Morning in Arizona

Morning in Arizona
Rainbows over Canyonlands - Dave Stoker

The Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Nobel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nobel. Show all posts

Monday, October 10, 2016

3Q Earnings and Political Uncertainty

Financial Review

3Q Earnings and Political Uncertainty


DOW + 88 = 18,329
SPX + 9 = 2163
NAS + 36 = 5328
OIL + 1.39 = 51.20
GOLD

Today is Columbus Day. Even though stock markets were open today, bond markets were closed, the majority of banks and credit unions were closed, and most federal and local government offices are closed for the holiday. (In case you were wondering why the mail wasn’t delivered.)

Oil prices rose to their highest in a year after Russia said it was ready to join a proposed deal to cap oil production. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), of which Russia is not a member, aims to agree an output cut by the time it meets in late November. Russian President Vladimir Putin said an output freeze or even a production cut were likely the only right decisions to maintain energy sector stability.

Analysts at ABN Amro took a more cautious view on an OPEC deal, saying previous hints by the group on output cuts have always failed to be followed up by action. Iraq, OPEC’s second biggest producer, had already poured cold water on expectations, saying over the weekend that it wants to raise output further in 2017.

Further complicating OPEC output caps is that inventory levels in the US have reached record highs since the oil-price collapse in 2014. This surplus supply is a major factor keeping oil prices low. Current inventories are 45 million barrels higher than 2015 levels, which were more than 100 million barrels higher than the average from 2010 through 2014. Until the present surplus is reduced by almost 150 million barrels down to the 2010-2014 average, there is little technical possibility of a sustained oil-price recovery.

The Federal Reserve’s September meeting was contentious. The Fed extended its stimulus campaign, but three officials voted to raise rates, the largest bloc of dissenting votes in several years. On Wednesday, the central bank will release an account of the meeting that may reveal more about the lines of conflict. Fed chair Janet Yellen said at a news conference after the meeting that the majority of officials saw no reason to rush ahead with a rate increase. The dissenters say the Fed is playing a dangerous game by dragging its feet. On Friday, Yellen will have another chance to explain her own views when she addresses a conference in Boston.

The publication of Alcoa Q3 results tomorrow after the closing bell, will mark the beginning of Q3 earning season for major US companies. According to FactSet consensus estimates, profits are likely to decline by 2.1% y/y, the sixth consecutive quarterly decline. Earnings should drop despite the expected 2.6% increase of sales. On June 30, analysts estimated a 0.3% increase of profits in Q3.

The decline in corporate profits should be mainly driven by the energy sector, whose earnings are expected to tumble by 67% y/y. Industrial and real estate should also record falling earnings, at -7.8% and -6.3% respectively. On the opposite side, utilities should post the highest earning growth rate (+5.3%), followed by consumer discretionary at +5%. According to FactSet consensus, corporate profits should return to a positive growth rate in Q4, with a 5.6% y/y increase.

During earnings reporting season, companies publish what passes for the results of the prior quarter and they also have the chance to explain their successes or failures. We tend to hear plenty of excuses such as a “strong dollar” or “Brexit” or the old standby “bad weather”.

The excuse for poor third quarter results is likely to be uncertainty related to the presidential election.  People aren’t buying enough potato chips – political uncertainty. Companies aren’t buying new computers – political uncertainty. Consumers aren’t buying new cars – political uncertainty. Recent measures of consumer confidence have exceeded or neared post-financial-crisis highs, and consumer spending remains one of the bright spots of the US economy. So, when you hear the excuse of “political uncertainty” you can be fairly certain that is not the answer.

The British pound resumed its decline as investors waited for clues about the cause of last week’s flash crash and on whether Britain is truly headed for a hard Brexit. U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May will meet with foreign leaders this week in a bid to build understanding for her negotiating position ahead of this month’s EU summit. Meanwhile, officials are still trying to figure out what triggered last week’s flash crash in the pound. Sterling remains the world’s worst-performing major currency this year.

