Morning in Arizona

Morning in Arizona
Rainbows over Canyonlands - Dave Stoker

The Headline Animator

Showing posts with label U-6. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U-6. Show all posts

Friday, December 08, 2017

November 2017 Jobs Report

Financial Review

November 2017 Jobs Report


DOW + 117 = 24,329
SPX + 14 = 2651
NAS + 27 = 6840
RUT + 1 = 1521
10 Y + .01 = 2.38%
OIL + .67 = 57.36
GOLD + .90 = 1248.70

Cryptocurrency

Top Cryptocurrencies

  Name Symbol Price USD Market Cap Volume (24h) Total Vol. % Price BTC Chg. % 1D Chg. % 7D

Bitcoin BTC 15,990.0 $276.87B $21.19B 60.04% 1 -3.69% +51.10%

Ethereum ETH 442.86 $43.91B $2.35B 6.66% 0.0282401 +6.71% -2.23%

Bitcoin Cash BCH 1,390.00 $24.71B $2.56B 7.26% 0.0906245 +12.80% +0.18%

IOTA MIOTA 4.87100 $13.84B $910.05M 2.58% 0.00030818 +18.80% +254.38%

Ripple XRP 0.23333 $9.79B $661.69M 1.87% 0.00001563 +14.89% -1.52%

Litecoin LTC 127.820 $6.82B $1.52B 4.30% 0.00778303 +30.51% +27.24%

NEM XEM 0.63875 $5.87B $252.16M 0.71% 0.00004038 +126.04% +171.44%

Dash DASH 702.00 $5.63B $288.67M 0.82% 0.0450115 +5.92% -8.31%

Bitcoin Gold BTG 238.58 $4.36B $179.46M 0.51% 0.0161369 +11.23% -15.69%

Monero XMR 260.48 $4.26B $200.65M 0.57% 0.0170735 +0.27% +44.91%

The economy added 228,000 new jobs in November, beating expectations for about 200,000. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.1%, a 17-year low.

October job gains were revised lower, to 244,000 from 261,000. The increase in jobs in September was raised to 38,000 from 18,000. Hurricane damage skewed the past two employment reports, with the storms temporarily pushing hundreds of thousands of workers, particularly in the service sector, out of their jobs.

They largely flocked back in October, accounting for much of the month’s larger-than-usual job growth. Payrolls for September and October were revised up by a combined 3 thousand. Accounting for these revisions, job gains have averaged 170,000 over the last three months.

In the first 10 months of the Trump administration the economy has added 1.7 million jobs. In the last 10 months of the Obama administration, the economy added 1.85 million jobs. For the full year of 2016, the economy added 2.24 million jobs.

The United States has now added jobs for 86 consecutive months — a downward blip in September was later revised to show a small gain — and the unemployment rate is lower than it ever got during the last boom, which ended when the housing bubble burst.

Job growth has gradually slowed since 2014, when the American economy added close to three million jobs. But hiring remains remarkably steady. Employers are on track to add about two million jobs in 2017, a solid pace 8 years into an economic expansion.

What we haven’t seen is a substantial increase in wage growth. Worker pay rose 5 cents, or 0.2%, to an average of $26.55 an hour. The yearly increase in hourly pay moved up to 2.5% from 2.3%; this means that over the past year, average hourly earnings have risen by 64 cents; an improvement but still tepid wage growth.

The increase in average hourly earnings is barely enough to keep up with inflation. The average workweek for all employees increased by 0.1 hour to 34.5 hours in November. So, wages didn’t really go up, workers just worked a little longer.

The Labor Force Participation Rate was unchanged in November at 62.7%. This is the percentage of the working age population in the labor force. So, while the labor market is strong, it was not strong enough to pull workers off the sidelines. Or perhaps more significantly, companies were not offering enough in wages to pull workers off the sidelines.

The unemployment rate is approaching the level many economists consider “full employment” — the point at which essentially everyone who wants a job can find one. But the unemployment rate may not fully reflect the number of available workers. Many employers are starting to complain about the lack of available workers – but we still do not see a big move in wage increases.

If workers are so hard to find, why aren’t companies raising pay? The simple answer is that there are plenty of people who still want a job, they just might not be an employers’ ideal candidate. We need to train workers or pay up for trained workers.

The U-6 unemployment rate ticked up to 8% from 7.9% in October. The headline unemployment rate or U-3 is at 4.1%. The U-6 includes the unemployed plus people who are marginally attached to the labor force or working part time for economic reasons. Year-over-year, however, the 8% rate marks an improvement; in November 2016, the figure stood at 9%.

The health care sector added 30,000 jobs. This has been one of the fastest growing sectors in the labor market, but not all those jobs offer good wages. The home health aide industry, paying workers about $22,000 per year, will produce an estimated 425,600 positions by 2026.

Education gained 24,000. Professional and business services added 46,000.

Manufacturing gained 31,000 and a total of 189,000 jobs over the past 12 months. What’s more, manufacturers have now added just over 1 million new jobs since industry employment fell to a post-World War II low of 11.45 million in early 2010. These companies now employ 12.5 million Americans.

Construction added 24,000 in November and a total of 132,000 for the 12 months. Leisure and hospitality up 14,000. Transportation gained 10,000. Financial activities 8,000. And government added 7,000 new jobs.

Retail gained over 18,000 jobs. Many of the jobs in retail are seasonal. Retailers hired 595,000 workers in October and November, this is up from just over 509,000 for the same period last year, and about the same level as the previous four years. This is a good indicator for holiday shopping sales.

The holiday shopping season had a strong kick-off to the year. Sales got off to a great start on Black Friday weekend, and a massive shift toward online shopping has sent shippers scrambling to catch up. Packages are taking longer to arrive, and it might get worse.

One caveat: Gasoline prices usually don’t rise in November, but this time they did. That will make retail sales look even better, even though it puts a dent into the finances of consumers.

In a separate report today, the University of Michigan consumer sentiment index dipped to a 3-month low of 96.8. Consumers are by and large upbeat. They’re expecting higher income, and higher inflation as well.

So long as the job market is strong — and the latest report from the Labor Department was — the economy should be in pretty good shape. Consumer expectations fell, while consumers said the current situation improved. The economy seems good now, but we are concerned it will get worse.

