Lynch books and by faithfully watching Louis Rukeyser’s Wall Street Week; “as you know, over time, all stocks increase in value.”

Because of the internal logic of DC plans’ supposition from 1980’s Wall Street, it was antithetical for Human Resource departments and mutual fund companies to argue, at the beginning of a secular bull market, in favor of capping pedestrian, formulaic, DB plan payouts. Unrestricted, free market-based, DC plans were vastly superior on every count.

Beside, where did DB plans’ returns really come from? They came from the stock market! Eliminate the middle man; keep for yourself all the returns your hard earned dollars generate in the stock market. Mr. Hare, meet Mr. Tortoise.

The accelerants fomenting this new mindset, when stocks such as Boeing, Walt Disney, Mattel, and many others, sold for $5 dollars a share or less, were de-regulated commissions, Merrill Lynch’s new Money Market Account, and Sears acquisition of Dean, Witter, Reynolds (now Morgan Stanley). Additionally, declining inflation and interest rates, tax cuts, and deficit spending, helped deliver to Wall Street the middle class aspiration of champagne wishes and caviar dreams.

Over the next 20 years it was a world wind affair with unbridled infatuation. Mutual fund sales loads were cut from 8.5% to 4.5%. Exchange privileges inside mutual fund complexes were established. Letters of Intent, reducing sales fees further, became standard. Investors began choosing stock investment over precious metals, over real estate, over all other asset classes.

Stock market DC plans, became the preferred method of saving for retirement. Dividend Reinvestment Plans (DRIP) and stock purchase plans, compounding returns, also became more popular, adding fuel to the roaring stock market fire. Owning equities were touted by every financial services company. Consequently, more workers chose DB plans, year after year, playing at the big boys table.

Fictional character Gordon Gecko became the Pontiff of American financial idolatry and fictional prosperity. In the late 1980’s, banks begin selling mutual funds and insurance; and vice versa. Charles Schwab introduce the no load mutual funds Fund companies created A, B, C, and D shares, offering various sales load configurations.

In the 1990’s, everyone made money playing the stock market. The beginning of online trading even made it easy to do. The WSJ ran a recurring article featuring a chimp throwing darts, selecting stocks, and comparing his returns with professional money managers. That’s when you know when you are in a secular bull market.

The 14-member investment club from Beardstown, IL, the Beardstown Ladies became national celebrities for reporting earning compound annual average returns of 23.4%, over 10 years, thru 1993 - until they were audited.

Their actual return was 9.1%. By 1997, the Ladies had upped their stock picking skills and annual average returns over 10-years increased to 15.3%, yet, they still lagged the S&P 500’s 10-year return, during this period, of 17.2%.

Yes, we were so in love with each other. Then, dark clouds appeared and forever changed the future – Glass-Steagall was repealed.

Early in the next decade, Wall Street’s wandering eyes caught a glimpse of augmented proprietary trading and underwriting fees. Enhanced leverage, donning smaller and more provocative capital reserves, heretofore, disapproved of among prudent men, became desirable and lusted after by all. Scandalous risk was in vogue.

Investors’ trading commissions and management fees were a competent and faithful, if somewhat, plain way for firms to earn revenue. It was like home cooking five nights a week and backyard grilling on the weekends – safe, predictable, fulfilling, and bland.

Conversely, trading the firm’s capital and collecting securitization fees was the long-legged, redheaded, man-eating, gorgeous knockout, swinging from your arm each night, walking into your favorite hangouts.

Are you still dollar-cost averaging into your funds? Maximizing 401k and IRA contributions? Sporadically purchasing round lots of a few hundred or a few thousand shares of stocks, at discounted prices? This was no longer enough for descendants of the Buttonwood Agreement.

Once Wall Street felt the rush from mainlining mortgage-backed securities, the relationship with John and Jane Q. Public was doomed.

Any hope of salvaging this fraying union ended in 2008. We were unsuccessful in getting American finance off the narcotic of toxic assets; kicking this addiction to fast money, infinite fees and profits, and nympholeptic bonuses. A clean and sober banking system, facing tough new regulations, would function properly, yet again.