British-born Oliver Hart and Finland’s Bengt Holmstrom won the Nobel Economics Prize today for work that addresses a host of questions from how best to reward executives to whether schools and prisons should be privately owned. Their findings on contract theory have implications in such areas as corporate governance, bankruptcy legislation and political constitutions. Hart is an economics professor at Harvard University while Holmstrom is a professor of economics and management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Hart’s research work has included a damning assessment of America’s private prisons. He showed that the pressure to cut costs was too great, leading to an unacceptable drop in quality. At the core is the issue of “incomplete contracts” – the fact that contracts are not detailed enough to cover every small point.

Holmström is known for pioneering research into executive pay. His work on employment contracts has considered a range of professions from teaching to management and whether they should be paid fixed salaries or work on the basis of performance-related pay.

A group of nuns and other religiously-affiliated investors have lost faith in Wells Fargo and filed a shareholder resolution calling on the bank to report on the root causes of a fake accounts scandal that led to a $190 million settlement struck with regulators last month. The faith-based investors say they also want the report to cover improved controls after revelations bank employees opened as many as 2 million checking, savings and credit card accounts without the customers’ permission in order to meet sales quotas. The resolution is one among a series filed recently at Wells Fargo. Other resolutions call on Wells Fargo to study a breakup and to split the roles of chairman and chief executive officer.

Deutsche Bank CEO John Cryan was in Washington over the weekend for the International Monetary Fund and World Bank’s autumn meetings. Reportedly while there he met with Justice Department officials but was not able to negotiate down the $14 billion fine they have demanded. Deutsche Bank is expected to issue new shares, sell assets, or both, once it knows the scale of the fine, to ensure that its capital ratio remains within regulatory limits.

Mylan has agreed to pay the U.S. government $465 million in a swift settlement over how it charged Medicaid for its allergy shot EpiPen. The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, said in a letter this week that Mylan had misclassified EpiPen as a generic drug, while the government has said it was a brand-name product and that Mylan should have given states and the U.S. bigger rebates. The agreement with the Justice Department and other agencies resolves all potential rebate liability claims by federal and state governments. There was no admission of wrongdoing by Mylan or its employees.

Negotiators from Unifor and Fiat Chrysler will not be with their families today celebrating Canadian Thanksgiving. The union has set a strike deadline of midnight for its 9,750 members employed by the automaker, and is looking for a contract similar to the one it signed last month with General Motors Canada. Among other things, that deal traded pension benefits for shortening the time it takes newly hired employees to reach full wage rates.

Chicago’s public schools and its teachers’ union make the final push to avert a looming strike on Tuesday. Pensions are among a key sticking point. The district would like to phase out the 7 percent of annual salary that it contributes each year to teachers’ pensions. Unions want to keep the pension contributions and ink a new, three-year contract that would give teachers 2 percent raises in the second and third years. The state, the city and the school district have all had their credit ratings cut to junk, or just above it. The impasse and the threat of the strike would affect nearly 400,000 students.

Samsung has reportedly stopped production of its Note 7. The temporary production halt comes after five reports of fires in replacement phones, suggesting replacement Galaxy Note 7 devices remained plagued by the same faulty battery problem that occurred in the original device. Samsung’s decision came after major mobile carriers in the U.S., including AT&T and T-Mobile, said they would stop issuing Note 7s over safety concerns.

After five years of litigation, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on Tuesday in the patent dispute between the world’s two top smartphone manufacturers over the amount Samsung should pay Apple for copying the iPhone’s distinctive look. The justices’ ruling, due by the end of June, could have a long-term impact for designers and product manufacturers going forward because the Supreme Court, if it agrees with Samsung, could limit the penalties for swiping a patented design.

A jury found that Samsung had violated an Apple design patent by mimicking the iPhone’s round corners and grid of icons. The question for the justices is whether that means Samsung must turn over all its profits from the infringing phones or just those attributable to the disputed features. The court has not heard a design patent case in over a century.