Policymakers at the Federal Reserve have sent clear signals that they plan to raise the benchmark interest rate at their meeting next week. It would probably have taken a nearly catastrophic jobs report to change that — and today’s report was a little better than expected.

If the economy continues to add jobs at the current rate, it probably means more rate hikes in 2018 – and especially if wages start to rise more quickly — Fed officials could feel pressure to raise rates faster to head off inflation.

There are also political implications to be drawn from the labor market. At the heart of the Republican tax plan hurtling through Congress is an implicit promise that cutting corporate taxes will lift the middle class through higher wages and more jobs.

Speaker Paul Ryan, for example, said in a recent speech that “fixing the business side of our tax code is really all about helping families and workers,” adding that “cutting the corporate tax rate means more jobs here in the United States. It will foster increased competition, which will directly drive up wages for our workers.”

Yet few American companies have offered specific plans that support those promises. The lack of pledges to create jobs has not been lost on Trump’s top economic adviser, Gary Cohn. At a recent Wall Street Journal conference, Cohn asked his audience of chief executives how many of them would invest more if the tax cut were passed.

When only a few attendees raised their hands, Cohn asked: “Why aren’t the other hands up?”

A few companies say they plan to hire if tax cuts are passed, but most will be looking at share buybacks, increased dividends, or just hoarding the cash. This highlights a critical question over who would benefit the most from the tax bill: shareholders or workers?

The promise of the administration is that a tax overhaul will result in faster economic growth, which will lead to more investment and will eventually trickle down in the form of higher wages. And there is near unanimous consensus among economists that the tax bill will not grow the economy.

Wage growth has remained relatively sluggish over the past several years, even as corporate profits hover near all-time highs as a share of the economy, and the unemployment rate continues to fall to levels that economists normally associate with rapid increases in worker pay. Corporate profit rates have been historically high since 2007, while business investment has been historically low, and that hasn’t been enough to spark meaningful gains in wages.

Productivity growth remains low, inching up at an average annual rate of 1.2 percent over the last eight years, compared with its historic rate of 2.1 percent from 1974 to 2017. There is a strong chance that business could invest in equipment to improve productivity, rather than investing in workers’ wages.

It is possible that a tax cut could increase wages even if companies do not intend it to, but that could just be because there is less slack in the labor market, where unemployment is hovering just above 4 percent.

Frankly it’s time to give up the charade that eliminating estate taxes for Ivanka Trump and her brothers or creating a lower “pass-through” rate for President Trump’s maze of LLC’s is going to boost the economy in the way we now need. We have jobs; we need higher skilled workers and other elements to make workers richer.

What would spur productivity and in turn raise wages? Invest in infrastructure, move capable workers to where the jobs are, get the best and the brightest people from around the world to immigrate here, invest in R & D, improve schools (for all the education “reform,” American students still trail their foreign peers in math) and create a path for teaching high-skill trades outside the four-year college system.

Friday, September 01, 2017

August Jobs, meh.

Financial Review

August Jobs, meh.


DOW + 39 = 21,987
SPX + 4 = 2476
NAS + 6 = 6435
RUT + 8 = 1413
10 Y + .04 = 2.16
OIL + .12 = 47.35
GOLD + 3.60 = 1325.40

Top Cryptocurrencies
  Name Symbol Market Cap Vol. Total Vol. % Price USD Price BTC Chg. % 1D Chg. % 7D
  Bitcoin BTC $80.01B $2.83B 31.34% $4,837.84 1 2.68% 11.49%
  Ethereum ETH $35.61B $941.45M 10.43% $377.26 0.0777541 -2.68% 14.29%
  Bitcoin Cash BCH $10.31B $461.22M 5.11% $622.85 0.128371 5.55% -2.28%
  Ripple XRP $9.29B $261.70M 2.90% $0.24 0.00004991 -2.84% 10.22%
  Litecoin LTC $4.37B $1.76B 19.50% $82.95 0.0170879 12.19% 63.35%
  Dash DASH $2.91B $60.05M 0.67% $386.19 0.0795583 1.99% 16.67%
  NEM XEM $2.84B $9.73M 0.11% $0.32 0.000065 -1.97% 18.40%
  IOTA MIOTA $2.09B $34.03M 0.38% $0.75 0.00015472 -13.02% -17.19%
  Monero XMR $2.06B $182.10M 2.02% $137.21 0.0282676 -0.66% 14.07%
  Ethereum Classic ETC $2.04B $1.01B 11.22% $21.40 0.00440996 29.90% 40.66%

The economy added 156,000 jobs in August, missing expectations for around 180,000. The unemployment rate rose a tick to 4.4% from 4.3%; last month’s rate was a 16-year low.

The government cut its estimate of new jobs created in July to 189,000 from 209,000. June’s gain was trimmed to 210,000 from 231,000. A net loss of 41,000 jobs in the revisions. The US have averaged 185,000 new jobs a month since June — more than twice as many as needed to put all the new people entering the labor force each month to work. August marked the 83rd straight month of U.S. job growth, the longest such streak on record.

The data mark the seventh straight August that the government’s initial payrolls print has missed the median estimate of economists; the figure has been revised upward in five of the past six years. The trend may be explained in part by a seasonal adjustment process for the new school year. For one thing, August is the second most popular month for vacations.

As a result, businesses are slower to respond to the government’s survey on how many workers they employed or hired. True to form the initial response rate last month was 70%, marking the lowest of 2017. By contrast, the average rate of response from January through July was 76.5%.

Government employment reportedly fell by 9,000 last month but many economists are skeptical. Labor Department bean counters try to adjust for seasonal swings in educational employment in August and September but they often miss the mark.

Not surprisingly, the preliminary estimate for August has undercounted the number of new jobs by an average of 50,000 a year. So, even though today’s report was bad, it wasn’t anything to get bent out of shape about. Not yet anyway – let’s see how the revisions go.

The report may represent the cleanest reading on the labor market for several months, as Hurricane Harvey’s fallout in the Houston region begins to affect the data in coming weeks. While the storm may depress payrolls at first, jobs will probably get a subsequent boost as construction and utility workers help rebuild housing and infrastructure.

The Labor Department data are based on surveys that reflect payrolls and Americans’ work status for the week that includes the 12th of the month. Harvey made landfall on Aug. 25. So, we can expect a negative impact to the September report.

