Morning in Arizona

Morning in Arizona
Rainbows over Canyonlands - Dave Stoker

The Headline Animator

Showing posts with label energy prices. Show all posts
Showing posts with label energy prices. Show all posts

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Neutrality Matters

Financial Review

Neutrality Matters


DOW – 10 = 18,214
SPX – 3 = 2110
NAS + 20 = 4987
10 YR YLD + .05 = 2.01%
OIL – 2.01 = 48.98
GOLD + 5.00 = 1210.20
SILV – .01 = 16.63

The Federal Communications Commission has voted to regulate broadband Internet service as a public utility. Tom Wheeler, the commission chairman, said the FCC was using “all the tools in our toolbox to protect innovators and consumers” and preserve the Internet’s role as a “core of free expression and democratic principles.”

The new rules, approved 3 to 2 along party lines, are intended to ensure that no content is blocked and that the Internet is not divided into pay-to-play fast lanes for Internet and media companies that can afford it and slow lanes for everyone else. Those prohibitions are hallmarks of the net neutrality concept.

Mobile data service for smartphones and tablets, in addition to wired lines, is being placed under the new rules. The order also includes provisions to protect consumer privacy and to ensure that Internet service is available for people with disabilities and in remote areas.

The FCC is taking this big regulatory step by reclassifying high-speed Internet service as a telecommunications service, instead of an information service, under Title II of the Telecommunications Act. The Title II classification comes from the phone company era, treating service as a public utility. But the new rules are an à la carte version of Title II, adopting some provisions and rejecting others. The FCC will not get involved in pricing decisions or the engineering decisions companies make in managing their networks.

The impact of the new rules will largely hinge partly on details that are not yet known. The rules will not be published for at least a couple of days, and will not take effect for probably at least a couple of months. Lawsuits to challenge the commission’s order are widely expected.

Also today, the FCC approved an order to pre-empt state laws that limit the build-out of municipal broadband Internet services. The order focuses on laws in two states, North Carolina and Tennessee, but it would create a policy framework for other states; about 21 states have laws that restrict the activities of community broadband services.

The FCC says state laws unfairly restrict municipal competition with cable and telecommunications broadband providers. This order, too, will surely be challenged in court.

What does net neutrality mean for you? Well, you will still get your internet service from your provider; they just won’t be able to charge you more for high bandwidth, they can’t discriminate, and they can’t just block or slow access to content on a whim – which has happened in the past. That means that some geek in a garage has the same access to the internet as a big company like Netflix or Hulu; and as we’ve learned over the years, geeks in garages sometimes come up with some brilliant stuff. And nothing in today’s FCC action will raise your taxes.

We’ve been hearing from certain pundits for years now about how high inflation was just around the corner; how the Federal Reserve’s low interest policy and massive monetary stimulus would inevitably lead prices to spike, undermining the economic recovery. The hyper-inflationistas were dead wrong. Consumer prices fell again in January and inflation turned negative year over year. The consumer price index dropped a seasonally adjusted 0.7% last month, marking the third decline in a row. Over the past year prices have actually declined by an unadjusted 0.1%, the first time consumer inflation has been negative since the fall of 2009. Energy prices slumped 9.7%, as the cost of most fuels including gas decreased. Food prices were unchanged. Excluding food and energy, so-called core consumer prices rose 0.2% in January. Core prices are also up 1.6% in the past year, mainly reflecting rising prices for housing. Deflationary pressure from the cost of energy and commodities falling has turned into deflation. Whether this is temporary or a longer-term trend remains to be seen.

As a reminder, the Federal Reserve has that 2.0% inflation target, which is nowhere in sight. Until inflation ticks back up, it is hard to imagine that Janet Yellen and her team will raise interest rates rapidly. Even if they start raising rates sooner than expected, it is hard to fathom that this interest rate hiking cycle will be anywhere as severe as what we saw during the 1990s and in other rate hike cycles. Still, the Fed doesn’t expect energy prices to stay low forever. There is little fear that it will lead to an insidious debt-deflation spiral.