Regrettably, the wrong crowd appeared to offer help – Buffett, Paulson, Geithner, Blankfein, Bernanke, and Geithner – peddling TARP, Quantitative Easing, credit facilities, and government guarantees.

Immediately, overnight loan orgies were being held at the Feds’ discount window. The decency of mark-to-market accounting was scoffed at and ignored. Banking hedonism ran amuck on the streets of Manhattan and through the halls of Congress. Someone had shot the sheriff and the deputy, too.

It’s over. In a world of globalization, high frequency trading, melt-ups, flash-crashes, and algorithms, Wall Street doesn’t need the American middle class anymore; Need proof? Here is a snapshot from the internet of an Investment Company Institute chart displaying flows into LT Mutual Funds thru 07/21/2010:

The stock market was up 7% in July despite the fact that equity mutual funds experienced outflows in each of the last 12 weeks.

Wall Street borrows pure, uncut, scratch – at 0% - directly from Mr. Big; Washington DC. Treasury auctions are co-dependent enablers of this bankrupt practice. There is no turning back. Investors will make the wrong choice during a flash crash or flash bounce and will lose.

Somehow, that someone is always John and Jane Q. Public.

Discerning Trends and Fluctuations From Direction and Volatility

There is a cornucopia of objective and subjective data flowing into the marketplace 24/7. Once out there, it’s twisted and molded into supporting or rejecting whatever narrative is being presented. It’s this world that we must employ all our analytical skills and investment experience to discern trends and fluctuations from direction and volatility.

On April 6th, it was reported in the New York Times from a story entitled “Upbeat Signs Revive Consumers’ Mood for Spending” the following statement:

The mood has gone from panicked to cautious, and now, as Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Economy.com put it, some consumers are “almost a bit giddy.”

On April 7th, The Federal Reserve Statistical Release G.19, Consumer Credit reported the following:

Consumer credit decreased at an annual rate of 5-1/2 percent in February 2010. Revolving credit decreased at an annual rate of 13 percent, and nonrevolving credit decreased at an annual rate of 1-1/2 percent.

Econoday published this analysis to explain the report:

Highlights

Well the rebound for consumer credit lasted only one month. Consumer credit fell a steep $11.5 billion in February, sinking hopes that January's increase would mark the end of the steepest consumer credit contraction on record. A $5.6 billion upward revision to January, to plus $10.6 billion, does take some of the sting out of February's contraction as do preliminary indications for strong retail sales in March. But February's data are bleak, showing a $9.5 billion contraction for revolving credit and a $2.0 billion contraction for nonrevolving credit. Tight credit standards together with the consumer's mood to save are not helping the economic recovery. Stocks showed little initial reaction to the report.

Market Consensus Before Announcement

Consumer credit outstanding in January rose $5.0 billion, breaking a record of 11 consecutive months of decline. The gain was led by a $6.6 billion rise in non-revolving credit (car loans, mobile homes, education, boats, trailers, vacations). But revolving credit (credit cards) still declined by $1.7 billion.

Finally, add into the mix, auto sales that were reported on April 1st, and again Econoday explains:

Highlights

Vehicle sales in March proved much stronger than February, the first solid indication of what looks to be a strong month for retail sales. Sales of domestic-made cars and light trucks rose to an annual unit rate of 8.8 million, up more than 15 percent vs. February's 7.6 million rate. Improvement was broad based among manufacturers but was centered at Toyota (TM) where aggressive incentives led to a major jump for the troubled manufacturer. New car sales make up about 12 percent of total retail sales. Gasoline sales, which make up about 10 percent, also look to be strong in March given gains for demand, seen in the weekly EIA petroleum inventory data, and gains in price, also posted weekly by the EIA. Chain stores will round out the retail picture for March when they post results next Thursday.

Market Consensus Before Announcement

Sales of domestic-made light motor vehicles in February dipped 2.2 percent to a 7.7 million unit annualized pace, largely on severe snow storms cutting into showroom traffic. Imports, however, fared worse, dropping 7.9 percent to 2.7 million units. The import share was hurt by Toyota's recall-related stoppage of sales on certain models. Combined domestics and imports were down 3.7 percent to 10.4 million units from 10.8 million in January. Deal making by competitors going after Toyota market share could boost overall sales in March.