Yet even after the creation of millions of new jobs during the current recovery and the lowest unemployment rate in a decade and a half, worker wages still aren’t rising all that rapidly. Pay rose 0.1% in August to an average of $26.39 an hour. Wages have risen 2.5% in the past 12 months, unchanged from July.

Pay usually rises 3% to 4% a year at this stage of an economic recovery, but a slew of factors including global competition and the retirement of higher-paid baby boomers may be holding wages back. Average workweek for all workers fell to 34.4 hours from 34.5 hours (forecast was 34.5 hours).

A so-called hidden reserve of unemployed Americans may also be keeping wages down. A broader measure of joblessness, the U-6, or underemployment rate, was 8.6 percent for a third month; U-6 includes part-time workers who’d prefer a full-time position and people who want a job but aren’t actively looking.

Employees working part-time for economic reasons fell by 27,000 to 5.26 million. was flat at 8.6%, but the U-6 rate hovered below 8% shortly before the 2007-2009 recession. More Americans who’ve been out of work for long periods are rejoining the labor force in light of a near record number of job openings.

Private employment increased by 165,000 (forecast was 172,000) after a 202,000 advance; government payrolls fell by 9,000. In August, manufacturers, construction firms and health care providers account for more than half of all the hiring.

Manufacturing added 38,000 jobs. Construction jobs rose by 28,000, the most since February; retail hiring was up 800, the first increase since January; leisure and hospitality was up 4,000 following a 58,000 gain.

Professional and business services added 40,000. Financial Activities added 10,000. Transportation added just under 2,000.

Manufacturing was a shining star in today’s report, posting one of the best months in a long time. The average workweek for production workers increased by a tenth of an hour to 42.1 hours, while average overtime also increased by a tenth to 4.4 hours.

Aggregate number of hours worked by production workers jumped by 0.7%, the most in three years. Hiring was particularly strong in the motor-vehicle sector, where employment rose by 13,700 on a seasonally adjusted basis, the most since February 2014.

August is always the strongest month for hiring in autos, as the plants resume full-scale production after a summer lull for retooling. On a not-seasonally adjusted basis, hiring in autos was 30,000 in August, the best since 2013. All this is great news for a beaten-down manufacturing sector.

The Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing index surged to a six-year high in August at 58.8%. The employment index also hit a six-year high. Maybe we are starting to see an upturn in manufacturing, or maybe we are seeing some statistical noise. Give it a month or two.

Last month, when the jobs number came in at 209,000 (revised lower today) and the unemployment rate hit a 16-year low, the White House press secretary (I think it was Sean Spicer) claimed White house credit for the strong jobs report. I haven’t heard any announcement from the White House for today’s jobs number. That tells you something about the disappointing number today.

What it really tells us is that the White House really isn’t the all-important force behind job growth in the economy, certainly not this early in the administration. At this point, the things the administration has or has not done, have had little impact on the broader economy.

There are many ways that political leaders can affect the economy, but right now the federal budget has not changed and won’t for at least another month. Tax and spending policies have not changed from last year, and there are no Trump appointments to the Federal Reserve, so monetary policy has not changed from a political standpoint. Think of the economy as a big ship, a really big ship; it does not turn on a dime.

Job growth has averaged 170,000 new positions per month since February, the first full month of the administration. That is below the 208,000 new positions per month in the last six months of 2016. The slower pace of job creation should not be surprising – it is part of the business cycle. With the unemployment rate at 4.4%, employers are somewhat constrained in finding the right candidates to fill open positions.

Meanwhile, wage growth was stagnant in the August report, up just 0.1% – this is not normal at this point in the cycle. As the labor market tightens, we would expect wages to increase. We have been expecting wages to increase for over a year. It hasn’t happened.

Wages grew 2.5% year-over-year, which is right where it has been for a few years now (give or take a little), but well below normal going back a couple of decades. Millions of workers remain on the sidelines. Many of those workers have just left the market – the retiring baby boom generation is once again having a profound impact on the economy – this time the labor market, but that is not the only factor.

The labor force participation rate for 25-54-year-old workers dropped by 0.3% to 78.4% – this bit of data represents people in their prime working years. We still have people on the sidelines, or maybe working in the gig economy and not showing up in the official numbers – hard to tell which – but the result is still slack in the labor market.

Traders now assume a 30 percent chance of a rate increase when Fed policy makers meet in December, down from a 50 percent chance a few weeks ago. The Fed is set to meet later this month, but is not expected to raise rates.

That is not just today’s jobs report but also consider the PCE gauge of inflation which came in at a 1.4% rate in yesterday’s report – well below the Fed’s target of 2%. Given the usual uncertainties that are attached to these monthly numbers, this report should not change expectations of an economy that, in the absence of a major policy effort out of Washington, tracks a real growth path of around 2 percent with muted inflation.

It will, however, solidify market expectations of a continued dovish Fed, including a lower endpoint for the neutral rate and a longer path to get there, along with a very gradual contraction of the balance sheet. Janet Yellen’s best bet might be to just phone it in until February.

One wild card in the second half of 2017 will be gasoline prices. The surge following Hurricane Harvey’s devastation in Texas will leave less money for consumers to spend on other goods and services.

On Friday morning, the average price for regular gasoline nationwide was $2.52, a 7-cent increase from Thursday. Prices have risen 15 cents a gallon in the last week, and the current price is 30 cents above the national average for regular gasoline a year ago. Over the course of a year, every penny increase is equivalent to a $1 billion tax on consumers.

Friday, March 10, 2017

February Jobs Report

Financial Review

February Jobs Report


DOW + 44 = 20,902
SPX + 7 = 2372
NAS + 22 = 5861
RUT + 5 = 1365
10 Y – .02 = 2.58%
OIL – .84 = 48.44
GOLD + 3.70 = 1205.50

The US added 235,000 new jobs in February, and the unemployment rate dropped to 4.7% from 4.8%. The consensus estimate was for about 210,000 new jobs.

The Bureau of Labor Stats said 238,000 new jobs were created in January instead of 227,000. December’s gain was trimmed to 155,000 from 157,000. In February, the year-over-year change was 2.35 million jobs. It was the 83rd straight month of job creation.