For the moment, lower prices, especially lower energy prices are a good thing. Today, oil prices dropped to the lowest levels in a month; a combination of a stronger dollar and a report yesterday showing record high crude supplies in the US. And it’s not just lower prices at the pump and lower energy bills, the cost of inputs, from plastic bottles to detergent, are edging down. Some of the savings are being passed on: food, which is costly to transport and requires a lot of packaging, is cheapening. These are the hallmarks of a positive supply shock: cheap oil means economies can provide more goods at lower prices. In the services sector, which relies much less on energy, transport and oil-based inputs, prices are still rising.

For companies that sell durable goods deflation can be more of a concern, but so far it hasn’t been a problem.  Orders for durable goods rose a seasonally adjusted 2.8% in January, beating expectations. Orders minus transportation edged up 0.3%. Orders for core capital goods, a proxy for business investment, surged 9.5%.

For many industries, however, falling prices are not new, but a way of life; think about how prices have dropped for technology like phones, cameras, and computers. So deflation is unlikely to shock shoppers. Indeed, the boost in purchasing power from a short period of falling prices is welcome, especially for workers that have seen wages stagnate for decades.

Unemployment rates are now below pre-crisis levels and that should have triggered rising wages but we haven’t seen it yet. The number of people who applied for unemployment benefits jumped by 31,000 to 313,000 in the week ending Feb. 21. It was the biggest weekly increase since December 2013. Next week’s jobs report will likely show another solid gain, but there is still slack in the labor market. Jobs may be up but workers’ bargaining power is not.

Even if it is short-lived, this sort of deflation can dull an economy. Companies are sitting on mountains of cash, about $2 trillion more or less; A little inflation would serve as a prod to put that money more quickly to use. This raises a question about how to spark inflation. Over time, the answer is more jobs; more people with paychecks spend more money, creating more demand; and increased demand is the best incentive to invest.

If falling prices endure, then debts, fixed in nominal terms, are harder to pay. And the whiff of deflation is everywhere, not just in the US but around the globe. And we have seen central bankers responding: with Abenomics in Japan, stimulus in China, QE from the ECB, and negative interest rates across much of Europe. If these attempts fail, then the glee at cheap food and fuel will be short-lived, as debt-ridden economies find themselves using up all the savings from falling prices to keep creditors at bay. And the side effect of central bank stimulus is to devalue the local currency, which has resulted in a much stronger US dollar, which means our exports have to be priced competitively and imports are cheaper; which all means that deflation, even a little deflation can be a tricky thing. Enjoy it while you can.

Earnings season is winding down with reports from retailers. JC Penney reported sales rose 4.4%, topping estimates; that was not enough. JC Penney reported a loss of $59 million, or 19 cents a share.

Sears Holdings lost money for an 11th straight quarter. The company lost $1.50 per share, beating the expected loss of $1.89 per share. Sales dropped 24% to $8.1 billion, short of the $8.3 billion estimate.

Gap said profit rose nearly 4% to $319 million, or 75 cents a share, while sales increased nearly 3% to $4.7 billion. Gap offered a muted earnings forecast for the year, blaming the impact of the stronger dollar and shipping delays at West Coast ports. Separately, Gap said it is increasing its annual dividend and that it is setting aside $1 billion to buy back shares.

Google is making its largest bet yet on renewable energy, a $300 million investment to support at least 25,000 SolarCity rooftop power plants.  Google is contributing to a SolarCity fund valued at $750 million, the largest ever created for residential solar. Google has now committed more than $1.8 billion to renewable energy projects, including wind and solar farms on three continents. What really makes the deal interesting is that technology companies are now taking advantage of investment formats once reserved only for banks. The Google deal is structured as a tax-equity transaction, meaning Google gets tax breaks that flow from solar systems financed by the fund. Renewable-energy projects are entitled to various tax benefits, including a credit for 30% of the installed cost of a solar power system. Unprofitable companies, such as SolarCity, often can’t use the credits and provide them instead to tax-equity investors.

Just a week after apologizing for bundling computers with an encryption-breaking adware program known as Superfish, Lenovo said a cyberattack took down its website, although it was not clear who was behind the breach. Hacker group Lizard Squad, which has taken credit for several recent high-profile outages, including Sony’s PlayStation Network and Microsoft’s Xbox Live, has claimed responsibility for the attack.

