Morning in Arizona

Morning in Arizona
Rainbows over Canyonlands - Dave Stoker

The Headline Animator

Showing posts with label low interest rates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label low interest rates. Show all posts

Thursday, July 07, 2016

Super Low

Financial Review

Super Low


DOW – 22 = 17,895
SPX – 1 = 2097
NAS + 17 = 4876
10 Y + .02 = 1.39%
OIL – 2.23 = 45.20
GOLD – 3.40 = 1360.80

The Fed didn’t raise its benchmark interest rate last month because officials worried about the “surprisingly weak May employment report,” according to the minutes of the June meeting. And that was before the Brexit vote. The minutes offered no guidance on when the Fed might raise interest rates. Of course, the May jobs report showed just 38,000 net new jobs.

Tomorrow morning, we will find out how many jobs the economy added in June; consensus estimates are around 175,000; something close to that number and we can look at May as an aberration. A repeat of May, or worse, and we have serious problems. This morning we got a couple of reports that might offer clues to tomorrow’s report.

ADP reported that 172,000 private-sector jobs were added in June, above economists’ expectations for a gain of 150,000 jobs. According to ADP, small private-sector businesses added 95,000 jobs in June, medium businesses added 52,000 and large businesses added 25,000. All of those gains were in the service sector—208,000 jobs were added there, compared with a loss of 36,000 for goods producers. The manufacturing sector lost 21,000 jobs in June.

Initial claims for unemployment benefits fell by 16,000 last week to a nearly three-month low of 254,000. Layoffs have remained extremely low even though hiring tapered off in the early spring.

Bond yields are really low. Yesterday, the yield on the 10-year note hit 1.37%. Researchers at Global Financial Data checked monthly long term bond yields stretching all the way back to 1786. Based upon 230 years of data, they conclude that interest rates in the US have hit the lowest levels ever. So is this good or bad news? If you have solid credit and a decent job and you’re looking to get a mortgage and buy a house, or refinance a mortgage, this is incredibly good news.

The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage followed Treasury yields, falling seven basis points to 3.41% in this week’s survey. Mortgage rates have now dropped 15 basis points over the past two weeks, leaving them only 10 basis points above the all-time low. As a result, home loan volume is soaring. The Mortgage Bankers Association reports mortgage applications rose 14.2% over the previous week, in a survey ending July 1. Refinance application volume jumped almost 21% last week to its highest level since January 2015.

If you’re a well-run company looking to borrow and expand, again, this historic low interest rate environment is good news. The same goes for governments who want to borrow and invest in costly infrastructure projects that pay dividends over time.

On the other hand, if you are a bank or financial institution that makes your money on the spread between borrowing short term and lending long term, this is making life more difficult. Likewise, if you’re an insurance company trying to buy long-term bonds that pay you enough of a return to match the claims customers will make on you decades in the future, this is a very difficult environment.

Danone, the world’s largest yogurt maker, has agreed to buy U.S. health group WhiteWave Foods in what would be the French company’s largest acquisition in 10 years. The offer equates to $56.25 per share in cash, resulting in an enterprise value of around $12.5 billion, and would double the size of Danone’s U.S. business.

Avast Software has agreed to buy AVG Technologies for $1.3 billion in cash to expand its geographical reach, internet security opportunities and tap into newer areas such as Internet of Things. Avast, which provides free and paid software for personal computers and mobile devices, has more than 230 million users worldwide.

Burger chain Wendy’s says that a malware it had found at some franchisees in June had enabled hackers to access payment card information from the point-of-sales systems. The company said hackers targeted cardholder names, card numbers and the three-digit card verification value number found on the back of cards.