Monday, October 13, 2014

Forget Complacency

FINANCIAL REVIEW

Forget Complacency

Financial Review

DOW – 223 = 16,321
SPX – 31 = 1874
NAS – 62 = 4213
10 YR YLD closed 2.28%
OIL – .69 = 85.05
GOLD + 14.10 = 1238.10
SILV + .10 = 17.60
The major indices were up and then down; small moves earlier in the session; then, in the final hour stocks slipped and kept falling. The S&P 500 has fallen 6.8 percent from its Sept. 18 record, making this the worst pullback in two-and-a-half years. The Russell 2000 sank 4.7 percent last week. The small-cap index entered a correction after sliding more than 10 percent from an all-time high in March. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has dropped 5.5 percent from its record last month, while the Nasdaq Composite Index has slumped 8.3 percent from a 14-year high reached in September. The Volatility Index, or VIX, rose 13 percent today to 24, the highest level since June 2012. Forget complacency.
The final hour collapse coincided with a report that an Emirates Airline plane in Boston was surrounded by medical crews and they removed five passengers over concerns about Ebola. But there is more to today’s trading than an Ebola scare.
Oil prices continued to slide. Saudi Arabia is saying they are comfortable with oil prices in the sub-$90 range. The Saudis don’t necessarily want prices to slide further, but they are unwilling to shoulder production cuts unilaterally and they are prepared to tolerate lower prices until others in OPEC commit to action, and that probably won’t happen until oil hits $80.
Commodities have taken a beating recently, and it’s not just oil. Coal stocks were trashed last week when China announced that it would reinstate tariffs on certain types of imported coal that were scrapped a decade ago. The tariffs threaten to slash coal imports and boost China’s domestic coal industry.
And if you don’t like fundamental explanations and if you don’t buy exogenous events, you can just look at the charts; the technicals are breaking down. If you look at the Dow Industrials, you will probably see a rising wedge pattern. Let me explain; if you print out a chart for 2014, and draw a straight line across the tops (that’s your upper resistance line) and another straight line across the lows (that’s your lower support line), you will have a wedge that start out wide in January and narrows; until the past couple of days, where the Dow dropped below that lower support line. A rising wedge formation is pretty bearish. The next levels of support come in at 16,025 and then at 15,370. Last week, the Dow dropped below the 200 day moving average and we did not get a bounce today; that would be considered bearish.
The S&P 500 broke down below the 200 day moving average, which is your primary trend line. While it is possible to see a bounce, I don’t know that you want to hold your breath. You might think the S&P is oversold and a bounce is in order, but that doesn’t guarantee anything. The only positive is that today was a fairly light volume day, because of the Columbus Day holiday, which isn’t much of a holiday. The next levels of support for the S&P are around 1815 and then at 1740.
Sell-offs are always brutal and this past week is no exception. There are many things to cause concern but it seems the biggest red flag is the warning of a global depression, complete with deflation in the Eurozone. Over the weekend, Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer and Chicago Fed President Charles Evans said, in essence that the Fed was in no hurry to raise rates and might be very patient and might wait a bit because of concerns about slow global growth. The International Monetary Fund cut its forecast for global growth last week and said the euro area faces the risk of a triple dip recession.
The catalyst last week looks to be the weak economic numbers coming out of Germany. One reason Germany had such bad export figures is because of the sanctions imposed on Russia, a major trade partner. And so now Germany will have to make a move, and the longer Germany waits to take fiscal action, the more the entire Eurozone will slip into Japanese style deflation, and that won’t just be the peripheral countries, but it will affect Germany as well. The thinking is that Germany would stick with the failed idea of austerity until the German economy contracts; that is now happening; plus we might hear tomorrow that Germany will cut its forecast for this year and next year, and it might be a sharp cut from the already weak 1.8% growth projections; plus, Germany in a weakened economic position actually serves the ECB’s interests. And today we are getting a test of German resolve for austerity.
It comes from France. Eurozone finance ministers are trying to avoid a clash with France, which must formally submit its budget for scrutiny by the European Union authorities. The French government has recently announced a “no austerity” budget for 2015, even if that means missing the EU mandated deficit target by a wide margin. Over the next couple of weeks France will likely make its case that a weak economy, including the threat of deflation is creating exceptional challenges.