(I guess we can file that one under “K” for karma, or maybe “P” for payback.)

Wednesday, July 09, 2014

Wednesday, July 09, 2014 - Waiting for Liftoff

Financial Review with Sinclair Noe

DOW + 78 = 16,985
SPX + 9 = 1972
NAS + 27 = 4419
10 YR YLD - .02 = 2.54%
OIL – 1.46 = 101.94
GOLD + 7.00 = 1327.60
SILV + .08 = 21.10
 
The Federal Reserve released the minutes of the most recent FOMC policy meeting from June 17-18.

The Fed is going to take away the punchbowl. As of October, no more punchbowl. That’s it, QE is drying up. I think we all knew that was coming. And then after the Fed stops buying Treasuries and mortgage backed securities, they will get around to probably raising their target on interest rates, but rates would remain near zero for a “considerable time” (probably the spring of 2015) after the Fed halts its program of bond purchases.

According to the minutes, there continues to be division over when the Fed should stop reinvesting proceeds of the $4.2 trillion in assets it purchased to support financial markets. Ending reinvestment will put the central bank's balance sheet on a declining path, and some members argue that should not take place until interest rates have been increased. Fed officials also agreed that the rate of interest on excess reserves would play a “central role” in moving rates higher when the time comes.

And this is a fluid timeline for all this; it is partly dependent on “liftoff”; that’s the new word from the Fed – liftoff. At some point, the economy will slip the surly bonds of earth and wheel, soar, and swing high in the sunlit silence, and do a hundred things we haven’t dreamed of for such a long, long time. Someday, we’ll have liftoff.

The market players looked at the minutes and pulling away the punchbowl, while painful, was an indication of economic strength. Fed officials expressed overall confidence that moderate economic growth will continue and unemployment and inflation will gradually move towards the central bank's targets. A couple of participants noted that consumer spending had been supported importantly by gains in household net worth while income gains had been held back by only modest increases in wages. So, an important element in the economic outlook was a pickup in income, from higher wages as well as ongoing employment gains that would be expected to support a sustained rise in consumer spending. Which is correct in theory; we just haven’t seen the pickup in income.

At the press conference after the June meeting, Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen said that recent inflation readings were “noisy.” According to the minutes, the Fed staff was not concerned with inflation despite some recent higher readings. Although the Fed staff revised its inflation forecast up “a little” in the near term, the medium term projection was revised down slightly.

Yesterday I talked about an anomaly in the jobs number from Thursday. How could we have negative 2.9% GDP in the first quarter while we were adding all those jobs? I concluded that the problem was that productivity was declining.

New data was released this morning showing US productivity growth was the worst since the recession. The data from the Labor Department looks at multifactor productivity, and it includes the impact of capital, new machines, investment in technology, and such. The measure of capital services input grew 1.9%, which is the best showing since 2008, but that is more a reflection of the bounce from the 1st quarter, and still far from the pre-recession levels that were consistently above 3%. So, the data in this morning’s report is consistent with an economy coming out of a recession but nowhere near its pre-recession rate of growth. Bottom line is that productivity needs to increase if the economy is going to get better.

One of the concerns for Fed monetary policy is inflation, which isn’t a problem right now and when we have seen a problem in the past 20 years of so, the Fed has been able to tamp it down. The problems with inflation right now are tied to energy and food prices. Food prices are largely tied to weather, and we have seen some nasty weather, and the Fed can’t control the weather. Extreme weather will be an ongoing problem, and rising food prices will be an ongoing challenge, but for now, it’s a short term inflation problem.

Energy prices are largely tied to geopolitical problems in the Middle East. Iraq, Israel, Syria, and other problems could explode out of control at any given moment, but we’ve seen crude oil prices dropping for 9 sessions. The problem in Iraq may very well result in the country splitting apart, but the southern regions, which produce and export the most oil, will likely continue exporting oil. So, the oil traders don’t seem concerned about Iraq divided in 3 parts. Meanwhile, Ukraine hasn’t unfolded as Putin planned. Kiev did not roll over. Sanctions are painful. Putin doesn’t look like he wants to escalate the fight; at least not today.

