Morning in Arizona

Morning in Arizona
Rainbows over Canyonlands - Dave Stoker

The Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Royal Bank of Scotland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Royal Bank of Scotland. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Lie or Be Lehman

Financial Review

Lie or Be Lehman

Sinclair Noe

DOW + 121 = 18,162
SPX + 19 = 2123
NAS + 73 = 5106
10 YR YLD – .01 = 2.13%
OIL – .38 = 57.65
GOLD + .20 = 1189.00
SILV – .07 = 16.75

Yesterday the Dow posted a triple digit loss, today a triple digit gain; not enough to cover yesterday’s losses. The Nasdaq was higher on strength in semiconductor stocks; the Nasdaq posted a new record high close, taking out the high from April 24. The dollar was slightly stronger, oil was down again.

Severe storms and devastating floods over the weekend in Texas and Oklahoma have killed at least 19 people. Another 14 people are missing in Texas, including eight members of two families whose vacation home was swept away. The flooding has also resulted in complications for business travelers. About 11 inches of rain fell in Houston on Monday while parts of Austin have been hit by as much as 7 inches. Helicopter crews in both cities rescued people who had been stranded in cars and on top of buildings. The National Weather Service issued a new flash flood warning today.

The IRS says tax return information for about 100,000 U.S. taxpayers was illegally accessed by cyber criminals over the past four months. The stolen information included tax returns and other tax information on file with the IRS. The IRS said the thieves accessed a system called “Get Transcript.” In order to access the information, the thieves cleared a security screen that required knowledge about the taxpayer, including Social Security number, date of birth, tax filing status and street address. The IRS is notifying those affected. The IRS said the breach does not involve its main computer system that handles tax filing submission, and that system remains secure…, for now.

A red card for FIFA, the Federacion Internationale de Football Association, plus 14 arrests for illegal activities that make the governing body for soccer look more like a mafia crime family. The Department of Justice indictment names 14 people on charges including racketeering, wire fraud and money laundering conspiracy. In addition to senior soccer officials, the indictment also named sports-marketing executives from the United States and South America who are accused of paying more than $150 million in bribes and kickbacks in exchange for media deals associated with major soccer tournaments. Law enforcement officials say their investigation has just begun and there will be more action taken to clean up the sport.

As leaders of FIFA gathered in Zurich for their annual meeting, more than a dozen plainclothes Swiss law enforcement officials arrived unannounced at the Baur au Lac hotel, an elegant five-star property with views of the Alps and Lake Zurich. They went to the front desk to get room numbers and then proceeded upstairs. The concierge called the guest and informed them they should open their hotel door rather than having police break it down.

Swiss police arrested seven FIFA officials who are now awaiting extradition to the United States. Swiss prosecutors said they had opened their own criminal proceedings against unidentified people on suspicion of mismanagement and money laundering related to the awarding of rights to host the 2018 World Cup in Russia and the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. The president of FIFA, Sepp Blatter, was not arrested but he might be questioned in coming weeks.

Meanwhile, the US Department of Justice alleges a “24-year scheme” for FIFA officials “to enrich themselves through the corruption of international soccer.” Why is the US leading this investigation? Well, it involves some US sports marketing people and apparently many of the bribes were paid in US dollars and funneled through US banks. Beyond that, we just really don’t like soccer.

G-7 finance ministers and central bankers are meeting in Dresden, Germany. The host country set the agenda and it did not include discussion of Greece. They might not stick to plans. US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew spoke with Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras today for the second time in less than a week and told a London audience that “everyone has to double down” on reaching an accord. While the G-7 doesn’t have a mandate to decide how to deal with Greece, it brings together officials from the Eurozone’s three biggest economies, as well as the European Central Bank, The International Monetary Fund, and the European Union – the institutions backing the $262 billion aid package that expires next week.  The Greeks are reportedly drafting an accord.  Maybe they could borrow some money from FIFA.