We are seeing that monetary policy is getting worn out. The publication of the FOMC minutes last week managed to pump up the equity markets for one day, then the bloodletting continued. The ECB also tried to goose markets, and failed miserably. And so the markets have swooned, and investors have turned their back on the “buy the dip” mantra of the past couple of years. For the past few years, QE and ZIRP managed to pump up stocks and junk bond funds and asset backed securities and housing and whatever the Fed was selling, but at a certain point they seem to have run out of buyers.
It’s time now for today’s edition of “Banks Behaving Badly”. Today’s bankster is the Royal Bank of Canada, and specifically the investment banking arm, RBC Capital Markets. Today’s story is a familiar story of conflict of interest and playing clients against each other. While advising the ambulance operator Rural/Metro on its $440 million sale in 2011, RBC was also pitching to finance the buyer, the private equity firm Warburg Pincus. The lure of loan and advisory fees and the potential for promoting the transaction to win similar clients led the bank to advocate a lowball offer. A judge in Delaware has ruled that Rural/Metro shareholders deserve an extra $76 million. The theory behind the fine is that the adviser aided and abetted the board’s breach of a duty to shareholders.
This is not the first example of conflict of interest and breach of fiduciary duty. Barclays Bank had a conflict advising Del Monte on a sale while also financing the buyers. In 2011, the bank and Del Monte paid some $90 million to settle. And in 2012, Goldman returned its $20 million fee for helping pipeline operator El Paso sell itself to Kinder Morgan. Turns out Goldman owned a $4 billion stake in the buyer. In the case of RBC, a $76 million dollar fine is small potatoes, but it is a stain on reputation and a warning to companies in the future to demand transparency.
Meanwhile, the data breach at JPMorgan finally caused Jamie Dimon to wake up from his London Whale induced slumber (he was napping at the time) and he now realizes the bank needs help. JPMorgan will spend $250 million a year to increase security and prevent future breaches. He also pointed out that JPMorgan was not the only bank to have this problem.
There were no domestic economic reports today due to Columbus Day. This week’s economic calendar includes a report on Retail Sales on Wednesday, also the Fed will publish its Beige Book; Friday brings a report on housing starts and consumer sentiment. Also, earnings season kicks into gear.
Jean Tirole, a French economist, has won the 2014 Nobel in economic science for his work on the best way to regulate large, powerful firms in industries including banking and communications. Tirole has called for increased regulation of the banking industry. In an interview broadcast after the announcement, he applauded new liquidity regulations and said that governments needed to pay particular attention to the connections between regulated banks and unregulated parts of the financial system.
In an interview with Bloomberg Television, Tirole said that banks receiving government support should face tougher rules; calling for strong rules “to prevent banks from gambling with taxpayers’ money,” adding that “if they are to be bailed out, they have to be regulated”.
Tirole has done work on many, many areas of the market, yet one of the concerns is the idea of monopolistic power. The government worries mainly about “horizontal” mergers in which one company buys another that does the same thing. But there’s also risk in vertical combinations. A monopolist in one part of the production chain; such as a computer operating system, might be able to extend its market power to neighboring links on the chain.
The Chicago School of antitrust economics, personified by the likes of failed Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork, argued in the 1970s and 1980s that attempts to extend a monopoly “vertically” would be irrational because a company could get all the benefits of its market power without merging with one of its customers or suppliers. The Chicago School’s theory was so influential that it caused the Justice Department to remove “vertical integration” from the things to watch out for in its official merger guidelines. Tirole was among a group of economists who showed, using game theory, that it was in fact possible to make a bigger profit by extending a monopoly to higher and lower links on the production chain. And the result is we now have banks that are too big to fail and communication companies that have snuffed out competition, resulting in higher prices and worse service.

