Morning in Arizona

Morning in Arizona
Rainbows over Canyonlands - Dave Stoker

The Headline Animator

Showing posts with label Commerzbank. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Commerzbank. Show all posts

Friday, March 13, 2015

Patience For Now

Financial Review

Patience For Now


DOW – 145 = 17,749
SPX – 12 = 2053
NAS –  21 =  4871
10 YR YLD + .01 = 2.11%
OIL – 2.05 = 45.00
GOLD + 6.50 = 1158.40
SILV + .12 = 15.64

At one point today, the Dow was down 250, so it could have been worse. For the week, the Dow was down 0.6% and the S&P 500 fell 0.9%. The Nasdaq was down 1.1% for the week. Today is Friday the 13th. All I can say is pure coincidence. We looked at the market for 148 Friday the 13ths, going back to 1928, there is no particular trend.

 In the last week of January we saw oil prices drop to right around the $45 a barrel level, with intraday lows of $44.37, but the daily closing price hovering just a little above $45. And in February, prices popped up to touch $55.05; prices challenging $55 on 3 days, and could not break out. So, now we are back to challenging support at $45. And waiting to see if the trading range will break down.

The International Energy Agency says oil prices remain fragile due to unrelenting production by US shale-oil producers. There has been an expectation that oil producers would cut back production in response to lower oil prices, but the IEA  report shows oil production in the US has increased by 115,000 barrels, and now we’re running out of places to store the oil. The IEA says it doesn’t see cutbacks in production until the second half of the year; and for now at least, ballooning inventories combined with shrinking oil storage likely will drag prices lower.

Baker Hughes reported today that the oil rig count dropped by 67 last week to 1125, and that has been a trend in the oil patch, but it also means that existing wells continue to produce. At some point, the IEA says those discontinued wells could make a difference in the supply, and when it does it will make for some serious price disruption; but as of now, the cutbacks haven’t kicked in.

Meanwhile, Reuters reports a tentative deal has been reached between the United Steelworkers and oil companies to end the largest US refinery strike in 35 years. The reported deal would last four years and “wage increases would be 2.5% the first year, 3% each in years two and three, and 3.5% in the fourth year.” The strike affected 12 refineries representing a fifth of US refining capacity. The deal still needs approval from the rank and file, but it will likely lead to more refined products making the way to your local gas station, which should open up some of the storage facilities for crude oil.

Next week, European leaders meet to consider whether to prolong economic sanctions on Russia. The thinking is that they will allow most, or all of the sanctions to expire in July, and they will not be looking to add new sanctions.  And while Russia has continued to supply oil to the world markets, an easing of sanctions is likely to result in a fresh wave of Russian oil supply hitting the market; you know, to make up for lost revenue. Also, today Russia’s central bank cut its key interest rate one percent to try to stimulate its economy. That’s the trend these days; cut rates to give a jolt to the economy; it’s also a battle to devalue currencies.

Now, toss in a strong dollar. Over the past 14 sessions, the S&P has had a correlation of -0.96 to the dollar index, meaning that stocks consistently fall on days when the dollar gains. Perfect inverse correlation is -1.0.

Tokyo stocks surged through the 19,000 level today to record their highest close since April 2000. The Nikkei currently leads all major Asian markets with a 10.5% year-to-date gain. The Japanese stock market has been sparked by Bank of Japan stimulus, (known as Abenomics), which has pushed the yen down to the lowest levels against the dollar in 8 years.

And of course, the European Central Bank started its version of QE this week, and they will be buying about $66 billion dollars of bonds per month. In addition, concerns about Greece’s status in the euro bloc have weighed on the common currency. The dollar pushed to a new 12 year high today against the euro.

Also, investors are wagering that recent solid jobs data from February will persuade the Fed to send signals for a coming rate increase, perhaps as early as midyear, at its two-day Federal Open Market Committee meeting next week. The pace of the dollar’s rise against worldwide currencies suggests a number of undesirable outcomes for the US economy. First, there’s the loss in export competitiveness. In fact, the U.S. trade deficit just hit a record high (excluding oil). Secondly, corporations have to endure the disintegration of profits made in foreign currencies. Indeed, forward earnings estimates for the initial two quarters of 2015 have turned negative. But the Fed is looking at something different, and they are likely to hint at raising rates, even as it becomes harder to justify a rate hike. Still, no one wants to be short dollars going into FOMC. The Fed meets Tuesday and Wednesday, and until then we’ll just have to be patient.