Since the start of 2016, 20 of the world’s bigger banks have lost a quarter of their combined market value, or about $465 billion, according to FactSet data. They have been losing value since the start of the year, and the Brexit vote was just salt on a wound. The biggest market-value losers, in dollar terms, so far this year: Italy’s UniCredit has lost nearly two-thirds of its value; Royal Bank of Scotland has fallen around 56%; and Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank and Barclays have all about halved. UniCredit trades at about 21% of book value. Deutsche Bank trades at about 26%, or where it was during the darkest days of the financial crisis.

That means some of these banks are either a bargain or there are legitimate concerns about their viability. Deutsche Bank, Germany’s largest bank, now has a market value that in dollar terms is less than that of SunTrust Banks, the regional U.S. bank focused on the Southeast. And the market values of UniCredit, Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse combined wouldn’t equal that of Goldman Sachs – itself down about 20% this year.

One of the hardest hit Euro banks is not in the top 20 globally but it is the oldest bank in the world; Banca Monte dei Paschi di Sienna is down 80 percent in the last 12 months. Its shares also trade at under 10 percent of its book value — a measure of its net worth — a sign that investors really think that the bank needs new capital. Also, when bank stocks sink that much, banks find it almost impossible to raise new capital in the markets. The good news is that it is not a megabank, and it is not heavily involved in derivatives trading – it just has a bunch of bad loans. Italy’s banks, including Monte dei Paschi, have about $222 billion of bad loans, and they need about $45 billion in bailouts or bail-ins.

But such a bailout may be illegal under relatively new European rules that aim to protect taxpayers and instead force investors in the banks to provide financial support in times of trouble. Investors lend money to banks by buying their debt securities. Under the anti-bailout rules, those securities would be forcibly turned from debt into new equity, which could absorb any new losses taken on the bad loans. Under such a so-called bail-in, the equity would in theory be worth less than the debt securities, leading to losses for investors who held the debt. The problem with bail-ins is that retail investors take a hit, they stop investing, they stop depositing, they start withdrawing; and before you can blink there is a run on the bank.

The pound sterling, at about $1.2924, has dropped to its lowest level since 1985. If you were ever thinking about a vacation in London, now might be the time. An average round-trip fare from US airports into London was $687.36 by July 3, according to airfare-tracker Hopper. That’s a 14% drop since the Brexit vote, and the lowest fares in 3 years. It might not last. Online searches for flights to the UK are up 60% in the past 2 weeks.

Boeing is stepping up efforts to conserve cash, cut costs in its supply chain and trim inventory of parts in its factories, and relying on suppliers to hold parts instead. Boeing is also telling vendors it will take longer to pay bills; up to 120 days to pay, rather than 30 days in the past.

A House panel will debate legislation today that could block a $17.6 billion sale by Boeing to Iran Air. Three measures will be considered, including one preventing the Treasury from licensing the sale, another stopping transactions tied to aircraft export and a third barring the Ex-Im Bank from providing financing for deals with the Islamic Republic. New laws would affect Airbus as well as other firms, since virtually all modern jets have more than 10% U.S. content and require export licenses.

The U.S. government proposed eight airlines to begin scheduled passenger service to Havana, Cuba. Flights could begin as early as this fall. The airlines winning approval for Havana service were American, Delta, United, Southwest, Spirit, Alaska, Frontier and JetBlue.

If you fly, you know that there is a big problem at almost all airports: the TSA screening process. American Airlines is trying to do something about it. They are teaming up with the Transportation Safety Administration to deploy CT technology for carry-on bags and install automated screening lanes. CT, or computed tomography, is a 3D imaging technology that’s widely deployed in the medical field. Although the technology has been around for more than a decade, only now has the TSA decided to put it into use.

The airline will adopt CT technology in a trial program at security checkpoints located in its Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport hub. Although, CT scanning tech is currently in use for checked baggage, American will be the first US airline to deploy the system for carry-on bags. When applied to the security lane, a CT scanner allows customers to leave their liquids, gels and aerosols, as well as laptops, in their carry-on bags. American Airlines and the TSA expect the Phoenix CT checkpoint scanners to be up and running by the end of the year and could spread to other airports around the country if the trial is successful.