Richmond Fed boss Jeffrey Lacker says policymakers must ensure that financial industry creditors do not expect government bailouts and must be willing to let firms fail in order to restore market discipline. Lacker also continued his assault on Dodd-Frank’s Title II and repeated his call to repeal the Fed’s emergency lending authority, arguing that less regulation, not more, is needed to make the system safer. British monarchy may appear to be nothing more than a vestigial ceremonial version of leadership, yet in that role, Queen Elizabeth delivered a speech today to mark the State Opening of Parliament and she promised an in-or-out popular vote on membership in the European Union. That has been a matter of debate and now the path towards a vote looks potentially shorter than anticipated, with some now talking of a referendum in 2016 rather than 2017.

Fed Chair Janet Yellen plans to skip the annual gathering of economists and policy makers in Jackson Hole this year, marking the second time in three years the Fed’s top official won’t be traveling to Wyoming. Yellen’s predecessor, Ben Bernanke, skipped the 2013 gathering. The topic of this year’s conference is inflation dynamics and monetary policy.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said he does not see signs of extreme movements in the US real estate and financial markets. Bernanke also said that if the Fed lifts interest rates, it would be good news because it means the U.S. economy is strong enough.

Royal Bank of Scotland, Britain’s largest taxpayer-owned lender, could pay as much as $4.5 billion to resolve claims of misconduct in its handling of US mortgage securities. The legal action relates to $32 billion in residential mortgage-backed securities sold to Fannie and Freddie from 2005 to 2007.

Back in 2005 Deutsche Bank was selling derivatives that were supposed to be a form of insurance against a huge financial disaster. And after they had sold billions of dollars of these derivatives, they started writing guarantees to the pool, or conduit, that was writing the guarantees. Deutsche was getting its derivative based version of insurance from Deutsche Bank’s own money; essentially selling derivatives on the derivatives it was selling to itself; while taking a commission off the top, of course. And by the way, these derivatives were super-senior, so they were highly rated – that’s an important point. When things went bad in 2008, they charged more for the derivative form of insurance because it was highly rated, but they also still treated it as if it was very highly rated, even though the world of finance was melting down. Deutsche figured that there was not a reliable method to measure the risk in light of the market conditions, and so they just figured there was zero risk.

Ultimately, the realities of 2008 showed that risk was quite a bit higher than zero. The SEC thought the whole thing was a bit fishy, but Deutsche maintained that it did not suffer any losses. Which was true because the insurance/derivatives never paid off. And the reason it never paid off was because it was highly leveraged, and it might have destroyed the bank, and they were clever enough to write into the derivative contract that they might not pay if they didn’t want to, so they did not pay. And in Deutsche’s twisted logic that meant the derivatives were very high quality; so good that they sold them to clients and even bought some themselves and then held it on their books as high credit quality capital.

In 2010, three whistle blowers stepped up to say that Deutsche had mismarked billions in exposures in 2008 and 2009 to make it look healthier than it really was. And this is important because banks are required to keep a certain amount of very safe capital available in the event of a problem; this is called tier one capital; and if a bank does not have enough tier one capital on hand, then they are basically considered insolvent. For example, in 2008, Lehman Brothers did not have enough tier one capital and they collapsed. As it turns out, Deutsche Bank did not have enough tier one capital on its books in 2008, but they did have highly leveraged derivatives, which were kind of, sort of like insurance created out of thin air, and backed by other derivatives, which were backed by their own capital, which was protected by nothing more than imagination and bogus credit ratings.

If Lehman Brothers had been smart enough to create derivatives out of thin air and call them insurance, they might never have collapsed. And If Deutsche Bank had not lied about the credit quality of their derivatives, they could have ended up like Lehman. But that didn’t happen, because Deutsche Bank lied. Yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission said that Deutsche Bank made material misstatements about a giant derivatives portfolio, inflating its value at the height of the financial crisis; and the bank failed to account for a “material risk for potential losses estimated to be in the billions of dollars”. The bank agreed to pay a $55 million penalty, without admitting or denying wrongdoing. Nobody goes to jail. The bank is not sanctioned. Deutsche said it had cooperated with regulators throughout the investigation and said the settlement “will have no impact on previous financial reports.” Hey it was a long time ago, in the ancient past. And the moral of this story is that when a bank gets in trouble, they should lie or be Lehman.