Question: Why did the market tank at the close Wednesday, after the release of the G.19 report, when it was already known February was a poor month for consumer credit? Between 3:00 pm and 4:00 pm Wednesday, this was the most significant news to come out?

Also, how do you square Ben Bernanke’s testimony before congress explaining the to keep U.S. interest rates low because of a fragile economy when the day before Australia’s central bank increased their benchmark interest rate, by a quarter percent to 4.25%, the fifth time in six months, over fears of inflation, following China’s changing position on inflation and rising commodity prices?

Are the Feds conflating a residential real estate inventory problem with GDP growth? Can we see a further drop in home prices, an expansion in the economy, and miss the beginnings of a cyclical turn in inflation? Will policy and politics interfere with sound but tough economic choices in Washington DC? What warning signal is the debacle in Greece sending to the U.S.? Will Paul Volcker be heard by the administration on banking reform and will Larry Summers be leaving the circus through the revolving door to Wall Street?

Man, and you thought the Duke/Butler NCAA basketball final was a cliffhanger.

The Lazarus Rally in 2010

This week marks the one-year anniversary of the market bottom for stocks following the 2008 collapse of the supply-side themed western financial system. A deceased stock market, the second week in March 2009; the major averages resurrected themselves, like Lazarus, on a holy-water flood of liquidity, more than any other cyclical bull market bounce in history.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced March 9, 2009 to March 9, 2010, from a gut-wrenching 6,547.05 to 10,564.38. Likewise, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index moved from 676.53 to 1140.45. The NASDAQ 100 climbed from 1043.87 to 1,901.38, over the same 365 days. These returns equal a decade’s worth of historical gains.

To those investors, who grew feathers, and ran to the sidelines, take heart; in investing, there are lies, damn lies, statistics, and market returns. At the beginning of 2009, the DJIA started at 8,801.72, the S&P 500 Index at 902.99, and NASDAQ at 1,212.24. Only the luckiest of people and your typical liar coolly strolled into the market that second week in March last year, aggressively bought stocks, and are still holding those positions.

Closer to the truth, an experienced bull investor last March probably started taking profits off the table in early summer. Or, they screwed up their courage in April or May and bailed in September, or year end. Anyone capturing these once in a lifetime returns should be running full page ads of their trade confirms announcing the opening of their new hedge fund. And why not, they could afford the advertising rates. Unfortunately, 2009’s trend will be swapped for market fluctuation in 2010.

So, where do we go from here? The answer for the stock market is quite different from the answer about the economy. Let’s first look at the stock market.

Stocks will not repeat the performance of the last 12 months. The last 12 months was fueled on liquidity and promised future growth. The future is here but the growth is not. Wall Street Cardinals assigned to Washington DC, Ben Bernanke and Timothy Geithner, will be less helpful to stocks over the next 12 months.

U.S. Quantitative Easing has an expiration date on its existence. Some central banks have already begun raising rates because their economies are moving forward, unlike ours. The retail customer has yet to return to the market, either through their company’s retirement account (which is hard to do when you no longer work for a company), or taxable investment accounts; when your 1%-2% bearing CDs and T-Bills, and falling home values no longer contributes to your positive cash flow.

Also, investors are going through Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD). The dot.com bubble, the Enron era of scandals, the real estate depression, and 2008, has left baby boomers dazed and confused. They are reluctant to hop into the barrel one more time before retirement.

Despite paraphilic dispatches by CNBC anchors, reporters, and guests of an aroused recovery, to the contrary, the U.S. economy is impotent based on low tax receipts, high unemployment, and contracting housing prices and available credit. This is what occurs during a period of deleveraging.

Disposable income from the safest fixed income investments has all but disappeared. That retired couple that spent their 5%-6% interest from their fixed income portfolio to shop, to travel, and to dine has temporality lost over 70% of their purchasing power. Fewer transactions equals fewer sales taxes, in turn, equals less state and federal revenue. Becoming smaller becomes a vicious cycle.