Over the past three months, including revisions announced today, monthly job growth has averaged 209,000, while year-over-year wage growth jumped up to 2.8 percent.

In February, average hourly earnings for private payrolls increased by 6 cents to $26.09, following a 5-cent increase in January. Over the year, average hourly earnings have risen by 71 cents, or 2.8 percent.

Hours worked was unchanged at 34.4 a week. The Labor Force Participation Rate increased slightly to 63.0% in February, indicating more people were in the labor pool. The U-6 unemployment rate, which measures unemployed workers, plus underutilized or part-time for economic reasons, dropped to 9.2% from 9.4%.

In February, construction employment increased by 58,000 (this was likely the result of a very warm month); employment in private educational services rose by 29,000; manufacturing added 28,000 jobs; health care employment rose by 27,000; employment in professional and business services continued to trend up in February, gaining 37,000 – the industry has added 597,000 jobs over the year; employment in mining increased by 8,000 in February; Government added 8,000 jobs, meaning private payrolls increased by 227,000 for the month.

Retail trade employment lost 26,000 jobs in February, following a gain of 40,000 in the prior month. First, retailers hired too many people for the holidays. Sales never came back in January and workers got pink slips in February. Sales have started off slow in the first quarter thanks to tax-refund delays.

As we reported yesterday, jobless claims are near a 44-year low. Recruiters and employers complain that qualified workers are scarce, pushing them to raise wages and strengthen benefits. Even lower-skill workers in some sectors are finding themselves in more demand.

Staffing agency Manpower North America’s annual survey of 2,200 hiring managers showed that 46 percent reported they had difficulty filling job vacancies in 2016, up from 32 percent in 2015.

Where you live and what you do for work can determine how bright your job prospects are. Those who reside in or near larger cities are receiving the highest gains, despite high housing costs. Large metropolitan counties have seen more than twice the annual wage growth of non-metropolitan areas, per the latest figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

This jobs report marked the first full report for the Trump administration; the January report was based on data collected before the inauguration. White House press secretary Sean Spicer tweeted: “Great news for American workers: economy added 235,000 new jobs, unemployment rate drops to 4.7% in first report for @POTUS Trump.”

And while it was a good report, it is 3,000 fewer jobs than January. Technically, Spicer violated an obscure federal rule against federal officials touting public data too soon after the official release of the data; maybe Spicer can nominate that rule for deregulation.

The Drudge Report published a headline: “Great Again + 235,000”.  And then Trump retweeted the headline. But in the past Trump has called the same monthly report “phony” and a “hoax.” During a press conference in 2015, Trump said the unemployment rate, then at 5.1%, was phony and the real rate of unemployment was closer to 42%. In today’s press conference Spicer said Trump had told him, “They may have been phony in the past, but it’s very real now.”

And while the jobs report is an imperfect measure, it is the most accurate gauge of the labor market that we have. And while it is correct to credit or blame any given administration with specific numbers from the day of inauguration on, Trump did virtually nothing to affect the numbers.

By mid-February, Trump had done nothing that would have a direct impact on the economy. No changes to the tax code or federal spending had been enacted at that point. What about those jobs he saved at the Carrier air conditioning manufacturing plant? Well, that was great, but it was only about 1,000 jobs out of an economy with 146 million jobs – not enough to move the needle.

On the other hand, it is entirely plausible that increased consumer confidence and what some are calling animal spirits, is enough to persuade some business owners to start hiring; maybe animal spirits pushed home builders to hire 58,000 construction workers or maybe very warm weather across the country was enough; but attitudes still must be confirmed by current conditions.

And contrary to Trump’s claims that he inherited a mess, the economy, while far from perfect, is better. The 235,000 extra jobs that have Drudge and Trump so enthused are fewer than the results in four of the 12 months of 2016. The unemployment rate has hovered between 4.6 percent and 5 percent for 18 consecutive months, since September 2015.

Yes, President Trump deserves the credit for the economy’s performance from the day of his inauguration until the day he leaves office – as with all presidents. Trying to come up with a different way of measuring a president’s performance is likely to get too muddled. Yes, the economy is still benefiting from Obama’s presidency, but, these aren’t his numbers anymore.

The question is whether the numbers can be sustained. Can we see 300,000-plus new jobs per month? Can we see the unemployment rate drop to 4.5% or 4% or 3.5%? Where will we find qualified workers to fill those jobs of the future? Will employers finally have to pay for those qualified workers? Are the current numbers sustainable or is the economy at or near full employment?

Probably not, the recovery has been uneven and we should be able to add many more jobs. But can we add 2.35 million jobs or more in the next 12 months? And don’t forget, the Fed is tapping on the brakes.

The Federal Reserve has been wary of signs of wage-push inflation. Fed policy makers want to maintain control of inflation and so have begun to slowly raise rates, which makes borrowing and risk-taking more expensive. At the same time, the Fed wants to avoid putting the brakes on job hiring.

Today’s solid jobs report is the last major economic data before the Fed determines monetary policy at their FOMC meeting next Tuesday and Wednesday, and it appears to clear the way for an interest rate hike next week.

While hiring was robust and wage gains strong, the pace might not be fast enough to force the central bank to accelerate its timeline for future rate hikes from the current forecast of three. Dot plot expectations on rates for 2018 by Fed members could also tick higher.

For several years, back to Bernanke and including Yellen, the Fed has argued for fiscal stimulus. The Fed managed to goose Wall Street with Zero Interest Rate Policy and QE 1,2,3,4 – which avoided a meltdown, but it was never enough to get the economy firing on all cylinders. The economy is not a mess but it ain’t great.

Fiscal flow or government spending is flat year over year, and that’s causing economic growth to decelerate to zero. The forecast for first-quarter GDP growth is now down to 1.3%, and we’ll get that only if we’re lucky. It’ll probably be closer to zero.

And while Wall Street has been enjoying a dose of animal spirits, fiscal policy takes longer to sink in; tax cuts, deregulation, and infrastructure spending goes through committees and votes. We’ll be lucky to feel the impact in 18 months, if all goes smoothly; and there is no guarantee that things will go smoothly.

Meanwhile, the Fed is tapping the brakes. The transition from monetary policy as an economic driver to fiscal policy is difficult and can easily result in recession.