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Ongoing Criminal Enterprises

Financial Review

Ongoing Criminal Enterprises


DOW – 26 = 18,285
SPX – 1 = 2125
NAS + 1 = 5071
10 YR YLD – .01 = 2.25%
OIL + .77 = 58.76
GOLD + 1.80 = 1210.80
SILV un = 17.18

April 29 and 30 the Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee met to determine monetary policy; today, they published the minutes of that meeting. There were no surprises. Policymakers have no plans to increase interest rate targets in June. We all knew that. Officials in April “had increased uncertainty regarding the economic outlook,” the minutes showed. They had no good reason to explain why consumer spending was so weak.

“Most” Fed officials think the dramatic slowdown in growth in the first quarter was transitory and that a moderate rebound would resume in the second quarter. Inflation was also expected to move higher.  The international context isn’t helpful to the US economy. Fed officials deem “foreign economic and financial developments” as constituting “potential downside risks,” and they specifically mention Greece and China. Moreover, despite its recent partial retracement, the dollar’s appreciation is “likely to continue to be a factor restraining US net exports and economic growth for a time.”

This suggests that they see a rate hike coming sometime later this year. Only a “few” on the U.S. central bank questioned whether the Fed was providing enough stimulus for the economy at the present time and cautioned against any rate hike in the near future. This is an interesting point because the Fed really hasn’t provided much stimulus for the economy; they have provided stimulus to financial markets but not the broader economy in a direct fashion.

Indirectly, the Fed has provided stimulus to the broader economy through something known as the monetary transmission mechanism, which works largely through housing or other long-lived investments which are sensitive to interest rates. Interest rates don’t have strong impact on short-term investments or short-term capex. A lot of business investment is short-term; a lot of household spending is short-term. So Fed policy, by moving interest rates, normally exerts its effect mainly through housing. And interest rates do move housing. Remember the early 1980s when Paul Volker decided to tighten, interest rates jumped, and housing collapsed. And housing has come back from the lows, but not all the way back. One reason is because people who are most likely to buy houses got slammed in the downturn and couldn’t or wouldn’t jump back into that frying pan.

Today’s economic data backs up the relationship between housing and rates. Mortgage purchase applications fell 4.0 percent in the May 15 week though, year-on-year, applications are still up a very strong 11.0 percent. The ongoing run up in mortgage rates may be easing demand for mortgage applications just at the time that demand for purchase applications had been gaining steam.

And so the Fed is feeling like it has its back to the wall, and the wall is zero interest rates. If there is an economic problem the Fed can’t respond by lowering interest rates, or at least the impact of going into negative territory would be dangerous ground.

There was some debate about how to communicate any move to tighten rates. Some officials think it is important to give a warning to the markets, others worry that telegraphing intentions to hike rates will only result in a rate tantrum. The recent bond-market rout underscores that with bond yields near historical lows, even a moderate rise in yields would chip away the slim interest payments and inflict pain on bondholders. The Fed identifies this as episodes in which there were large monetary disturbances not caused by output fluctuations. Hopefully the Fed remembers the lesson from the Crash of 87; the markets respond violently to surprise rate hikes.

A mixed bag of economic releases this month has bolstered investors’ expectations that the Fed would wait until late this year to act. Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen will make a speech on Friday that might provide further guidance.

Five global banks have agreed to pay $5.8 billion in combined penalties and will plead guilty to criminal charges related to manipulating foreign currency exchange rates, also known as Forex. Four of the banks, JPMorgan Chase, Barclays, Royal Bank of Scotland, and Citigroup, will plead guilty to conspiring to manipulate the price of US dollars and euros.

Barclays will pay $650 million, Citigroup $925, million J.P. Morgan $550 million and RBS $395 million. Barclays will pay another $1.3 billion to New York State, federal and U.K. regulators.