In October and November of 2008, when extraordinary unilateral decisions were made to save the economy, two additional smaller adjustments would have made a huge difference; temporarily change the tax laws for five years, permitting individuals to write off all interest payments for credit cards, automobiles, etc. on their taxes, and to suspend for five years the provision in the Monetary Control Act of 1980 eliminating usury laws. Individuals would have extra cash inside their annual tax return and smaller monthly finance payments. How could banks complain since the Federal Funds target Rate was set December 16, 2008, at 0.00% -0.25%? Their return on borrowed capital is infinity.

Cities and states across the nation will become the biggest drag on the economy in 2010. Dramatic budget cuts to reduce a currently projected $180 billion shortfall are being debated for the 2010-2011 budgets, at this moment, thereby, violently truncating personnel and services.

Banks are still failing. The FEDS feel that they dare not raise interest rates without a very good reason. But, with banks not lending, or reducing credit lines to businesses, and credit cards rates were hiked before new banking credit cards laws were changed, I’m unsure who might be hurt by an increase. Top-down stimulus programs are inefficient and growing more unpopular. Both commercial and residential real estate are not improving And, the November elections will drive sagacity from public conversation.

Internationally, what we can see are sovereign debt problems and a suspect economy in Europe. Tensions growing in the Far East over; military bases, and now Toyota, with Japan; trade disputes and sanctions and political disagreements over Taiwan, Tibet, and Iran, with China. Plus, we have an amorphous exit strategy in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Adding up tapped out consumers, the continuation of deleveraging, near insolvent municipalities, and a gradual reduction of liquidity, what you have is a somber national economy with too few pockets of strength.

Traders relying on volatility and stock pickers that can hunt for appreciation will have several opportunities to feast, however, investors hoping for an expanding economy will soon wish for 2010 to be over with nothing but apples (AAPL) and chips (PEP) and cokes (KO) to snack on in the interim.

Replace Ben Bernanke with Paul Volcker

Last week, the Federal Reserve statistical release (G.17) reported on industrial production and capacity utilization for the economy.

“Industrial production rose 0.7 percent in September after an upwardly revised gain of 1.2 percent in August. For the third quarter as a whole, output advanced at an annual rate of 5.2 percent, the first quarterly gain since the first quarter of 2008 and the largest gain since the first quarter of 2005. Production in manufacturing increased 0.9 percent in September, and the index excluding motor vehicles and parts rose 0.5 percent. Mining output strengthened 0.7 percent, while the output of utilities fell 0.7 percent. At 98.5 percent of its 2002 average, total industrial production was 6.1 percent below its level of a year earlier. In September, the capacity utilization rate for total industry increased to 70.5 percent, a level 10.4 percentage points below its average for 1972 through 2008.”

The Los Angeles Dodgers skipper, Joe Torre, when recently asked what the difference is managing during the regular season versus the post-season playoffs replied, to paraphrase Joe, in the regular season, you think about making a change; you consider it, then you follow your gut instincts. In post-season, you don’t consider making changes – you make changes. The inference here is years of experience are superior to rationalization.

Conventional wisdom said that no other American was more qualified to be Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, if America found itself heading into another great depression, than Ben Bernanke. I submit that with interest rates nowhere to go but up; a weakening dollar, and massive budget deficits for years to come, the best person to run the Federal Reserve over the next two years is Paul Volcker.

At first blush, this idea may seem radical, but these are not ordinary times. What are the benefits if President Obama figuratively walks out to the pitcher’s mound, take the ball from Bernanke, and say, “Ben, you threw one hell of a game for eight innings. We can take it from here; the economy is heating up.” Then, Obama turn towards the bullpen forms his hand into the shape of a clam, opens, and closes it twice, to signal for his major league inflation closer – Paul Volcker.

This is presidential managing.

For starters, the world will know any future inflation in the US will be tame. When the cover of Barron’s is instructing the fed chief and the FOMC to raise rates at their next meeting, November 3-4 from 0.15% to 2.00%, perhaps he is hard-wired for fighting depression and we have gotten his A game – just when we needed it. But now, crisis accomadative monetery policy must give way to normal accomadative monetery policy.