Tuesday, October 07, 2014

Thanks Hank

FINANCIAL REVIEW

Thanks Hank

Financial Review
DOW – 272 = 16,719
SPX – 29 = 1935
NAS – 69 = 4385
10 YR YLD – .07 = 2.35%
OIL – 1.91 = 88.43
GOLD + 1.50 = 1209.30
SILV – .16 = 17.29
The S&P 500 dropped below its 50-day moving average last week and has yet to move back above that level. Coincidentally, the S&P 500 has been sliding for a few weeks, going back to September 19, which was the day of the Alibaba IPO, just coincidentally. The Dow is also trading below its 50 day moving average. Welcome to the start of earnings season.
In the past 3 months the US dollar has jumped by 8% against the euro. That makes American goods more expensive relative to European goods. And it wasn’t just the dollar against the Euro, but against a basket of foreign currencies. It is estimated that a 5% rise in the dollar versus the euro results in a drop of about $1 for full-year Standard & Poor’s 500 Index per-share earnings; current estimates for the S&P are running around $118. Partly because of the dollar and the related decline in oil prices, earnings estimates have seen one of the largest downward revisions over the last few years aside from the weather-beaten first quarter of this year.
Earnings-per-share are projected to have grown 4.9% in the third quarter, that’s down from 7.8% earnings growth 3 months ago. At the end of March, third quarter earnings were forecast to grow 9%. The strong dollar may have an even greater impact on guidance for the fourth quarter. Alcoa marks the unofficial start of the earnings season with their report after markets close tomorrow.
US job openings hit a 13-year high in August. According to a report published by the US Labor Department, there were 4.84 million open jobs to fill in the US in August, up from 4.61 million the previous month. The good news is economists were only expecting 4.7 million job openings. The bad news: Hiring in August dropped to 4.6 million from 4.9 million in July.
Americans boosted their use of credit in August by the slowest rate in nine months. Consumers increased borrowing by a seasonally adjusted $13.5 billion in August, or by a 5% annual rate. The gain was the smallest since last November and marks a big deceleration from the 8.1% increase in July. Consumers took out more loans to buy cars or pay for college, with non-revolving credit rising by 7%. Yet Americans actually cut credit-card use a touch, as revolving credit dropped 0.2%. Consumer credit increased by an annual pace of 6.2% in 2012 and 6% in 2013 and it’s on track to grow even faster in 2014 despite the slowdown in August.
A gauge that tracks delinquencies in eight major types of closed-end loans, such as credit to buy cars or pay for property improvements, dropped in the second quarter to 1.57%, the lowest rate in the data’s four-decade history; the data does not include home purchase mortgages.
The International Monetary Fund trimmed its forecast for global economic growth to 3.3%, down from the earlier forecast of 3.4%, forecast in July. The IMF predicts the US economy will grow at a 2.2% pace, which is up from the July forecast. The 17-nation euro zone is expected to expand by just 0.8% this year. If you are thinking you’ve heard this story before, and I’m just repeating myself, well, not exactly; the IMF has developed a nasty habit of missing economic forecasts, and when the misses are exposed, they are forced to revise.
Three scientists win a Nobel for making the world a little brighter. Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano, and Shuji Nakamura won the Nobel Prize for physics for their discovery of how to produce blue light from semi-conductors, which allowed for the creation of white-light LEDs. So, the Nobel goes to the inventors of a new light bulb, but that is a major deal.
Nearly a fourth of global electricity consumption is used to brighten dark spaces. Traditional incandescent and fluorescent lights are notoriously inefficient with much of the energy used to produce light lost in the form of heat. Meanwhile, LED lamps last longer and use a fraction of the energy to produce the same, if not more, light. That has huge consequences for the developed world, and cities, offices, and homes are already swapping out old bulbs for the brighter, more efficient LEDs. But the technology has perhaps even greater significance for the more than 1.5 billion who lack access to electricity grid. In Sub-Saharan Africa, that’s two out of three people. By requiring less power, LEDs perform better than traditional lights on portable, scale solar energy, which makes spreading electricity to rural, off-grid regions much easier.
Federal officials asked a group of large banks and other financial institutions last month to check if they had seen indicators associated with the cyberattack that resulted in the theft of account information for millions of JPMorgan customers this summer. A number of financial institutions responded that they had seen traffic from the suspect computer addresses linked to the hackers, but that they didn’t believe they had been breached. Rather, the hackers, whose identity remains unknown, appeared to be “probing,” or searching for weaknesses on the firms’ digital perimeters. So, who has the weakest cyber security? Either the other financial institutions have been hacked and they just don’t realize it yet, or JPMorgan was a pathetically weak link.