The new security lanes will feature automated conveyor belts to move storage bins between the X-ray machines and the end of the queue. In addition, the bins themselves are 25% larger. There will also be cameras installed to take pictures of the exterior of bags to go along with the X-ray images of its contents. Both parties believe the new lanes, which are expected to come online this fall, will decrease wait times by as much as 30%.

Friday, May 30, 2014

Friday, May 30, 2014 - Record Highs, Bonds, Coal Mines

Financial Review with Sinclair Noe


DOW + 18 = 16,717
SPX + 3 = 1923 (another record)
NAS – 5 = 4242 (not a record)
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.45%
OIL - .71 =  102.87
GOLD – 4.60 = 1252.30
SILV - .23 = 18.91

For the week, the Dow rose 0.7%, the S&P 500 gained 1.2% and the Nasdaq added 1.4%. For the month of May, the Dow gained 0.8%, the S&P 500 rose 2.1% and the Nasdaq climbed 3.1%. Meanwhile, if you are looking for action, the bond market is the place; the yield on the 10 year note has dropped from 2.65% to 2.45% this month.

Nearly everyone is looking for an explanation as to why longer-term interest rates continue to fall in the face of reduced Fed support and what is being hyped as better economic data. This wasn’t supposed to happen. The Federal Reserve has been propping up Treasury bond prices, and suppressing yields, for the past several years by buying large quantities of bonds each month in an effort to increase investment and consumption, and force investors into riskier assets. To some extent, the Fed’s QE purchases have worked; ultra-low interest rates have supported housing price increases and have led to skyrocketing stock prices.  Household net worth has increased by $25 trillion from the financial-crisis lows in the first quarter of 2009.  However, these gains in net worth have overwhelmingly accrued to the well-to-do while low- to moderate-income folks continue to suffer from poor employment opportunities, stagnant incomes, inadequate retirement savings, and rising costs for everything from food and energy to health care and education.  In other words, the economy hasn’t really improved but the Fed may have created financial asset bubbles.

Last December the Fed began winding down its large scale asset purchases by tapering, or incrementally reducing the amount of purchases over a scheduled period of a year or so. Back in December the Fed was buying $85 billion a month in mortgage backed securities and treasuries; they have now cut that to just $45 billion a month, and by the end of the year they anticipate they will end the large scale asset purchases. This means that demand for treasuries and MBS has, or should have dropped significantly. If there is less demand and the supply stays the same, then prices should fall and bond yields should be moving higher. The exact opposite has been happening; long term bond prices have increased and bond yields have been falling; and the timing of this increase in prices and drop in yields coincides with the start of the Fed taper.

Is there something wrong with the supply/demand equation? Is there invisible demand out there? Well, treasuries are considered a safe haven investment, and if we saw volatility in the stock market, we might expect a move to the safe haven of treasuries. Right now the CBOE Volatility Index known as the VIX, is down. As the 10-year yield touches the 2.4% level, its lowest in nearly a year, the VIX is hovering around 11.5, near its lowest levels since before the financial crisis.

The VIX measures volatility in the US market, so maybe we need to broaden out horizons. Europe is experiencing low-flation, and in some Euro countries the low-flation has turned to deflation; as a consequence, the rates in Europe are very low: German 10 year bonds yield 1.36%, France yields 1.75%, Spain 10 year notes yield 2.86%. In a global market there is something wrong with pricing. Why is the US bond yield higher than the French bond yield? That does not compute.

Of course, one explanation is that foreign investors are looking for a place to park money and if you can get a better yield on US treasuries compared to French bonds, it just makes sense that you wouldn’t buy the French bonds; add in the idea that buying US treasuries serves as an effective hedge against home currency depreciation and treasuries should be attracting money that might be held in emerging market economies.

