FINANCIAL REVIEW

Lather, Rinse, Repeat

Sinclair Noe — November 4, 2014

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 13:15 — 6.1MB)

Financial Review

DOW + 17 = 17,383
SPX – 5 = 2012
NAS – 15 = 4623
10 YR YLD – .01 = 2.34%
OIL – 1.31 = 77.47
GOLD + 2.90 = 1169.20
SILV – .11 = 16.13

Election Day 2014! We should all be very, very happy. Forget about red and blue, we can all count our blessings because the campaign ads on radio and TV are going away. There is one redeeming thing about this whole election. It will be over in a few hours. Say hallelujah!

Or you could say that it’s amazing that anyone bothers to vote given that our choices are between tweedle dumb and tweedle dumber. Still, I went to the polls today, early, and I cast my ballot. I was the only voter voting. In a few hours we’ll get the results. And the most likely result is that not much will change, despite the drama and despite hundreds of millions to persuade you. It takes a fortune for a politician to get beat these days, but most of the money isn’t real, it’s magic money that doesn’t belong to anybody, or at least nobody is willing to admit they spend money on politics. We’ve got the best politicians money can buy.

The present split Congress is the least-productive in US history. Regardless of the election’s outcome, the 114th Congress is unlikely to be any more productive than the 113th. Maybe that’s good news; when they do something is when they become dangerous. There are plenty of issues worthy of intelligent discussion and debate, however that never seemed important in this midterm election. That we have been burden with such an abundance of bull and still survived just shows we are a super nation.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

Let’s look at the economic news.

Home prices were down slightly in September, according to Corelogic prices were down 0.1% for the month and that resulted in year to year growth of 5.6%, the slowest pace in 2 years. So, the rate of growth in home prices has clearly slowed. For Arizona, home prices are still down 30% from the peak.

New orders for US factory goods fell for the second straight month, down 0.6% in September. August’s orders were slightly revised to show a 10.0 percent fall instead of the previously reported 10.1 percent decline. The decline in orders was led by aircraft, machinery, capital goods and computers and electronic products.

Yesterday we reported that auto sales were up in the third quarter, but the car companies are calling them back faster than they can sell them. Toyota is recalling 5,850 vehicles because of a possible loss of steering control. Ford is looking at 5 recalls totaling 202,000 vehicles for a variety of issues, including an incorrect repair of a steering problem in a previous recall.

Oil futures dipped under $76 a barrel for a while today. If there was any doubt on which country Saudi Arabia was targeting with their price shattering oil production, there is not any doubt now. While Russia, Iran and Venezuela might turn out to be collateral damage in the Saudi oil production surge, the message that Saudi Arabia is trying to send is directed to the US shale producers. The Kingdom made no secret of their displeasure yesterday when they cut oil prices to US buyers while raising them for everyone else in the world. Saudi Aramco next month will sell its Arab Light to clients in Asia for 10 cents less than Middle East benchmarks, the November discount was $1.05 yet it lowered prices for all grades to the US.

The plan is to maintain market share in the US and bury the US energy producers. The Saudis fear predictions that US oil imports could fall to zero by 2037 as a reason they need to nip US oil producers in the bud. They are threatened by US oil production and they are acting to try to break the US producers back. That is one of the reasons todays balance of trade numbers weren’t much higher, even in the face of a strong dollar. The US not only has reduced oil imports but has become a major exporter of oil products.

The nation’s trade deficit increased 7.6% in September to the highest level since the late spring as exports to Europe, China and Japan all fell. In turn, this will likely lead to a lower revision of third quarter GDP; probably a drop from the 3.5% initial estimate, down to about 3%. In September, the trade gap climbed to a seasonally adjusted $43 billion from a slightly revised $40 billion in August. Yet if petroleum is excluded, the nation’s trade gap climbed to $47.2 billion in September to mark the highest level in seven years. Here’s the downside of a strong dollar: US exports of goods fell 3.2% with China, 6.5% with the European Union and 14.7% with Japan.

It’s not just a strong dollar but a combination of weak global economies. Today the European Commission said the Eurozone will need another year to reach even a modest level of economic growth. The new forecast calls for 0.8% growth across the Eurozone economy this year, and just 1.1% growth next year.