Rates will rise, prices will go up. If you have debt, you will pay more. If you want to buy something on credit, you will pay more, or you won’t buy it. Housing will become less affordable. Credit card purchases will be more expensive, you might want to keep that card in your wallet. A new car? Maybe not.

And that infrastructure spending the government is planning – it needs to be financed – and that financing will come at a higher rate, adding to the deficit. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin sent letters to congressional leaders on Thursday asking them to raise the debt ceiling by midnight on March 15 to prevent the Treasury from needing to take “extraordinary measures” for the federal government to keep paying its bills.

This Sunday, at 2 AM, most of the nation will move its clocks forward one hour. Daylight Saving Time reminds us of the sun’s daily effect on our lives and tells us spring is on its way. A Department of Energy study found Daylight Saving, saves the nation about 1.3 billion kilowatt-hours, equal to the yearly energy used by more than 100,000 households.

However, not everyone agrees it offers energy saving benefits. Some studies claim the time switch saves energy on lighting but is surpassed by usage increases for heating and air-conditioning. In Arizona, we do not observe daylight-saving, we have plenty of sunshine in the summer and don’t need more.

Friday, February 03, 2017

Jobs Report Friday

Financial Review

Jobs Report Friday


DOW + 186 = 20,071
SPX + 16 = 2297
NAS + 30 = 5666
RUT + 19 = 1377
10 Y + .02 = 2.49%
OIL + .55 = 54.09
GOLD + 3.60 = 1220.00

The economy gained 227,000 new jobs in January, up from 157,000 in December. The unemployment rate rose to 4.8% from 4.7%, mostly because more people were looking for work. Job openings are near a record high and that’s drawing a larger share of Americans back into the labor force.

Revised estimates from December and November cut 39,000 jobs from the total payroll increases. There were 157,000 new jobs created in December instead of 156,000. November’s gain was chopped to 164,000 from 204,000. Year-over-year in January, the economy gained 2.34 million jobs.

In January, hourly wages rose just 0.1% ( or 3 cents) to $26 an hour. The average workweek was unchanged at 34.4 hours. Slow growth in wages brought the year-over-year pace back down to 2.5%, after rising at a 2.9% clip in December.

And while that is higher than the 1.6% pace of inflation, we just aren’t seeing wage-push inflationary pressures, meaning wages are not causing inflation; suggesting there is still slack in the labor market.

Still, certain jobs and sectors are very tight indeed. Many small and medium sized businesses are facing labor shortages, especially for tech workers. And we are seeing a generational shift for skilled workers; such as mechanics and welders, and there have been some shortages because we got away from training and apprenticeship programs.

At the low end of the pay scale, local minimum wage increases – ranging from as little as 5 cents an hour in Florida and Alaska to $1.95 an hour in Arizona – affected approximately 4.3 million workers across 19 states in January.

The widest impact was felt in Arizona, California, and Washington, where more than 1 in 10 workers got a raise. Still, not enough to make a difference in wages, and apparently not a cause to cut back on hiring.

The causes behind the weak wage growth aren’t easily pinned down. While the government’s annual bench-marking process might have had some trickle-down effect, the turning over of the calendar year also could share the blame.

Bonus season probably results in some fluctuation in reporting on pay, with businesses revising those increases back down when end-year plans changed. The lower-than-expected reading on pay could also be attributed to the mix of jobs that were added, such as retail, which are generally low-paying jobs.

One possible reason for flat wages is the lack of labor mobility. Firm-specific wages are evidence of an uncompetitive labor market. After all, if workers could move freely between firms, that should equalize the pay workers of similar experience and education obtain across firms within an industry or geography.

And the further into the labor market you drill down, to workers in narrowly defined skill and experience groups, the more residual inequality is apparent. If you only have one firm where you can use your skills, a condition known as monopsony, the result is flat wages.

One reason for monopsony might be anti-compete clauses. Another reason might be that many people were locked into their homes in the Great recession, unable to move due to negative equity, resulting in a lack of labor mobility.

The share of working age adults in the labor force is still at historical lows. The labor force participation rate, or the share of working-age Americans who are employed or at least looking for a job, was at 62.9 percent in January, the highest level since September.

A broader measure of unemployment which includes discouraged workers and people working part-time but would prefer full-time, the U-6 unemployment rate rose to 9.4%. There are about 5.8 million unemployed or underemployed, and the number of people working part-time for economic reasons increased, suggesting there is still some slack in the labor market.

Manufacturing payrolls increased by 5,000 jobs, rising for a second straight month as the oil-related drag on the sector eases. Construction employment jumped 36,000, the largest increase since March, after December’s paltry 2,000 gain.

An unusually high number of people said poor weather in trades such as construction prevented them from working in December. Those jobs usually turn up, statistically speaking, in the following month.

Retail payrolls, surprisingly surged 46,000, the biggest rise since February. Retailers, including Macy’s, Sears, American Apparel, and Abercrombie & Fitch announced job cuts in January amid store closures. Department store sales are being undercut by online retailers, led by Amazon.com.

So why the bump in retail employment? Well retailers hired fewer people than usual for the holiday season, meaning they probably laid off fewer workers in January as well.

Financial activities added 32,000 jobs last month. Professional and technical services rose by 23,000. Employment in food and hospitality increased by 30,000. And health care added 18,000.

Government employment fell for a fourth straight month in January. Further declines are likely after the Trump administration enforced a hiring freeze on civilian federal government workers on Jan. 22.

The head of the Congressional Budget Office, Keith Hall told the House Budget Committee that this year’s federal deficit will drop to $559 billion, down from a deficit of $587 billion in fiscal 2016, but will explode to $1.4 trillion a year by 2027.

The deficits are expected to grow above 3% of GDP after 2019, in part because of an insufficient labor force associated with retiring baby boomers, and the continued growth in spending. The nonpartisan office based its projections on the assumption on current laws remaining in place; the agency does not speculate on the effect of proposed legislation on the deficit.

The January Jobs Report marks the end of the Obama Administration and the beginning of the Trump Administration tracking the labor market. And while Trump took credit for the jobs gained in January, it wasn’t that long ago that he declared the unemployment rate a phony, totally fictitious number. He claimed the real unemployment rate was not somewhere under 5% but rather closer to 42%; which is nowhere near reality.