The price of gold and our money supply is at all time highs. The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is now the second largest ETF behind the SPDR S&P 500 Index, holding $35 billion in assets. Only four central banks and the IMF control more gold, according to the World Gold Council. As the economy expands, do you really need a guy hanging around nicknamed “helicopter Ben”, named for vowing to spread money from helicopters to stop a depression from occurring, when too much liquidity is making too many people nervous?

This also sets a precedent. It was logical, I suppose, to move Tim Giethner from the Federal Reserve Bank of NY to Secretary of the Treasury to help thaw the frozen major center banks. The FDIC insurance fund is in the red, the (Unofficial) Problem Bank List at Calculated Risk show 479 names, therefore, most of the action over the next two years will occur in local and regional banks. Moving FDIC Chairman Sheila Baird to Secretary of the Treasury will maximize the power of the treasury to minimize the next leg of the banking crisis. On the other hand, maybe Volcker has a short list of candidates.

Cabinet members come and go all the time. Moreover, no one believes that it has to do with spending more time with the family. At least these are strategic reasons to point to if anxiety grows over persistent problems in the economy.

Weekly Review and Outlook: Deleveraging's Not Just for I-Banks

Like a wild jungle creature forced into a confrontation, but unsuccessful, this past week's stock market limped into the weekend, stunned, pensive, and little changed with Dow Jones Industrial Average [DJIA] closing at 11370.69, the Standard & Poor's 500 ending at 1256.76, and NASDAQ finishing its week at 2310.53. The Dow lost 125.88 for the week. Likewise, the S&P 500 dropped 2.92 and NASDAQ subtracted 27.75, respectively.

The CNBC midday rowdies strained themselves lifting a Hubble sized telescope looking for positive data points in the housing numbers. Existing home sales came out Thursday; they were down 2.4 percent in June, at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.86 million units. New home sales for June, appearing Friday, was lower by .06 percent, on a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 530,000, from a revised upward May figure of 533,000.

I can imagine the rowdies on an express elevator to hell remarking that our destination has dry heat, that it's a gated community, and that it's a Christian neighborhood with few trespassers.

In the second quarter, 739,714 foreclosure filings were recorded. Also, 220,000 homes were lost to bank repossession, according to RealtyTrac. That is up 14 percent from the first quarter and up 121 percent from the same quarter in 2007.

A report published on Friday, by an International Monetary Fund economist, concluded U.S. housing prices were still overvalued, in the first quarter this year, perhaps, 14 percent, within a range of 8 percent to 20 percent. According to Reuters, IMF economist Vladimir Klyuev's report "What goes up must come down? House price dynamics in the United States", examined the inventory-to-sales ratio, foreclosure rates, market inertia, and other data points, formulating this opinion. That would mean at least an additional $1 trillion in lost asset value. The government debt market is still comatose.

The 2 year and 10 year US Treasury Notes, as well as the 30 year US Treasury Bond ended the week with higher yields, paying 2.71%, 4.10%, and 4.68%, versus 2.64%, 4.85%, and 4.65, respectively. August is a major refunding month with auctions scheduled for the Two, Five, Ten, and Thirty Year Treasury obligations, in addition to the weekly T-Bill The brightest spot in the market was the Nymex Light Sweet Crude Oil September contract; it closed Friday at $123.26 per barrel, extending its reprieve to cash strapped motorists from its recent high of $147.20.

Online retail analysts are reporting double digit growth in sales among several retailers because of consumers passively boycotting higher gasoline prices. Who would have thought that one day we would be happy seeing oil prices heading towards $100 a barrel?

Late Friday afternoon, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency closed First National Bank and the FDIC was named receiver of another two banks, one California-based and the other Nevada based, First National Bank of Nevada with $3.4 billion in assets, and First Heritage with $254 million in assets. Both were owned by undercapitalized First National Bank Holding Co., of Scottsdale, Arizona. First National lost $140 million in the first quarter. They reported $4.6 billion in assets and $4.3 billion in liabilities. Nine point four percent of it $3.7 billion in loans were non-current, ending March 31. Mutual of Omaha Bank acquired the deposits of the two banks from the FDIC for a 4.41 percent premium. The new Mutual of Omaha Bank branches will open Monday morning.