The New York Times reports that the Department of Justice is preparing to charge several of the world’s biggest banks with colluding to alter the price of foreign currencies; essentially rigging the Forex market. Deutsche Bank, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Barclays and UBS are among the dozen or so banks under investigation. Prosecutors are reportedly planning to indict individual bank employees for currency manipulation. They will not be going after the bank executives, but rather the traders. That is a familiar story. Everyone knows that the CEOs of big banks know absolutely nothing about what’s actually going on in their banks. The execs offer up a sacrificial lamb and go on with their unsavory practices, but this time might be different.
The idea is that prosecutors would use the currency rigging to reopen earlier settlements in the Libor interest rate rigging cases. Those rate rigging cases have already led to settlements with 5 banks, and part of the deal there was not to do bad things like rig markets. Meanwhile, some banks also remain under investigation. In the last major rate-rigging case against a bank, prosecutors are discussing the possibility of forcing Deutsche Bank or one of its subsidiaries to plead guilty to manipulating Libor. And the Libor case could quite easily result in criminal charges, if the DOJ has the spine for it. That remains to be seen. So far the Department of Justice has been afraid of the impact of a wounded bank on the world economy, and so they have done little more than levy “slap-on-the-wrist” fines, essentially taking a cut of the ill-gotten gains; like allowing a Cocaine Cartel to pay its criminal fines in crack.
The AIG bailout trial started last week. The trial is largely the result of former AIG CEO Maurice “Hank” Greenberg arguing that AIG wasn’t treated as well as the banksters when it came time to pass out taxpayer bailouts. The banksters got sweetheart deals, and for AIG, the government demanded 80% of the company stock, and used it as collateral against the loan, and charged 12% on the loan, and later, started sweeping all the dividends. Greenberg and his companies, notably Starr International, were the biggest AIG investors at the time, and the government’s bailout effectively crushed their shares.
Of course, AIG had been playing fast and loose with derivatives of subprime mortgages, and they had been forced to restate earnings, and their entire operation was a big, greedy hot mess that likely would have collapsed without a taxpayer bailout. AIG had become the industry leader in credit default swaps, essentially insuring the big banksters on large swaths of toxic mortgage deals. If AIG did not unravel all that credit default insurance, the entire banking structure likely would have collapsed.
Yesterday, former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson admitted that certain firms were treated differently than others; AIG was treated tougher than Citigroup; Paulson said that circumstances warranted it because those banks were more essential to keeping the financial system afloat. He said that the government had to treat AIG harshly to win political support. Of course, the government didn’t treat AIG that harshly, gifting them a carryover tax benefit worth $35 billion and letting their executives take bonuses in 2009. Hank Greenberg argues that AIG could have survived; that other potential suitors were ready to step in with offers, but the government made them an offer they couldn’t refuse, and then the government changed the terms of the offer. There has been no testimony that a gun was held to anyone’s head. AIG took the deal at the time.
Today, Tim Geithner took the stand; Geithner was the president of the New York Fed in 2008, before he succeeded Paulson as Treasury Secretary. Geithner admitted that he had described an AIG bankruptcy as an unacceptable option and that the company represented a “systemic risk” in September 2008 that required government intervention. And that seems to be Greenberg’s argument; that the bailout of AIG was punitive and confiscatory. And it looks like it probably was. That’s what it should have been. AIG was forced to pay the credit default swap insurance, the banks survived; the taxpayers were paid back for their bailout of AIG, and now Hank Greenberg and Starr International want an extra $40 billion.
Of course, AIG might have gone completely bust, they could have dragged down the banksters with them, and the entire financial system could have melted down, and Hank Greenberg could be scrounging for a meal in the dumpster. Instead, he was left with a few billion, just enough to hire some high priced lawyers to spit in the face of taxpayers who saved his bacon. Thanks Hank.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/big-banks-face-another-round-of-u-s-charges/