Morning in Arizona

Morning in Arizona
Rainbows over Canyonlands - Dave Stoker

The Headline Animator

Showing posts with label ABS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ABS. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Incredibly Orwellian Record High

PlayPodcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 13:16 — 6.1MB)
 
DOW + 24 = 17,156
SPX + 2 = 2001
NAS + 9 = 4562
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.60%
OIL – .90 = 93.98
GOLD – 11.70 = 1224.20
SILV – .16 = 18.62

The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at a record high of 17,156.85; the first record high for the Dow since July. The Dow set an all-time intraday high of 17,221.11. It was the sixteenth record close for the blue chip index in 2014. The stock market action today was focused on the Federal Reserve. I suppose we could say the same thing about the past 6 years.

Today, the Federal Reserve wrapped up its FOMC meeting. The FOMC stands for Federal Open Market Committee, which sounds incredibly Orwellian. The meeting was a rousing success; we know this because the media coverage can’t quite figure out whether the Fed will raise interest rates sooner or later, or whether the economy is weaker or stronger.

While the much analyzed phrase “considerable time” remained in the FOMC statement, the newly announced scheme for interest rate normalization shows that higher rates are in the cards. The FOMC also said labor market conditions improved but a significant amount of slack remains.

The Fed said it would end the bond-buying program known as quantitative easing in October. The Fed will purchase $15 billion of mortgage and Treasury bonds in October and then make no purchases in November. The Fed shared some details of its exit strategy, which clearly indicate they are preparing to raise rates at some point in the future, but Yellen stressed in her news conference that the exit plan “is in no way intended to signal a change in the stance of monetary policy.”

The Fed updated their economic growth forecasts, revising lower; they now say they expected the economy to grow between 2% and 2.2% this year, between 2.6% and 3% in 2015, between 2.6% and 2.9% in 2016 and between 2.3% and 2.5% in 2017. Most Fed officials continue to expect the central bank to first increase interest rates at some time next year. In the forecast, 14 of 17 officials said they continue to believe the Fed’s first increase in near zero short-term rates will occur in 2015. One official believes the Fed should boost rates this year, while two think the central bank can hold off until 2016.

Fed officials raised their median estimate for the federal funds rate at the end of 2015 to 1.375 percent, compared with 1.125 percent in June. And that sounds like fairly aggressive tightening, but they say the rate guidance is “highly conditional” and remains linked to conditions in the economy. So, you combine aggressive tightening with downward revisions to GDP for the next couple of years, and where exactly does that leave you?

Treasuries fell and the dollar gained. The dollar has been on a tear lately.

Consumer prices fell in August for the first time in 16 months as gasoline prices fell. The consumer price index dropped 0.2% after rising 0.1% in June. In the past 12 months, prices have risen 1.7%. Excluding volatile food and energy costs, price were unchanged, the first time so-called core prices have not increased since October 2010. Core prices are up 1.7% the past year.

In August, energy costs fell by 2.6% to mark the largest decline in 17 months. Lower gasoline prices led the way. The price at the pump has been retreating since midsummer and might fall further in the months ahead. Natural gas also decreased for the fourth month in a row. Food costs rose 0.2%. Beef prices jumped 4.2% to mark the biggest increase in almost 11 years. Beef prices have been surging because the US cattle herd is at its thinnest level in decades. It could take several years to build back up. The cost of housing rose again while alcoholic beverages and new cars also increased in price. Airline tickets, clothing, household furnishings and used vehicles declined. And medical costs were flat. Real wages are only up 0.4% in the past 12 months, but lower inflation gives households a short-term boost by stretching how far their paychecks will go. Real or inflation-adjusted hourly wages jumped 0.4% last month, the biggest gain since late 2012; but that’s because inflation is low, not because wages are higher.

The NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market index rose to 59 in September from 55 in August; the index measures sentiment of homebuilders. It was the fourth straight monthly gain following a lengthy slump in builder sentiment through most of the first half of the year.