One of the side effects of a strong dollar is disinflation, or maybe we could even call it deflation. Producer Prices dropped 0.5% in February. Despite the first rise in gasoline costs since last summer, US producer prices, or prices at the wholesale level, fell in February for the fourth straight month. Wholesale gas prices climbed 1.5% in February, the biggest increase since last June. Yet food prices retreated 1.6% to mark the biggest pullback in almost two years. Trade prices sank a record 1.5%. Excluding the volatile categories of trade, food and energy, core prices were flat on the month. Over the past year overall producer prices have fallen by 0.6%, the first 12-month decline on record.

The University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment index dropped to 91.2 in March from 95.4 in February. That’s the worst reading since November. We get cranky when we have to pay more for gas.

The Feds are looking into hedge fund manager Bill Ackman’s assault on Herbalife. Neither Ackman nor his fund, Pershing Square, has been served a subpoena. But The Wall Street Journal reports: “Prosecutors in the Manhattan US attorney’s office and New York field office of the FBI have conducted interviews and sent document requests in recent months in connection with the investigation, which is looking into whether people, including some hired by Mr. Ackman, made false statements about Herbalife’s business model to regulators and others in order to spur investigations into the company and lower its stock price.”

This week we learned that Wall Street bankers are struggling, and the bonus pool paid to security industry employees in New York City – that’s just in New York City – was $28.5 billion. It works out to an average bonus of $172,860. So somebody at the Institute for Policy Studies pulled out their calculator and figured that if you take 1.03 million full-time workers paid an hourly wage of $7.25 or less, the minimum wage, and multiplied by 50 hours of work per week; the total compensation would be about $15 billion dollars, more or less. A 40 hour work week would put the compensation at about $14 billion. So, the sum of Wall Street bonuses just for New York City is roughly twice the total amount paid to all the full-time workers paid minimum wage in the entire country.

It has been a busy week, which included news that most of the big banks had passed a stress test, and you might think that means the banks haven’t been getting into trouble. Not exactly. It’s time for today’s edition of “Banks Behaving Badly”. We start with Commerzbank, one of Germany’s largest lenders, which agreed to pay nearly $1.5 billion and dismiss some of its employees to resolve an array of charges in the United States. Commerzbank was accused of sending tainted money through the American financial system; siphoning funds to sanctioned Iranian corporations, facilitating accounting fraud at Olympus, the Japanese camera company; charged with Bank Secrecy Act criminal offense and institutional anti-money laundering. Eight regulatory agencies investigated the bank.

Leslie Caldwell, head of the Justice Department’s criminal division, which prosecuted the criminal part of the case said, “Financial institutions must heed this message: Banks that operate in the United States must comply with our laws, and banks that ignore the warnings of those charged with compliance will pay a very steep price.” And of course, we all know that means there were no indictments, just a fine; but in a rare breach of prosecutorial etiquette, the bank was not allowed to deny wrongdoing.

Meanwhile Bloomberg reports the Justice Department is about to get tough on banks that rigged the foreign exchange markets. Prosecutors are reportedly pressing Barclays, Citigroup, JPMorgan and the Royal Bank of Scotland to plead guilty, which would mean a fine, and the starting point for rigging the global currency markets is $1 billion, more or less. In keeping with prosecutorial etiquette, prosecutors are seeking a simultaneous settlement with the banks, which would enable the lenders to avoid being singled out for industrywide conduct.

Two weeks ago the FCC voted to approve rules on net neutrality and today they released the text on the actual rules. A couple of key points, the new rules will ban paid prioritization – so the internet cannot be divide into “haves” and “have nots”, or fast lanes and toll lanes; also the rules would ban blocking, meaning consumers must get what they pay for, unfettered access to any lawful content on the Internet.

The 400 pages of the FCC rule aren’t exactly beach reading, but if you are still trying to understand the importance of the ruling and the need for it, the first two sentences offer a nice summation: “The open Internet drives the American economy and serves, every day, as a critical tool for America’s citizens to conduct commerce, communicate, educate, entertain, and engage in the world around them. The benefits of an open Internet are undisputed.”