In general, if economic growth is expected to accelerate, interest rates should rise as well.  The reason for this is fairly straightforward.  Increased demand for goods and services should lead to price increases.  Inflation is one component of "nominal" interest rates.  The other component is called the "real" rate of interest, and it is determined by the demand for money.  As economic growth accelerates, the demand for money should increase as people become more confident in making spending and investment decisions.  Therefore, higher inflation expectations and higher demand for money should lead to higher interest rates in a strengthening economy; but they haven't. Perhaps the weak economy of the Eurozone is holding back rates in the US, or maybe the US economy isn’t as strong as we imagine.

Another consideration has us going back to the supply-demand equation; if supply dries up faster than demand dries up, then that would push prices higher. Remember that the federal deficit has been trimmed to the lowest levels in about 13 years and that means the government isn’t issuing as much new debt. And the housing market has slowed and that means there should be less in the way of mortgage backed securities.

That was certainly the case for the first quarter; the US economy shrank. And there are no real signs of inflation in the US, or at least we didn’t see inflation for quite some time. That may be changing; the April CPI and PPI showed a minor pop in prices; the low interest rate environment has boosted financial asset prices, so stocks and housing prices have moved higher; food prices are also higher but they tend to be overlooked as a weather related aberration, although I doubt that is temporary; the labor market is still weak and despite the unemployment rate dropping to 6.3% there is tremendous slack and little participation and there doesn’t seem to be any wage inflation. The Fed might claim the economy is getting stronger and the Fed might not consider deflation to be a problem, but the bond market seems to be saying the recovery is sick. At least for the Main Street economy.

Further proof today showing American shoppers dialed it back in April. Household purchases fell 0.1%, the first decrease in a year, and following a 1% gain in March; that was the bounce back from the pent up demand of the frozen winter. After adjusting the figure to account for inflation, the news was worse; spending dropped by the most since September 2009 as income growth cooled. Incomes advanced just 0.3% in April, and without pay gains, consumers lack confidence. Consumer sentiment dropped from 84.1 in April to 81.9 in May. What we’re seeing is the failure of trickledown. The stock market may be strong, the well-off may be better off, but it doesn’t trickle down. The economy is never going to recovery without broad based demand, and that will only happen when the labor market gets strong, until then, the Fed is pushing on a string with QE and the Zero Interest Rate Policy.

There are many possible reasons behind the move in bonds, but a big part still has to do with the economy, even with all the subplots of the international markets and the inflation-deflation debate, we get back to the idea that the economy is weak, and the recovery is uneven. The first quarter GDP contraction was certainly weather related but that doesn’t mean the economy will bounce like a quarter on a trampoline. Second quarter GDP should be positive but probably not sizzling hot. I don’t buy that story, and apparently the bond market isn’t buying it either.

Next week’s economic calendar includes the ISM surveys of business activity in the manufacturing and services sector. What will be important to the outlook is what the surveys say about employment, export prospects and inventories. On Wednesday the Fed will release its Beige Book of regional economic reports. The next Fed FOMC meeting is June 17-18. Next Friday is the monthly jobs report; the unemployment rate, the headline number is at 6.3%, but that’s based on a participation rate at 62.8%. If the participation rate moves higher, look for the unemployment rate to jump.

Another big event next week, President Obama on Monday will unveil a plan to cut carbon pollution from power plants and promote cap-and-trade, undertaking the most significant action on climate change in American history. The proposed regulations could cut carbon pollution by as much as 25% from about 1,600 power plants in operation today. Power plants are the country's single biggest source of carbon pollution; responsible for up to 40% of the country's emissions.

The rules, which were drafted by the Environmental Protection Agency and are under review by the White House, are expected to put America on course to meet its international climate goal, and put US diplomats in a better position to leverage climate commitments from big polluters such as China and India. The plan is certain to result in political backlash with critics making doomsday claims about the costs of cutting carbon. Coal mining companies, power plant operators and others are already lining up for legal challenges to the executive action, claiming the approach oversteps the EPA’s authority.