Meanwhile, the US is more or less on track to pass Russia and Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest producer of crude oil within the next 5 years. Domestic crude output is increasing but the increase is coming from shale and shale is notoriously tricky and expensive to extract. The US will continue to extract more shale oil but certain projects, even mega-projects, have been abandoned because of the expense. We know that there are huge reserves in the US, but it doesn’t always pay to pump it; so the increase in output may not be as strong as hoped. For now, prices are high and oil extraction is soaring at shale formations from Texas to North Dakota as companies split apart rocks using high-pressure liquid, or fracking. The result is that now Oklahoma has more earthquakes than California, and we are less dependent on foreign oil.

The United States has just become the world’s biggest oil producer, at least when you consider crude oil plus natural gas together. The US has been the top global nat gas producer for the past 4 years, but a new report from Bank of America says that in the first six months of this year the US overtook Saudi Arabia and Russia to become the top producer of petroleum product, that is oil and natural gas and the liquids that are separated from nat gas.

Annual investment in oil and gas in the US is at a record $200 billion, reaching 20% of the country’s total private fixed-structure spending for the first time, but it will take some time for that investment to work its way through the rest of the economy. We now produce about 11 million barrels a day of crude oil and we consume about 18.5 million barrels a day. So despite the boom, we still import oil and we are still dependent on OPEC. If we converted from oil and gasoline to nat gas, starting running more cars on compressed natural gas, we could become energy independent in short order.

The other side of the equation remains conservation and not just a switch to nat gas but a switch to renewable energy. You think green energy is too expensive? Tosh; tosh and falderal. Global energy markets are reaching a tipping point. For the first time, a large fraction of the world's fossil fuels could be replaced at a lower cost by clean energy, with today's renewable technologies and prices. And virtually no further investments in fossil fuels make long-term economic sense because higher fossil fuel prices over their useful life will be exorbitant.

Barclay's Bank recently downgraded the entire US utility sector in fear that it would not respond to the disruptive challenge of distributed solar. The Barclays credit team believes that, over the next few years, the “confluence of declining cost trends in distributed solar photovoltaic (PV) power generation and residential-scale power storage is likely to disrupt the status quo.” The new government in India is cutting fossil fuel subsidies and promising to provide rooftop solar for 400 million homes. Conservation is another important element. Profitable building retrofits would cut fossil fuel used for heating and cooling by 20%, and displace another 15% of fossil fuel electricity demand.

International oil companies are hitting the wall on the price they will pay for big new oil projects. There is plenty of oil in Ohio but BP, in its last quarterly report, announced it would halt development of the Utica shale fields. Along with BP, Chevron, Shell, Total, Statoil, and Exxon have all cancelled or delayed mega projects or even sold off major investments in US oil projects
The latest Bloomberg New Energy Finance projection suggests that 2/3 of incremental global power generation over the next fifteen years will come from renewables. Declines in coal use in developed economies will be sharp enough to cut the global share of fossil fuels from 64% today to only 44% in 2030.

Electricity currently provides only 1% of global transportation energy; EV's and rail could today replace the first 15% of the oil used by cars and trucks at with an internal rate of return higher than 15%. Fossil fuels generate 63% of the world's power, renewables less than 5%, but 1/3 of fossil electricity now costs more than competing wind and solar. And that doesn’t even begin to factor in the externalities associated with fossil fuels.

A couple of quick notes as we wrap up. Citigroup is reportedly close to paying about $7 billion to resolve a probe into whether it defrauded investors on billions of dollars’ worth of mortgage securities in the run-up to the financial crisis. A majority of the settlement is expected to be in cash, but the figure also includes several billion dollars in help to struggling borrowers. An announcement of the settlement between the bank and the Department of Justice could come as early as next week.

This bit of economic data came in late this afternoon. The Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service shows the Phoenix market saw overall sales in June drop 11% year over year; now back to the lowest sales since 2008. Non-cash sales were up 6% year over year, but cash sales were down 40%; so it looks like investors are moving on. Active inventory is up 43% year over year and at the highest level for June since 2011. So, sales are down, inventory is very high, and cash is scarce.

When do we start QE4?