The fifth bank, UBS, received immunity in the antitrust case because they informed regulators about the Forex rigging as part of an earlier deal related to Libor rigging; UBS had signed a Non-Prosecution Agreement in 2012 on the Libor charges, and their misconduct in the Forex markets violated that earlier agreement even though they self-reported wrongdoing. So, they have immunity on Forex but they had to plead guilty to Libor rigging.  UBS will pay $545 million in fines to the Justice Department and Federal Reserve.

The five banks will pay a further $1.6 billion in fines to the Federal Reserve. Bank of America also faces a $205 million fine by the Fed, but no criminal charges. No bank employees have been criminally charged. The five banks will be under a three-year period of probation.

Between December 2007 and January 2013, euro-dollar traders at Citigroup, JPMorgan, Barclays, RBS and UBS gathered in an exclusive electronic chat room and used coded language to coordinate their moves in the U.S. dollar-euro market. They referred to themselves as the Cartel. By agreeing not to buy or sell at certain times, they protected each other’s trading positions. The big banks were the market makers, setting daily exchange rates, known as the fix. The fix became the price paid for billions of dollars of currency bought or sold on any given day.

And the Cartel managed to skim a little for their efforts. One Barclays trader in the chat room about adding secret mark-ups to the prices wrote: “If you ain’t cheating, you ain’t trying.” Ben Lawsky, New York’s superintendent of Financial Services explained it simply:  “They engaged in a brazen ‘heads I win, tails you lose’ scheme to rip off their clients.” Also, a side note, after the big settlement announcement Lawsky announced he will step down next month as New York’s top bank regulator after four years. To his credit, he is not going to work for JPMorgan.

I have not yet seen a figure for how much prosecutors think the Cartel stole, but the Forex market trades close to $5 trillion dollars a day, so today’s fines amount to about one/one-thousandth of daily volume. The rigging took place over more than 5 years. I’m guessing that the money they stole in rigging Forex might amount to more than the fines ordered today. And that raises another interesting question – how did they report that income? Will they now go back and amend their earnings reports?

Didn’t managers and Board of Directors sign off under Sarbanes-Oxley?

And remember that the Forex scandal follows on the heels of the Libor rigging scandal, and the ISDAfix scandal (that involved the $381 trillion market for interest-rate swaps and the $44 trillion market for options on swaps. Banks use it to set coupons paid for bonds tied to commercial real estate. And there is a mountain of evidence, and today Barclays agreed to a $115 million dollar settlement on the ISDAfix investigation. Other banks are also being investigated.)

And before that, the municipal bond rigging scandals, and scandals in commodity markets including precious metals, and tax evasion scandals, and money laundering scandals, and predatory lending scandals, and much, much, much more. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results, but based on past performance you have to figure that the banks have rigged all the financial markets.

FT has a running total of legal fines and settlements paid by banks to US regulators since 2007. According to their calculations, the tote board just touched $155 billion. In case you were wondering, over eight years that works out to $53m per day (including weekends, because client service is a 24 hour kind of business, right.)

The big news in today’s settlement was not the size of the fines, not the scale of the scandal, but that the banks actually admitted criminal guilt. UBS violated its 2012 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and we’re still just looking at a fine for a repeat offender. The banks will get to keep their charters; they can continue to conduct business; three years’ probation. They can still vote, or at least buy elections. The deal does not prevent the Department of Justice from going after individual criminal charges but for now, nobody goes to jail.

HSBC has become one of the biggest global banks to say it will begin charging clients on deposits in a basket of European currencies to prevent its profit margins from being crushed in a record low-interest rate environment. The unusual steps come after the ECB last year became the first big central bank to announce a negative deposit rate, in effect a penalty on banks parking their surplus cash.

The Japanese economy staged a comeback in first quarter, expanding at an annualized 2.4% vs. the previous quarter. Despite the positive figure, economists are still worried about Japanese growth and deflation as most of the expansion was due to a huge build-up of inventories. The Nikkei Stock Index finished the session at a 15-year high.

It is widely recognized that Greece is running out of money. The next questions are when they will run out money and what will happen when they run out of money. Nikos Filis, from the ruling Syriza party, told Greek television Greece will not be able to make a €1.5 billion repayment to the IMF that falls due on June 5 if there is no deal with its international creditors by then.