The Commerce Department said the current account gap, which measures the flow of goods, services and investments into and out of the country, fell to $98 billion in the second quarter from a revised $102 billion shortfall in the first quarter. The current account deficit has been gradually shrinking, hitting a 14-year low in the fourth quarter of 2013, helped in part by declining petroleum imports as the nation reduces its dependency on foreign oil.

The International Monetary Fund says the global economy faces a growing risk from big financial market bets that could quickly unravel if investors get spooked by geopolitical tensions or a shift in US interest rate policy. The IMF also warned that financial market indicators suggested investor bets funded with borrowed money looked “excessive”.

I don’t think the IMF is just looking at margin debt for Mom and Pop investors. Sales of subprime mortgage bonds have withered since the financial crisis, but fresh concerns are arising as issuance of some other types of securitizations surge. Sales of bonds backed by loans used to finance car purchases undertaken by the least creditworthy borrowers have reached pre-crisis levels in the US, prompting a Department of Justice investigation. While losses on subprime auto asset-backed securities (ABS) remained low during the crisis, there are concerns that new specialized lending companies are making riskier loans which are then being bundled into the bonds.

Also, according to Dealogic data, US sales of commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, have also staged a recovery with $102 billion worth of the deals sold last year, the highest amount since the $231 billion issued in 2007. At the same time, some market participants have been warning that the quality of the loans that underpin the bonds – typically secured by shopping malls, office buildings and other commercial properties – has been slipping.

And even when the investor bets aren’t funded with “borrowed” money, the bets can look a bit excessive. Bill Gross, the co-founder of Pacific Investment Management Co., sold most of the $48 billion of US Treasuries held by his $221 billion Pimco Total Return Fund in the second quarter, replacing them with about $45 billion of futures. The contracts require small up-front payments, freeing up money for Gross to invest in higher-yielding securities including Brazilian, Spanish and Italian debt. They are taking the cash and buying all these peripheral bonds that have a lot of spread on them relative to Treasuries; this is apparently the new trend that is occurring across the money-management industry.

And the Wall Street debt underwriters are now pitching the idea of the “mega-deal”. With investors clamoring for higher-yielding assets and companies on the biggest acquisition spree since 2007, bankers are talking up the ability of credit markets to fund really, really big acquisitions, even those looking for $100 billion or more of financing. That’s stoking speculation debt investors stand ready to fund potential takeovers such as a purchase by Anheuser-Busch InBev of rival beermaker SABMiller. And this even as investors brace for the 30-year rally in bonds to come to an end. The bankers are flush from $18 trillion in corporate bond sales globally the past six years, and I guess they need to meet their quota this year.

Investors have poured about $49 billion this year into mutual funds that buy taxable bonds after pulling $20 billion in 2013. The added cash has helped shrink the extra yield that investment-grade debt worldwide pays above government securities by 15 basis putting the spread near a seven-year low. Hmmm, what happened 7 years ago?

Meanwhile, the IMF is concerned the whole thing could unravel because of geopolitical tensions. Today, Congress gave Obama the go-ahead to arm and train Syrian rebels. The US House approved the president’s plan to send military trainers and arms to Saudi Arabia to help Syrian rebels fight the Islamic State. Republican Congressional leaders backed the legislation, despite their concerns that the administration’s response to ISIS is inadequate.

The biggest trick might be finding the right rebels to arm and train. Apparently we’re looking for moderates, in a land not known for moderation. I’m not sure having the Saudis serve as the HR department will work. In more unrelated news, the Saudis are cutting production to sustain prices above $100 a barrel; after all, the Saudis can’t be expected to do all this without compensation. In addition to the higher prices on a barrel of oil, the administration wants to put some 5,000 of these moderate, non-jihadist Free Syrian Army personnel through a training program in Saudi Arabia at a cost of about $500 million. My back of envelope calculation puts that training at about $100,000 for each moderate rebel, which brings a new Orwellian understanding of the Free Syrian Army. I just wonder if this is the best and highest use we could find for $500 million.