Monday, September 29, 2014

Bring Your Umbrellas

FINANCIAL REVIEW

Bring Your Umbrellas

Financial Review
DOW – 41 = 17,071
SPX – 5 = 1977
NAS – 6 = 4505
10 YR YLD – .04 = 2.49%
OIL + .59 = 92.61
GOLD – 4.40 = 1216.00
SILV – .20 = 17.56
Starting with economic data:
Consumer spending accelerated in August. Consumer spending rose 0.5% last month after being unchanged in July. Growth in personal income ticked up 0.3%, in line with forecasts. Some of the strength in spending came from a decrease in the saving rate, which eased back from a 1-1/2-year high in July.
One area where spending dipped – housing. The National Association of Realtors issued its index of pending home sales for August. Pending sales dropped 1% from an 11 month high in July. Signaling that upcoming closings of existing homes are likely to slow down, the index of pending home sales hit a seasonally adjusted 104.7 in August, compared with 105.8 in July.
The Fed’s preferred gauge of inflation was up 1.5% in August from a year earlier, down slightly from the reading in July. Excluding volatile food and energy prices, so-called core prices also advanced 1.5% year over year. Price increases measured by the PCE index slowed to a 1% annual pace late last year before accelerating during the spring and then plateauing this summer. A separate measure also shows inflation is largely in check. The Labor Department’s consumer-price index rose 1.7% in August from a year earlier. That was a marked slowdown from the better-than-2% pace recorded the previous four months.
Weak inflation gives the Fed leeway to maintain its low-interest rate policy without causing the economy to overheat. The Fed aims to set monetary policy so that prices will increase 2% a year. Now, the next logical question might be: why does the Fed target 2% inflation? And the official answer is that the Fed thinks 2% is consistent with its mandate of price stability and maximum employment. Of course, you could make the argument that 4% inflation could be just as stable as 2%, as long as everyone came to expect 4%, and there were no curve balls, we could have price stability at 4% just as easily as 2%. And the notion that the Fed might raise rates if inflation does hit 2%, well that doesn’t seem to be a good idea when it comes to maximum employment; just because inflation hits 2%, that seems a weak reason to tighten credit and slam the brakes on recovery.
So, back to the question: why 2%? Apparently they haven’t figured out a better way to turn the money spigot on and off; perhaps a combination of population growth and productivity growth; expanding the money supply to match the growth of people and things. Instead, they picked a number out of thin air, which is also how they create more money.
Each year Forbes comes out with its list of the 400 wealthiest Americans. It takes just over $1.5 billion to make the list, and it’s just Americans. Bill Gates is the richest American for the 21st year in a row, with a net worth of $81 billion. He’s the world’s second richest person, behind Mexico’s Carlos Slim. The second richest American is Warren Buffet at $67 billion; Larry Ellison is number 3 at $50 billion. All together the 400 wealthiest Americans are worth a staggering $2.29 trillion, up $270 billion from a year ago. That’s about the same as the gross domestic product of Brazil, a country of 200 million people.
Today’s geopolitical hotspot is not in Iraq, or Syria, or Israel, or Ukraine, or even Scotland; it’s Hong Kong. No we did not see this one coming. Tens of thousands of pro-democracy protesters blocked Hong Kong streets today, carrying umbrellas and chanting slogans and singing songs. Riot police had largely withdrawn and there were none of the clashes, tear gas and baton charges that had erupted over the weekend. As tensions eased, some exhausted demonstrators slept on roadsides while others sang songs or chanted slogans. The protesters are demanding full democracy and have called on the city’s leader Leung Chun-ying to step down after Beijing last month announced a plan to limit 2017 elections for Hong Kong’s leader, known as the Chief Executive, to a handful of candidates loyal to Beijing.
China rules Hong Kong under a “one country, two systems” formula that accords the former British colony a degree of autonomy and freedoms not enjoyed in mainland China, with universal suffrage set as an eventual goal. This protest could go a couple of ways: first, mainland China could send in the tanks, but they seem to be veering away from this idea, and instead, just letting the whole thing stew in its own juice, allow the dysfunction to burgeon until a local backlash is triggered or, failing that, at least stew until the local worthies have had enough and publicly petition Beijing to help them out of the mess. It’s a tightrope act. The problem is that news might get through to the mainland, and they might demand universal suffrage. Even worse, Americans might hear about it and might actually demand the right to vote.