There are currently 8,494 institutions holding $13.4 trillion assets insured by the FDIC. The FDIC said the failures would cost its deposit insurance fund roughly $862 million. This brings the total number of bank failures in 2008 to seven. You can learn more about the status of a particular bank here

Game Changer : The really, really, big news this week came from Chrysler LLC. It announced Friday afternoon that its financing arm would discontinue offering leasing deals to its U.S. customers beginning August 1; the same date when their $30 billion credit facility is up for renewal. The rising cost of capital is making leasing terms less attractive to consumers. This is another aftershock resulting from stifling energy prices and an economy that's deleveraging.

Declining SUV and lease values forced Ford to take a $2.1 billion charge at its finance division last week. Although, third party banks and credit unions will step in to fill the void, expect some slippage in the approval rates for leasing transactions. The same market pressures compelling Ford (F) to exit this market will certainly continue to present as a business factor for any entity looking to make a profit leasing vehicles. The cost of capital is important, however, the residual value of the underlying asset is monumental. The percentage of Chrysler sales attributed to leasing is greater than 20 percent.

It will be very interesting to see if this extemporaneous admission becomes evolutionary inside America's automobile industry. Americans divine right to drive automobiles has been an unconditional assumption since the end of WWII. In 2008, it's a fair question to ask given this extraordinary economic environment of failing banks, growing home foreclosures, stagnant incomes, evaporating jobs, personal and business credit contraction, a runaway federal budget, an aging infrastructure, an expensive endless foreign war, a fractured financial system, rising worldwide demand for limited resources, and a demonstrable shifting of global wealth. Plus, the third generation of Americans, exposed growing up around an enlightenment concerning the ecology and global environmental issues, is being handed the task of running our economy. They will shape and modify our society's habits in the future.

The U.S. Senate actually gaveled a rare Saturday session passing landmark legislation to triage a metastasizing bankrupted residential real estate market. Highlights of the bill include; a new regulator for Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE) and up to $300 billion to insure refinanced mortgages for the next 18 months; $4 billion to states to buy and rehabilitate foreclosed properties, a 10 percent tax credit up to $7,500 dollars for first time home buyers purchasing a home between April of this year and June of next year; increase the federal debt limit to $10.6 trillion, and more.

We now have a de facto nationalized residential real estate market. The reversal by the White House to withdraw a veto threat and sign a passed bill into law would create tears of joy on the face of Scottish economist John Law and Louis the XIV of France. Welcome to the new depression. France has succumbed to capitalism. In between fist bumping with the Democratic presumptive nominee Barack Obama and checking out his Italian-born former model turned pop star wife's, Carla Bruni-Sarkozy's new music album, "Comme si de rien n'etait"(As if nothing had happened), President Nicolas Sarkozy of France bullied his National Assembly into radically reforming their 1958 Constitution. Passage of the reform package includes limiting Presidential terms, strengthening the power of the legislature, weakening the position of Prime Minister, and repealing the 35 hour per week cap for workers.

It is an indication that the global downturn will affect everyone. The French are now more aware than ever of prioritizing work and leisure to enhance income and productivity. Calling national strikes on idealistic principles was an industrial age luxury. Cash flow is paramount in the beginning of the 21st century. Welcome to the club.

The year 2008 will record the resignation of Fidel Castro of Cuba, as its President, and the abandonment of immense leisure time by the average French worker; two aging symbols of 20th Century socialism. I wonder if Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke are erecting the first 21st century's symbol of socialism. Tonight, I shall pour a very, very, nice XO Cognac and contemplate the upcoming Consumer Confidence figure on the 29th; the Employment and Crude Inventories figures on the 30th; the GDP-Advanced, Initial Claims, and Chicago PMI, on the 31st; and August 1st, Auto and Truck Sales, Average Workweek, Hourly Earnings, Nonfarm Payrolls, Unemployment Rate, Construction Spending, and the ISM Index. Maybe two drinks, au revoir!