The Independent Evaluation Office of the International Monetary Fund issued a report that basically says the IMF did a poor job responding to the financial crisis; the IMF ignored its own research and pushed too early for richer countries to trim budgets. They admit the IMF was overly concerned about high debt levels and large fiscal deficits, and urged countries like Germany, the United States and Japan to pursue austerity in 2010-11 before their economies had fully recovered from the crisis. At the same time, the IMF advocated loose monetary policies to sustain growth and boost demand in advanced economies, initially ignoring the possible spillover risks of such policies for emerging market countries. In 2012, the IMF finally admitted that it had underestimated how much budget cuts could hurt growth and recommended a slower pace for austerity policies. But its auditor said the IMF’s own research showed this relationship even before the crisis.

The European Central Bank meets Thursday to try and figure out their next course of action.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

While every major economy in the world has followed essentially the same monetary policy since 2008, their fiscal policies have been very different and the divergence in outcomes, especially when we compare the United States and Europe, has been exactly the opposite to what was implied by the rhetoric of most politicians and central banks.

Countries that took emergency measures to reduce public borrowing have mostly suffered weaker growth, as in the case of Britain from 2010 to 2012, Japan this year and the United States after the 2013 “sequester” and fiscal cliff deal. In more extreme cases, such as Italy and Spain, fiscal tightening has plunged them back into deep recession and aggravated financial crises. Meanwhile countries that ignored their deficit problems, as in the United States for most of the post-crisis period, or where governments decided to downplay their fiscal tightening plans, as in Britain this year or Japan in 2013, have generally done better, both in terms of economics and finance.

When faced with private sector deleveraging, there are limits to the persuasive powers of low interest rates to revive private economic activity; low rates may help in an inflationary environment, but in a deflationary environment, spending is needed to stimulate demand. With interest rates at or near zero, private demand cannot be simulated with further rate cuts and this means that monetary easing can no longer offset fiscal tightening. As a result, any reduction in budget deficits becomes more and more deflationary. The flip side is that fiscal expansion could truly provide economic stimulus without the worry of interest rate increases. That doesn’t mean that we will see fiscal expansion to correct the problem, just because there is indisputable mathematics to support it.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

JPMorgan Chase has added $2.4 billion to its estimate of the amount of legal costs it may face. That figure was disclosed yesterday in a securities filing in which the bank also formally acknowledged that it was facing a criminal investigation by the Justice Department into the behavior of traders in the foreign exchange market. In the past few days, Citigroup, Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC, and Barclays all announced new reserves totaling more than $2.3 billion to deal with investigations into foreign exchange rate manipulation. Deutsche Bank added more than $1 billion to legal reserves for the expected cost of settlements. The cases involve collusion in the $5.3 trillion daily foreign exchange market to affect rates.

If it sounds familiar, well that is because we have seen settlements like this before. In 2012 Barclays and UBS entered deals to pay fines totaling almost $2 billion; a UBS subsidiary pleaded guilty to rigging Libor. The prosecutors and regulators probably thought the agreements would deter further bad behavior. The deals involved non-prosecution or deferred prosecution agreements. The agreements allow the Justice Department to reinstate charges if there is any future violation of the law. Most important, admissions by the bank as part of the settlement can be used against it as evidence later, essentially stripping the bank of any possible defenses if the case were to proceed further. There is little chance, then, that a bank could fight the charges, so it would have to agree to a new settlement with more onerous terms and a new penalty.

But it turns out that simply slapping the banks with more and bigger fines, does not deter future bad behavior. The government is not required to minimize the collateral consequences of a conviction, and individuals are usually required to fend for themselves if they are convicted of a crime. But the foreign exchange inquiry involves a number of leading global banks, each with thousands of employees worldwide. So federal prosecutors go for punishment that does not threaten the continued existence of one of the banks. In other words, punishment that doesn’t actually punish.