Still, Trump has an almost valid point, even if his math is imaginary. Trump’s skepticism toward the unemployment rate is clearly rooted in political self-interest—if he treated the number as legitimate, he would have to acknowledge that the economy improved significantly under President Obama. By undermining public trust in government data, he also makes it harder for anybody to hold his administration accountable for the economy’s performance.

The new president promises his plans will create 25 million new jobs in the next decade. It would be the most jobs created under any U.S. president ever, topping even the nearly 23 million jobs added under President Bill Clinton during the boom years of the 1990s.

That won’t be easy, and it almost certainly will not happen. First, the population is aging; boomers are retiring; there just aren’t enough young workers to replace the boomers, certainly not without massive immigration. Next, automation is coming; robots will be doing more and more work. Robots are not counted in the Jobs Report.

Next, the rest of the global economy has slowed – it’s not just America. It won’t be easy to manufacture 4% growth in the US, while the rest of the world slogs along. Good luck, but don’t hold your breath.

Meanwhile, back to those fictitious unemployment numbers. Trump has a point; 4.8% unemployment rate is misleading; the economy is not nearly as rosy as that number would suggest. Like all economic indicators, it has shortcomings, and those weaknesses have grown more problematic since the Great Recession. If an administration wanted to benchmark its economic performance by focusing on a single headline statistic, this might be a good time to pick a new one.

Fortunately, the Labor Department has six different measures U-1 through U-6; the headline number, the number cited most often is U-3 which is now at 4.8%; a person is lumped into that category if they’ve looked for a job in the past 12 months but not in the past four weeks.

Known as discouraged workers, these people are included in a different jobless rate called U5, which is about one full percentage point higher than the official unemployment rate. Pick a number, any number, just realize that one number is apples, and the other is oranges.

Perhaps more important is if the Federal Reserve realizes that the U-3 rate of 4.8% does not mean we are at full employment. The labor market has changed, and will continue to change. And there is no reason to slow down job growth through monetary policy.

On Wednesday, the Fed kept its benchmark overnight interest rate unchanged in a range of 0.50 percent to 0.75 percent. It said it expected labor market conditions would strengthen “somewhat further”; which is exactly what happened. There’s still a very strong resistance from firms to pay higher wages.

There’s a gradual uptrend, but you’re not seeing rapid wage growth. The weak increase in wages means there is no problem with wage-push inflationary pressures. So, it doesn’t appear that anything in today’s Jobs Report will change the Fed’s gradualist policy path for rate hikes.

A little bit more news to cover today. President Trump signed executive orders to review the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reforms and halt a Labor Department rule designed to curb potential conflicts among brokers who give retirement advice. The Dodd-Frank executive order will ask the Treasury secretary to work with other regulators to determine what the administration can do to fix issues with measures issued under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law.

The Labor Department’s retirement advice rule requires brokers to act as “fiduciaries,” or in their clients’ best interests, when they are advising them about their individual retirement accounts and 401K plans. A presidential order imposed a 180-day delay on the implementation of that rule.

The Trump administration also imposed sanctions on 25 individuals and entities, ratcheting up pressure on Iran in what it said were just “initial steps” and said it would no longer turn a “blind eye” to Iran’s hostile actions.

Friday, January 06, 2017

December Jobs Report

Financial Review

December Jobs Report


DOW + 64 = 19,963 (intraday record 19,999.63)
SPX + 7 = 2276
NAS + 33 = 5521 (another record close)
RUT – 4 = 1367
10 Y + .05 = 2.42%
OIL – .11 = 53.66
GOLD – 8.40 = 1172.80

Today is a Jobs Report Friday. The US economy added 156,000 jobs in December; this was below estimates of around 170,000. The unemployment rate edged up to 4.7% from 4.6% as more people entered the labor force in search of work.

Employers hired 19,000 more workers than previously reported in October and November. The U.S. has created more than 2 million jobs in each year since 2011, though hiring has slowed over the last two years. Employment growth in 2016 averaged 180,000 jobs per month, down from an average gain of 229,000 per month in 2015.

The slowdown in job growth is consistent with a labor market that is near full employment. The latest payrolls tally brought the advance for 2016 to 2.16 million, after a gain of about 2.7 million in 2015.

The steady gains in employment have finally started to push worker pay higher. Average hourly wages jumped 0.4% to $26 in December. Hourly pay increased 2.9% from December 2015 to December 2016, marking the fastest 12-month increase since a recovery that began in mid-2009.

Hours worked were unchanged at 34.3 last month. December’s job gains were broad, education and health services employment rose 70,000, the biggest increase since February. Leisure and hospitality added 24,000. Manufacturing payrolls gained 17,000 after declining for four straight months.

Transportation added 14,700 jobs. Financial activities gained 13,000 jobs. Retail sector employment rose 6,300 after increasing 19,500 in November, although holiday hires were down significantly from 2015 as many retail outlets turned cautious. Government employment increased 12,000 in December. Construction payrolls fell 3,000 in December after three consecutive months of increases.

Among the details of the December report, the participation rate, which shows the share of working-age people in the labor force, increased to 62.7 percent, from 62.6 percent. The participation rate has fallen significantly since its high around the year 2000. The root cause of declining participation remains disputed, with demographics and discouraged workers cited as some of the possible explanations.

In 2017, the labor-force participation number will likely remain a major focus. About half of the decline reflects Baby Boomers moving into retirement; the other half reflects prime-age workers, many of whom have just abandoned their hopes for a job.

The U-6 unemployment rate dropped one-tenth of a point to 9.2%; U-6 is a broader measure that includes unemployed, under-employed or people working part-time who would like to be full-time, and discouraged workers who have stopped looking for jobs. The U-3 rate has in the past few months returned to the pre-recession levels that economists consider full employment.

The U-6 has seen significant gains in recent months, but remains higher than before the recession. When we hear talk about the economy being near full employment, consider the U-6 rate and realize there is still plenty of slack. The BLS reports 1.7 million people are marginally attached – looking for work; 5.6 million are employed part-time for economic reasons.

Janet Yellen has said the economy only needs to add about 100,000 new jobs per month to maintain current levels of employment and absorb new workers into the labor force. Trump promised to create 25 million new jobs under his administration. The math doesn’t work. To add 25 million jobs, would mean dragging people out of retirement and putting school kids to work, and the unemployment rate would be a negative number. It won’t happen. But there is room for continued job growth in 2017.