Meanwhile, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, US Army general Martin Dempsey, told a Senate committee that if this approach doesn’t do the trick, he may recommend that the US send ground forces. A White House spokesman threw water on the idea, saying the US “will not deploy ground troops in a combat role into Iraq or Syria.” (Nobody had the heart to tell him about the 1600 troops already deployed to Iraq.)

Thursday, September 04, 2014

A Messy Business

Financial Review with Sinclair Noe 09-04-2014
Play
DOW – 8 = 17,069
SPX – 3 = 1997
NAS – 10 = 4562
10 YR YLD + .02 = 2.45%
OIL – .98 = 94.56
GOLD – 8.40 = 1261.90
SILV – .11 = 19.16

Wall Street tried to rally but fizzled instead. The Dow and the S&P 500 hit new intraday records, only to close down on the day. The S&P energy index ended down 1.3% as the day’s worst performing sector in the S&P. Crude oil futures lost 1.1% to $94.56 as the dollar strengthened and weighed on commodities. Tomorrow brings the monthly jobs report.

Payrolls processing firm ADP said private-sector payrolls increased by 204,000 last month after rising by 212,000 in July, with gains spread across a range of industries. While the report was a bit softer than expected, it marked the fifth straight month of gains above 200,000. The ADP report does not always predict the government jobs report but it is a general indicator of the report.

The Institute for Supply Management said its services index rose from 58.7 in July to 59.6 last month, the highest reading since its inception in January 2008.

The Commerce Department said the US trade deficit fell 0.6% to $40.5 billion in July, its smallest size since January. When adjusted for inflation, it reached its narrowest point since December 2013.

A new survey from the Federal Reserve shows the gap between rich and poor Americans continues to widen. From 2010 to 2013, average income for US families rose about 4% after accounting for inflation. All of the income growth was concentrated among the top earners, with the top 3% accounting for 30.5% of all income. The disparity was even greater by wealth, with the top 3-percent holding 54.4% of all net worth in 2013, up from 51.8% in 2007 and 44.8% in 1989. Though incomes of the highest-earners rose, none of the groups analyzed by the Fed had regained their 2007 income levels by 2013. Although wealth did not change much overall, many measures of debt decreased, driven largely by declines in home ownership. On average, debt fell 13%.

The European Central Bank finished its policy making meeting today and announced both an interest rate cut and an asset purchase plan. The ECB governing council lowered the bank’s main lending rate from 0.15% to a new low of 0.05%; they also cut the deposit rate from minus 0.1% to minus 0.2%. The deposit rate is normally a positive number and it is the rate the central bank pays banks for parking excess reserves short-term; that idea is flipped on its head with negative rates; now the ECB charges the banks for placing spare funds with the central bank. Also, the ECB announced that in October it would start to purchase asset-based securities (ABS), whose underlying claims are in the private non-financial sector; and they will re-start a program to buy covered bonds, which are bonds issued by banks that are backed by mortgages or public loans.

The decision to cut interest rates was a bit of a surprise because rates were already incredibly low. Back in June, the ECB cut rates and sent the deposit rate into negative territory; and back then, ECB President Mario Draghi said: “for all practical purposes, we have reached the lower bound.” Apparently, today’s rate cuts were not for practical purposes. By the way, the lower bound refers to the fact that there is a limit in imposing negative interest rates since depositors can switch to cash instead. And that is the point, to get money out of the banks, and into cash, and moving through the economy – which hasn’t happened yet.

The ECB had already greased the skids for the purchase of ABS, but now it has set a firm date. The securities will include mortgages as well as commercial loans among the underlying assets. If that sounds a lot like the Federal Reserve’s Quantitative Easing, well, it is – but it is much smaller than QE. The Fed bought more than $1 trillion in ABS under QE; the ABS market in the euro zone is worth maybe €1 trillion, and the ECB won’t be buying everything. The likely size of possible purchases would be €100 billion to €150 billion, which is not enough to make a big difference. The ECB says it will only buy “high quality assets”, but if they’re just going to skim cream off the top, that’s not likely to free up much capital.