Ohio established its early voting period in 2005, following a 2004 general election in which some voters in urban areas were forced to wait up to 12 hours to cast a ballot. Today, the US Supreme Court ruled against in-person early voting in Ohio. The first week of early voting, which the legislature cut, overlapped with voting registration and allowed residents to register and cast a ballot on the same day. The Supremes think that is a bad idea. If voters do get stuck in long lines again, maybe they can take an umbrella.
In today’s edition of “Banks Behaving Badly”, we start with the case of Commerzbank. In 2012, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York entered into an agreement with Commerzbank that required its New York branch to improve compliance with anti-money laundering laws and regulations. After finding the branch still failed to maintain adequate controls, the Fed issued a cease and desist order last year. Now, the US Attorney for Manhattan is investigating Commerzbank AG for alleged violations of money-laundering laws, potentially throwing a wrench in efforts by Germany’s second-largest bank to settle separate allegations that it violated sanctions by doing business with Iran and Sudan.
Meanwhile, the New York Department of Financial Services directed the bank to take steps to terminate a handful of employees who engaged in misconduct; that, as part of a $650 million settlement over the sanctions related violations. So, you have the US attorney going after Commerzbank; you have the state regulator going after Commerzbank, and all this after the NY Federal Reserve Bank of New York signed an agreement with Commerzbank that they must clean up their act, and when they didn’t they issued a cease and desist. I guess they just can’t help it.
Next on the docket is a familiar visitor, Bank of America. The SEC said Bank of America overstated its regulatory capital by greater and greater amounts in its regulatory filings, eventually reaching billions of dollars. The bank reported the overstatement in April and has been working with regulators to resolve the matter. The SEC has fined BofA $7.6 million. I’m sure that will be a huge deterrent.
Back in July, Lloyd’s Banking Group agreed to pay more than $380 million to British and United States authorities to resolve investigations into the manipulation of rates, including one used to determine fees paid by Lloyds related the bailout Lloyd’s received during the financial crisis. Lloyd’s admitted to criminal wrongdoing by some of its employees who manipulated the Libor, or London interbank offered rate, which is the global benchmark for interest rates on pretty much everything from mortgages to derivatives to the rate on a taxpayer bailout of a bank, apparently. Now, Lloyd’s says it has fired 8 employees and clawed back about $4.9 million in bonuses.
This is wrong on so many levels: first, the employees have continued to work for the bank; next, none of them are going to jail for admitted criminal wrongdoing; and third, the claw back comes from bonuses, which means that someone in the bank, who determines bonuses, thought that these rate rigging employees were doing such a fine job, that they deserved six figure bonuses.
Two former Wells Fargo employees have been charged by the SEC with insider trading. An analyst at the bank would tip off a trader in advance about market moving upgrades or downgrades. Nice.
Back in 2006, Congress approved the Military Lending Act on concerns that payday lenders, which offer double-digit interest loans tied to a borrower’s next paycheck, were preying on soldiers and their families, by hitting them with triple digit interest rates on short-term loans and subprime double digit rates on mortgages. It just didn’t seem right that people who were putting their life on the line for their country, should have to pay a pound of flesh to the shylocks of the world. The law set a 36% interest rate cap on a range of high-cost loan products; which still works out to about a half pound of flesh. And then, to really show how much Congress supports our troops, they left a whole bunch of loopholes in the Military Lending Act, because many payday lenders are also big campaign contributors. And so payday lenders just made minor changes to their payday loans, and kept charging rates that would make Tony Soprano blush.
The ultimate price of those loans for military members turned out to be particularly steep, costing them their homes, their cars, and, in some cases, their jobs. The military considers personal indebtedness to be a threat to national security, so high levels of debt can imperil service members’ security clearances.
Now Congress could have made some different choices; they could have decided to pay our troops a living wage; they could have set up a Military Bank to offer soldiers the same low rates they offer the bankers – essentially zero percent interest; and they could have closed the loopholes for the payday lenders. And now 7 years after the fact, that’s what they are debating – closing the loopholes. Last year, the Senate Commerce Committee convened a hearing on abusive practices aimed at military members. And the Defense Department started to solicit input about whether the protections, as they currently stood, needed to be updated. And maybe, when Congress gets back from their 2 month vacation, they will actually consider maybe doing something.