This is the last full jobs report of the Obama administration. Since January 2009, the economy has added 11.3 million jobs. This includes a decrease of 354,000 government workers, so private payroll growth has been slightly higher.

The Obama administration loves to tout that the economy has added jobs every month for the past 75 months, the longest streak on record and much higher than the previous record of 48 between 1986 and 1990. By comparison, the Clinton administration added 22.9 million total jobs; Reagan added 15.9 million; Johnson added 12 million nonfarm payrolls.

So, on jobs, Obama tops Carter, Nixon, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Bush I and Bush II, and Ford – in that order. Considering that the US lost more than 700,000 jobs in each of the first three months of Obama’s presidency — including 791,000 jobs lost in January 2009 — the comeback for the US labor market has been impressive by most counts. As of December 2016, total non-farm employment exceeded its pre-recession peak by 6.9 million jobs.

As more Americans find work and the labor market tightens, you can expect wages to rise because of the competition among employers to attract the remaining qualified job candidates. In recent months, wages have again gained ground, up 2.9% in the past 12 months, compared to inflation running around 1.5% – so we have real gains.

Before the crash, the U.S. was cruising along with annual wages rising at rates between 3 and 4 percent and those rates are characteristic of other economic boom times over the past 30 or so years. So things are still not quite as good as they were—and a lot of the wage growth that did happen in the first several years of the recovery was in fact eaten up by inflation.

So, if there is slack in the labor force, why are we seeing wages start to pick up?

Part of the answer is basic supply and demand. Part of the answer is demographics and skill sets; many younger workers stayed in school during the downturn and now they are entering the workforce well-trained and demanding decent wages. Part of the answer might be recent legal changes affecting wages.

A few weeks ago, over four million Americans were poised to benefit from new overtime regulations at the start of the new year. The new rule – which would require time-and-a-half pay for those working more than 40 hours a week – was part of an executive order signed by President Obama in 2016. The order would have effectively doubled the salary threshold for mandatory overtime pay from $23,660 to $47,476 – forcing employers to either pay many more workers overtime, or bump their salaries beyond the reach of the threshold.

That executive order was overturned in November by a federal judge in Texas, but it is possible that some workers got a raise before that ruling. Those raises might not last; there are already reports that some employers are clawing back those raises. And there is a strong probability the executive order will be rescinded under President-elect Trump.

Some employers will choose to follow-through with existing salary hikes: Walmart says it plans to keep the pay raises it instituted for entry-level manager salaries. In September, the retailer bumped pay for the position to $48,500 up from $45,000 to avoid the federal-overtime threshold.

Also, many minimum wage workers are seeing an increase in their paychecks. According to data collected by the National Employment Law Project, a workers-rights advocacy group, 19 states and 21 local jurisdictions raised their minimum wages at the start of 2017. Many of those increases were small cost-of-living adjustments, but some of them were dramatic.

Arizona, where voters approved a wage hike on Election Day, raised its minimum wage by nearly $2 an hour, to $10 from $8.05. Maine’s minimum wage jumped to $9 an hour from $7.50. Washington state and Massachusetts both raised their minimums to $11 an hour. In total, six states plus the District of Columbia now have minimum wages of at least $10 an hour. (Oregon will join the club later this year.)

Most of those increases in minimum wage did not show up in the December jobs report, but we should see some impact on the January 2017 report in one month. The big question is whether these aggressive increases in minimum wage will be job killers or poverty preventers.

Most studies have found that wage increases have at most a small impact on total employment – that is, there is little evidence for the claim that the minimum wage is a major job-killer. But over the next few months we will see the minimum wage experiment unfold in real-time.

Part of the explanation for rising wages might also be found in the changing landscape of the labor market. According to a paper published last month through the US National Bureau of Economic Research, routine, low-paying, manual labor jobs are disappearing.

Routine occupations employed about 40 per cent of the working-age population in the US in 1979. That figure was stable for about a decade and then declined steadily to reach about 31 per cent in 2014. Many of those routine jobs have been automated or will be. For workers, that means they either accept low paying jobs in other areas, or train for higher-paying jobs, or drop out of the labor market.

This might go a long way to explaining the historically low labor force participation rate, and the stubbornly high U-6 unemployment rate, and the sudden resurgence in wages. The challenge for the future will be solving the mismatch between the types of jobs people used to have and the types of jobs the economy is currently creating.

In the immediate aftermath of the jobs report, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note rose. The dollar halted a two-day slide. Gold stayed lower, while emerging-market equities were little changed. Oil edged above $54 a barrel before sinking lower. The report did little to alter trader expectations on the Federal Reserve’s path for interest-rate increases.

Friday, November 04, 2016

Jobs Report Friday

Financial Review

Jobs Report Friday


DOW – 42 = 17,888
SPX – 3 = 2085
NAS – 12 = 5046
10 Y – .03 = 1.78%
OIL – .53 = 44.13
GOLD + 1.80 = 1305.00

The economy added 161,000 jobs in October; slightly below expectations of 175,000. The unemployment rate dropped to 4.9% from 5%. This was largely attributable to the 195,000 Americans that dropped out of the labor force, which brought the labor force participation rate down to 62.8% from 62.9%.

The government revised the September report to show 191,000 new jobs were created instead of a previously reported 156,000. August’s gain was raised to 176,000 from 167,000.

The 3-month average now stands at 176,000. Job growth has averaged 181,000 per month this year. In October, the year-over-year change was 2.36 million jobs. The U.S. economy has been adding jobs for 73 consecutive months.

Taking into account population growth and an aging work force, economists at the San Francisco Fed estimated the “break-even” point — growth that is sufficient to keep the jobless rate from rising — now ranges from 50,000 to 110,000 jobs a month. Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said the U.S. economy needs to create 100,000 net new jobs monthly to absorb new entrants to the labor market.

The biggest lingering weakness in the employment picture is in the millions of people who have left the labor force entirely — not just in October, but over the last seven years. Only 59.7 percent of American adults were employed in October, down from 62.9 percent at the start of 2008.

A big part of that decline is demographic: baby boomers hitting retirement age. But millions of people dropped out of the labor force entirely during and after the recession and have not returned to the work force.