The government has imposed billions of dollars in fines over the past few years for corporate violations, part of an effort to show that no company is “too big to jail”, while steadfastly refusing to actually jail a bank or major bank executives for criminal violations.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

Thursday, May 01, 2014 - If the Cops Never Arrest the Killer, Nobody Really Died

Financial Review with Sinclair Noe

DOW – 21 = 16,558
SPX – 0.27 = 1883
NAS + 12 = 4127
10 YR YLD - .04 = 2.60%
OIL - .39 = 99.35
GOLD – 6.40 = 1285.90
SILV - .13 = 19.12

No record high for the Dow today. The Industrial Average was up and down, up and down throughout the day, but couldn’t hold positive territory. Today’s economic reports showed consumer spending increased, as did manufacturing activity, and unemployment claims.

Consumer spending increased 0.9 percent in March after rising by 0.5 percent in February, the largest gain in more than 4-1/2 years. The top 6 automakers backed up the spending report by reporting year over year gains in sales. The spending report supports the notion that cold weather just paused consumer activity and there is pent up demand that will lead to more economic activity in the second quarter. Income increased 0.5 percent in March, the biggest gain since last summer, but with spending outpacing income growth, the saving rate, which is the percentage of disposable income households are socking away, hit a 14-month low.

The Institute for Supply Management said its manufacturing index of national factory activity rose to 54.9 last month, up from 53.7 in March. A reading above 50 indicates expansion in the nation's factories. Manufacturing activity has now accelerated for 3 consecutive months and last month's gains were driven by a pickup in employment, export orders and inventories; although new orders were unchanged.

The Labor Department reports initial claims for state unemployment benefits increased 14,000 to a seasonally adjusted 344,000. Tomorrow morning we’ll get the monthly nonfarm payrolls report; look for 210,000 net new jobs in April and the unemployment rate to dip to 6.6%. That wouldn’t be enough to lift the labor market out of the doldrums but it would be another small step in the right direction.

A couple of news articles caught my attention, one from the Murdoch Street Journal and the other from the NY Times. You are forgiven if you missed them; they deal with banksters, and fraud, and regulators who look the other way, hoping for a post-government job with a golden parachute, and prosecutors without spines.

The Journal story deals with the Swiss units of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, and how they’ve agreed to hand over potentially incriminating details about how they helped Americans evade taxes; in return the banks won’t face prosecution.  Goldman's Swiss private bank had about $12 billion in assets under supervision as of the end of last year. Morgan Stanley's Swiss private bank had $50.7 billion in assets under management as of last year. The other big US banks likely did the same things, but they haven’t worked out a deal just yet.

Goldman and Morgan Stanley figured out the playbook, and it appears to go something like this: Senior officers of the banks aid and abet tax fraud by wealthy American clients, fail to make legally required criminal referrals, fail to comply with subpoenas, and then demand immunity from prosecution. Department of Justice prosecutors pee their pants and cave in to a slap on the wrist deal. No senior banker or bank was prosecuted. No banker was sued civilly by the government. No banker had to pay back his bonus that he “earned” through fraud. And the tax cheats that they aided and abetted have plenty of time to cover their tracks and might get away scot free, because the banksters aren’t required to turn over the client lists.

Then I read a New York Times story that claims federal prosecutors are getting close to criminal charges against at least a couple of major banks: Credit Suisse, for offering tax shelters to Americans, and BNP Paribas for doing business with countries like Sudan and Iran that the US has placed under sanctions. Prosecutors in New York and Washington have apparently held talks with BNP about a guilty plea from the bank’s parent company. Ben Lawsky, New York’s top regulator reportedly plans to impose steep penalties against BNP and its employees but would not revoke the bank’s license. Prosecutors have secured similar assurances from the New York Fed.

The discussions between regulators and prosecutors and lawyers was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, and they demonstrate that defense lawyers were pushing prosecutors not to act without assurances that regulators will keep a bank in business. The question of culpability seems fairly straightforward; BNP conducted its own internal investigation that identified significant volume of transactions that could be considered impermissible under sanctions in place between 2002 and 2009, including improperly routing money through its New York branches.

There doesn’t seem to be a big concern at BNP about the possibility of criminal convictions that might result in loss of the bank’s charter, much less worry over executives facing jail time. It’s as if the criminal acts were performed by ghosts or phantasms.  BNP has set aside $1.1 billion in legal reserves; they expect a fine; it’s the cost of doing business.