The euro hit fresh 14-month lows against the dollar, dropping under $1.30. And this devaluation may be the major benefit of the ECB’s moves. The euro is now becoming a cheap funding currency for the global carry trade, and this may be the best chance to counter deflation. The bigger problem is that central banks haven’t figured out how to boost demand in the real economy.

The Eurozone economy flat-lined in the second quarter and the Ukraine crisis threatens any recovery. Today, NATO met in Wales and demanded that Russia withdraw troops from Ukraine, and vowed to support Kiev, just not with military force because Ukraine is not part of the military alliance; but they are planning tougher economic sanctions against Russia, if needed.

A NATO military officer said Moscow had “several thousand” combat troops and hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles operating in Ukraine. The Kremlin denies it has any forces fighting alongside the rebels. Russia denies it has troops fighting inside Ukraine but has offered a ceasefire. There is cautious optimism about the peace initiative mixed with a healthy dose of skepticism that the move is nothing more than a smokescreen for further Russian intervention.

Yesterday, I implied that the war in Ukraine was all about oil; there is more to it than that of course, but oil is a major motivation, and it isn’t just that Ukraine serves as a pipeline from Russia to Europe and points beyond. Ukraine sits on its own reserves. According to the US Energy Information Administration, Ukraine has Europe’s third-largest shale gas reserves at 42 trillion cubic feet, an inviting target not just for Russia but also for US oil companies; especially since other European nations, such as Britain, Poland, France and Bulgaria, have resisted fracking technology because of environmental concerns. An economically weakened Ukraine would presumably be less able to say no. The fracking could mean both a financial bonanza to investors and an end to Russia’s dominance of the natural gas supplies feeding central and eastern Europe. So the economic and geopolitical payoff could be substantial.

Oil can be a messy business. Just ask BP. A federal judge in New Orleans has ruled that BP’s “gross negligence” and “willful misconduct” had caused the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 and that the company’s “reckless” behavior made it subject to fines of as much as $4,300 a barrel under the Clean Water Act. The ruling means that the government can impose penalties nearly four times as large as it could if BP were not found guilty of gross negligence. The ruling could open up the company to fines as much as $17 billion. BP has set aside $3.5 billion for potential Clean Water Act fines.

The question of negligence is the first part of a three-part court case about the fines the government can impose on BP. This part assigns blame. The second part will determine the size of the spill; BP’s estimates are sharply lower than the government’s. And the third part will determine the final amount of the Clean Water Act and punitive fines.

BP has spent about $27 billion so far to clean up the oil spill and compensate people and businesses harmed by the spill. The company has taken $43 billion of charges against earnings so far. All three parts of the ongoing court case are separate from BP’s settlement with private plaintiffs claiming economic damages, which BP expects will top $9 billion. And while that sounds like a lot of money, there must be much more waiting to be made. BP has increased its drilling activity in the Gulf of Mexico and continues to bring new wells online. At the end of 2013, the company was operating 10 deepwater rigs in the Gulf.

As you know, Apple has been the meat and potatoes and gravy trade in the markets for quite some time. The high tech Wall Street darling could do no wrong for the past 5 years, as they led the bull market to become the largest capitalized stock in history. They came out with all the cool new stuff, and when there was a lull, they split the stock 7 for 1, mollified activist investor Carl Icahn, and just kept climbing; until yesterday, when the share price dropped 4.2% and fell below $100 a share, on heavy volume. And this, just ahead of the release of the new iPhone. Maybe Apple has lost its cool or maybe it’s overvalued. Or maybe it just fell into Icahn’s bull trap. While a 7 for 1 split might make the share price a bit more affordable for the average investor, it also makes it easier for existing shareholders to slough off a few shares and pocket some profits. The knife cuts both ways.

The hacking of naked celebrity pictures stored on Apple’s iCloud storage system is the worst of a bunch of bad news that has hit the company at once; toss in a prolonged iTunes outage and a new phone from Samsung, and suddenly the new iPhone Release Day didn’t quite look like the religious holiday of the past.