Meanwhile, the employment-to-population ratio for prime age workers reached 78.2 percent, its highest level since 2008; and that was one of the best numbers in this month’s report; it is up a full percentage point in the past year.

Now, it still indicates that there is some slack in the labor force – this number could climb to over 80%, but still it is solid. Also, the 25 to 54 participation rate increased in October to 81.6%, an indication that the demographics of the workforce is changing, with older workers retiring and younger workers filling available jobs.

And thus, we are starting to see some increase in wages…, finally. Average hourly earnings climbed by 0.4% during the month, which was better than the 0.3% gain expected. This measure of wages is growing at a 2.8% pace year-over-year. The average U.S. employee earned $25.92 an hour in October, up 10-cents.

Non-managers — what the BLS calls “production and non-supervisory employees” — saw their earnings rise a more modest 2.4 percent, but they too are seeing gains that are running well ahead of inflation. With the PCE inflation gauge at 1.7%, most workers are seeing real gains in wages; for most workers, this means money in the bank.

For much of the past seven years of the economic recovery, the focus has been on just adding jobs, now we are starting to see a shift, where the jobs are a slightly better quality. Most of the employment gains in the past year have been in full-time jobs. Employers are starting to realize they need to pay better to attract and retain good workers. As workers earn wages, they will spend more, creating a virtuous cycle through the economy.

Meanwhile, the prospects of job seekers are improving: More than one in four unemployed workers found a job in October. The so-called job-finding rate fell early this year but has since rebounded. ZipRecruiter, which distributes job postings primarily from small and midsize businesses, reported a substantial jump in listings last month.

The October report showed the average workweek was unchanged at 34.4 hours. Typically, the work week goes down when there is a natural weather event such as Hurricane Matthew, although I have not seen anything to show the hurricane adversely affected job growth.

Health care companies, white-collar professional outfits, and financial firms led the way in job creation. The manufacturing sector lost 9,000 jobs last month. The retail sector lost 1,000 jobs last month. Retailers hired seasonal workers in October at a slower pace than the last two years.

Typically, retail companies start hiring for the holiday season in October, and increase hiring in November. This might be an early indicator of the holiday shopping season. Private payrolls increased 142 thousand. Government added 19,000 jobs.

A broader measure of unemployment, known as the U-6, fell to 9.5% from 9.7%, touching the lowest level since May 2008. The so-called U-6 rate includes part-timers who can’t find a good full-time position and discouraged job-seekers who’ve recently given up looking for work. Even as full-time positions have increased, nearly 6 million Americans are working part-time because they can’t find full-time work, a figure that has stalled out over the past year. At the same time, we are seeing a major shift in how people work.

The winners and losers in the economy have traditionally been easy to identify. If you had a full-time job, you won. A full-time job provided the steady income needed to support our traditional version of the American Dream. A full-time job was also the only way to access important employer-provided benefits, such as health insurance and a pension, as well as protections against workplace injuries, discrimination, and harassment. Whereas a part-time job was on the fringes of the labor market.

One of the things workers learned in the downturn was that a full-time job was not a guarantee of job security. This, in turn, led to more workers engaging, whether involuntarily or voluntarily, in the gig economy. And it turns out the gig economy is just fine for many workers.

Workers with specialized skills, deep expertise, or in-demand experience win in the gig economy. They can command attractive compensation, garner challenging and interesting work, and secure the ability to structure their own working lives. On the other end of the spectrum, retail and service workers currently in low-skill, low-wage jobs can also win in the gig economy.

Consider – a driver for Uber is basically a taxi driver; they are contractors with low pay and no benefits, no overtime or minimum wage, and no access to unemployment insurance. But there are many more people willing to be Uber drivers than taxi drivers, in part because they can control when and how much they work.

There will always be bad jobs or low-paying jobs – the gig economy doesn’t change that reality. However, the gig economy gives low-skill workers a way to move from bad jobs to better work. It’s not a sufficient change, but it’s moving in the right direction.

Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart in a speech this morning, called the jobs report a “solid” outcome. The Fed has been signaling for months that it intends to raise interest rates in December. Fed officials believe that the unemployment rate is close to the level where inflation may spike if rates don’t move up. The central bank said earlier this week that it is just waiting for “some” further evidence of a tightening labor market and rising inflation.

In his speech, Lockhart said the central bank was likely to tighten only “very gradually.” Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan said in another speech that the case for a rate hike was strengthening and Fed Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer said the labor market is strong and the central bank could overshoot its goals.

The most recent data on inflation shows “core” PCE, the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, rose 1.7% year-on-year in October. In October, average hourly earnings rose 2.8% over the prior year, the fastest pace since the recession; this means workers are seeing actual improvement in earnings, for the first time in a long time.

This means the Fed is going to be concerned about inflation, and will have a hard time justifying low rates, better suited for an emergency. It doesn’t necessarily mean the Fed should raise rates, but it likely means they will.

The S&P 500 fell nearly 0.2 percent and extended its losing streak to nine sessions, the longest in almost 36 years. During that streak, the index has fallen nearly 3 percent. Although I tend to believe Wall Street was more concerned with the upcoming election than the jobs numbers.

Friday’s jobs report is, of course, the last one before the presidential election on Tuesday. The Trump camp called the October jobs report “disastrous,” adding that the report, “underscores the total failures of the Obama-Clinton economy that delivers only for donors and special interests and robs working families.”

As a Democrat, Clinton benefits from continued positive news out of the US economy given that voters and markets likely see her administration continuing the economic policies of President Obama. And while economic growth as measured by GDP has been middling at about 2%, the labor market has been notably strong during Obama’s time in office.

The October job numbers will have a large effect on the election. Most voters already know what they think about the economy and whom to credit or blame for it.

So, here are some cold, hard numbers, compliments of CalulatedRiskblog: The Obama administration has added 11,243,000 private sector jobs (and is on pace for 11,864,000); the George W. Bush administration posted a net loss of 396,000 private sector jobs; the Clinton administration added 20,966,000; George H.W. Bush administration added 1,510,000; the Reagan administration added 14,717,000; and the Carter administration added 9,041,000 private sector jobs.

The main message from the payroll report: Millions of Americans have gone back to work since the last recession. Now they’re finally getting some decent pay raises.