Of course this is nothing new; two years ago, HSBC escaped criminal charges for violating economic sanctions and what appeared to be clear cut money laundering. JPMorgan recently paid a $2 billion dollar fine for its role in assisting Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, without having to admit guilt. Of course no one goes to jail. Almost no one. In January, Kareem Serageldin, a mid-to-upper level executive for Credit Suisse (not a CEO or CFO) was sentenced to 30 months in prison for concealing hundreds of millions in losses in the bank’s mortgage backed securities portfolio. Why this guy ended up going to prison and not somebody from Lehman, Bear Stearns, AIG, Countrywide, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Citigroup, HSBC – go figure; there is no rhyme or reason beyond the notion that regulators and prosecutors are simpering little cowards.

It didn’t used to be this way. After the crash of 1929, the Pecora Hearings seized upon public outrage, and the head of the New York Stock Exchange landed in prison. When FDR took office he immediately announced a banking holiday and the bankers snapped to attention. After the savings-and-loan scandals of the 1980s, 1,100 people were prosecuted, including top executives at many of the largest failed banks and S&Ls. In the late 90s and the turn of the century, when the tech bubble burst and revealed widespread corporate accounting scandals, top executives from WorldCom, Enron, Qwest and Tyco, among others, went to prison. And the accounting firm of Arthur Andersen was criminally convicted for its complicity in the fraudulent steaming scam that was Enron; Andersen went out of business in 2002; delivering pink slips to many good and decent accountants along with the pond scum. Since then prosecutors have walked lightly for fear of collateral damage.

Since then, the bankers realized they could act with impunity, and they have. There has been no crackdown following the meltdown of 2008. From 2004 to 2012, the Justice Department reached 242 deferred and nonprosecution agreements with corporations, compared with 26 in the previous 12 years. The idea behind a deferred prosecution agreement, or DPA, is that the banksters stop doing the illegal stuff and if they do any other illegal stuff, the deal is off the table, and prosecutors can come down with full weight for past and current wrongdoing. Instead, there is no follow-up. It’s like a criminal is released on parole, violates parole, violates parole again, and again, and again; and the courts turn a blind eye.

So, now, with the BNP and Credit Suisse cases, the prosecutors goal seems to be criminal prosecution without making the banks actually suffer the consequences of criminal charges. Prosecutors consider them test cases; BNP and Credit Suisse aren’t the biggest banks; prosecutors aren’t sure what would happen with criminal charges; they don’t really know what to expect if they actually get a criminal guilty plea. If they start small, it might mean the end of the BNP tennis tournament or it might mean 200-thousand pink slips for bank employees, or it might be the spark that ignites a financial panic. They overlook the slow, insidious, systemic rot of the foundations of all global financial transactions – trust. In the long run, that seems far more dangerous.

Attorney General Eric Holder has testified before the Senate “that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if we do prosecute, if we do bring a criminal charge, it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy.”

The bank lawyers play on this fear; they claim bank clients -- including trustees, fiduciaries and pension funds -- could be forced to cut ties with a financial institution labeled a criminal enterprise.  Counterparties also might think twice before entering into billion-dollar transactions with such firms. Damaging a bank’s business could lead to broader fallout across the financial industry, just as Lehman’s collapse in 2008 prompted investors to withdraw from other firms on concern its exit would set off a wave of losses. Even the threat of criminal action must be handled in such a way as to not spook customers.  

It seems to be a spurious argument; akin to a doctor telling you that surgery to remove a cancerous tumor is dangerous and painful, so there is nothing to do but let the cancer overwhelm the host, curl up and wait to die. And then there is the more absurd part of the defense; the idea that pension funds would be forced to cut ties with criminal banksters; as if it is perfectly fine to have pension funds and trustees doing business with bankers involved in criminal activity, just so long as there are no official criminal charges. A complete denial of wrongdoing based upon a lack of enforcement. If the cops never arrest the killer, nobody really died. Yea, that’s it, pay no attention to the bloody corpse, pay no attention to the wreckage and devastation of the global financial meltdown; whistle past the graveyard.

You know the meltdown involved criminal wrongdoing; the regulators know it; the prosecutors know it. What they don’t seem to know is the collateral damage from non-enforcement and non-prosecution. Every action has a consequence, and non-action is a form of action.